Bot 007

Bot 007 — CS2 Stats

DK76561198292990755[U:1:332725027]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,013Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,627 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 -2,504 23 Apr – 25 Oct · 17 days played
13,99218,892peak 18,89223 Apr25 Oct
18,911Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,627Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-04-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,627
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,893 below peak (18,892)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBot 007FACEITLevel 9 · 1,627 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,627csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning71
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateWLWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility7.7
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.3
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 50% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning7.1
Utility7.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time555ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 24 Apr →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · nuke, 3 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 26 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2315–865%0.02
infernoC208–1240%0.01
anubisD175–1229%0.02
ancientC177–1041%0.03
cacheS96–367%0.02
dust2C83–538%-0.01
mirage—31–233%0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

407Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
95.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7749%1.3018.3
Nuke7464%1.4520.1
Ancient6757%1.4120.4
Overpass2339%1.1218.3
Anubis2050%1.2518.6
Dust21631%1.0715.8
Train1250%1.2917.7
Cache944%1.2817.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
549msReaction time
49.8%T opening success
66.7%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
10.12HE damage / grenade
11.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0120%25 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0320%25 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0825%25 Oct →
mirage13–50.0217%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.0011%25 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0410%25 Oct →
cache13–20.0116%25 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0016%23 Oct →
dust214–160.0425%23 Oct →
dust28–130.0221%23 Oct →
cache9–130.0616%22 Oct →
inferno13–80.0613%22 Oct →
cache13–40.0611%22 Oct →
dust213–00.1124%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.0516%15 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0510%15 Oct →
anubis13–10.0024%15 Oct →
ancient13–70.0415%13 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0110%13 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0211%13 Oct →
inferno13–40.0933%13 Oct →
mirage8–130.0511%4 Oct →
nuke10–130.0213%3 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.028%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0320%3 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0217%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0317%3 Oct →
nuke13–60.039%3 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0515%17 Sept →
nuke13–10.1741%17 Sept →
nuke9–130.0221%10 Sept →
cache13–100.0330%3 Sept →
nuke13–20.0547%3 Sept →
nuke13–90.0520%3 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0423%3 Sept →
anubis4–130.0420%3 Sept →
nuke13–40.0213%3 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0315%27 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0613%27 Aug →
nuke6–130.0226%27 Aug →
ancient6–130.0421%27 Aug →
ancient13–160.0317%26 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0514%26 Aug →
inferno13–50.0518%26 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0124%26 Aug →
ancient13–100.1320%26 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0337%24 Aug →
inferno7–130.0222%24 Aug →
anubis13–90.0525%24 Aug →
ancient11–130.0322%24 Aug →
nuke13–80.0428%9 Jun →
nuke13–50.029%9 Jun →
anubis11–130.0811%9 Jun →
nuke13–90.0327%9 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0125%8 Jun →
anubis5–130.0525%8 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0219%8 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0118%8 Jun →
cache13–100.0638%8 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0128%8 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0017%8 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0117%1 Jun →
ancient9–130.0019%1 Jun →
anubis15–15-0.0019%28 May →
ancient13–7-0.0121%28 May →
inferno11–13-0.0330%28 May →
ancient8–13-0.0117%27 May →
anubis3–13-0.0217%27 May →
ancient13–90.0522%26 May →
nuke11–13-0.096%26 May →
anubis9–130.0118%25 May →
anubis13–30.0723%25 May →
ancient3–130.0220%25 May →
overpass13–3-0.0415%23 May →
ancient10–130.0318%23 May →
anubis10–13-0.0424%23 May →
inferno8–130.0323%23 May →
nuke13–100.0127%23 May →
ancient5–130.036%1 May →
inferno6–130.0126%1 May →
overpass13–40.1326%28 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0712%28 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0311%27 Apr →
ancient16–130.0318%27 Apr →
nuke13–80.0719%27 Apr →
inferno13–50.0819%27 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.0415%27 Apr →
nuke13–20.1621%27 Apr →
cache13–8-0.0021%26 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0018%26 Apr →
anubis10–130.0819%26 Apr →
inferno13–110.0623%25 Apr →
nuke13–100.0027%25 Apr →
anubis8–130.0318%25 Apr →
anubis13–40.0220%24 Apr →
overpass13–80.0221%24 Apr →
inferno13–50.0240%24 Apr →
ancient13–30.1713%24 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0520%24 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0214%23 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.