Lebron James — CS2 Stats
76561198277366699[U:1:317100971]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 4 median | Level 5 median | vs Level 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.6% | 42.7% | 44.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 16.3% | 10.8% | 11.6% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.87 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.16 short |
| Match win rate | 40.3% | 44.1% | 45.1% | 4.8% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Limited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 67% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 62 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | D | 14 | 4–10 | 29% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | -0.04 |
 cache | B | 10 | 5–5 | 50% | -0.05 |
 inferno | C | 8 | 3–5 | 38% | -0.05 |
 nuke | D | 6 | 1–5 | 17% | -0.04 |
 anubis | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | -0.04 |
 ancient | — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.01 |
 vertigo | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.01 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.03 |
| office | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.05 |
Across the last 62 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 12 | 50% | 0.77 | 12.3 |
| Ancient | 8 | 62% | 0.85 | 13.1 |
| Anubis | 5 | 40% | 0.76 | 11.4 |
| Inferno | 4 | 50% | 0.66 | 6.3 |
| Nuke | 3 | 100% | 1.22 | 14.7 |
| Vertigo | 3 | 67% | 1.16 | 17.0 |
| Overpass | 2 | 0% | 0.50 | 8.5 |
| Dust2 | 1 | 0% | 0.94 | 17.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3995 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.3331% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| inferno | 11–13 | -0.08 | 11% | 26 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.03 | 18% | 26 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 16–13 | -0.04 | 18% | 23 Aug → | |
| inferno | 2–13 | -0.07 | 15% | 23 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.05 | 14% | 23 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 11–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 22 Aug → | |
| cache | 2–13 | -0.13 | 6% | 21 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 15–15 | -0.04 | 23% | 21 Aug → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.08 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| mirage | 0–12 | -0.02 | 29% | 20 Aug → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| inferno | 3–13 | -0.05 | 35% | 20 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.00 | 15% | 19 Aug → | |
| inferno | 3–13 | -0.08 | 13% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.06 | 16% | 19 Aug → | |
| cache | 11–13 | -0.01 | 9% | 30 Jul → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.02 | 10% | 29 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–11 | -0.02 | 19% | 27 Jul → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | 0.00 | 24% | 27 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.03 | 28% | 25 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–2 | -0.05 | 15% | 25 Jul → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.06 | 14% | 25 Jul → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.04 | 27% | 25 Jul → | |
| ancient | 15–15 | -0.01 | 22% | 24 Jul → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | -0.05 | 16% | 24 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.01 | 21% | 23 Jul → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 23 Jul → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.04 | 32% | 12 Jun → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 10 Jun → | |
| vertigo | 8–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 7 Jun → | |
| vertigo | 13–9 | 0.01 | 12% | 7 Jun → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | -0.02 | 12% | 1 Jun → | |
| mirage | 4–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 1 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–6 | 0.02 | 23% | 9 Jul → | |
| anubis | 13–11 | -0.02 | 18% | 27 Apr → | |
| overpass | 13–4 | -0.08 | 14% | 23 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 9–7 | -0.04 | 11% | 27 Apr → | |
| mirage | 2–9 | 0.00 | 10% | 24 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 5–9 | -0.07 | 14% | 21 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 5–9 | -0.16 | 7% | 16 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 9–6 | 0.03 | 11% | 16 Apr → | |
| mirage | 4–9 | 0.01 | 12% | 13 Apr → | |
| overpass | 9–7 | 0.02 | 20% | 11 Apr → | |
| nuke | 4–9 | -0.04 | 16% | 11 Apr → | |
| mirage | 1–9 | -0.04 | 19% | 9 Apr → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | -0.04 | 11% | 8 Apr → | |
| inferno | 9–4 | -0.03 | 22% | 7 Apr → | |
| office | 8–8 | -0.08 | 4% | 7 Apr → | |
| cache | 9–7 | -0.06 | 13% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 9–1 | 0.06 | 9% | 4 Apr → | |
| cache | 4–9 | -0.08 | 10% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 7–9 | -0.09 | 10% | 3 Apr → | |
| mirage | 9–7 | -0.04 | 32% | 3 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 16–5 | 0.05 | 19% | 31 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 8–8 | -0.08 | 10% | 27 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 9–7 | -0.04 | 25% | 27 Mar → | |
| nuke | 12–16 | -0.10 | 14% | 26 Mar → | |
| mirage | 7–16 | -0.01 | 13% | 24 Mar → | |
| mirage | 5–9 | -0.04 | 13% | 24 Mar → | |
| office | 8–8 | -0.03 | 8% | 27 Feb → | |
| mirage | 11–3 | -0.01 | 30% | 5 Sept → |
Match data via Leetify.