fellnase

fellnase — CS2 Stats

76561198274238236[U:1:313972508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,348Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,422 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,348 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,476 +274 21 Mar – 6 Apr · 3 days played
26,64927,476peak 27,47621 Mar6 Apr
27,476Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,422Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-03-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,422
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfellnaseFACEITLevel 10 · 2,422 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,422csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning58
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +8.2pp headshot accuracy · +105ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 43%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility3.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time583ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy27.0%+6.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–5 · overpass, 21 Mar →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 16 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 18 May →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 17 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
15–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 20anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C229–1341%-0.00
mirageS2015–575%-0.00
cacheC167–944%-0.01
ancientB137–654%0.03
overpassS107–370%0.04
anubisD91–811%-0.00
infernoS64–267%0.03
nuke—21–150%-0.00
boulder—11–0100%0.06
office—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

631Matches
57%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
85.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8662%1.1317.1
Ancient6455%1.1716.9
Dust25353%1.2016.4
Anubis4058%1.1516.4
Inferno3450%1.2117.9
Overpass2065%1.3414.9
Nuke1560%1.1016.2
Train450%1.8114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
548msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.85HE damage / grenade
3.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.444 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7313% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
boulder13–110.0628%17 Jul →
dust28–130.0226%16 Jul →
ancient0–13-0.02100%16 Jul →
mirage13–80.0621%16 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0140%16 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0324%14 Jul →
anubis3–130.0824%14 Jul →
ancient5–130.0121%13 Jul →
mirage13–70.0021%13 Jul →
cache0–13-0.0033%13 Jul →
ancient13–90.0438%10 Jul →
dust213–00.0616%17 Jun →
ancient13–110.0326%17 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0117%23 May →
cache13–70.0324%23 May →
ancient12–120.0121%18 May →
dust24–13-0.0348%18 May →
anubis4–13-0.0130%18 May →
overpass8–130.0321%11 May →
cache6–13-0.0817%11 May →
cache9–13-0.0224%11 May →
ancient13–50.0825%11 May →
dust211–13-0.0315%10 May →
overpass7–13-0.0211%10 May →
mirage13–10-0.0224%10 May →
ancient13–30.1234%6 May →
dust24–13-0.0037%6 May →
cache13–2-0.0033%6 May →
mirage13–70.0219%4 May →
cache7–130.0315%4 May →
cache13–2-0.0021%3 May →
mirage13–2-0.047%3 May →
dust213–80.0829%3 May →
cache8–13-0.0523%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0625%1 May →
cache6–130.0140%1 May →
cache7–13-0.0316%30 Apr →
cache13–100.0427%29 Apr →
cache13–10-0.0215%29 Apr →
cache4–13-0.0429%29 Apr →
nuke13–110.0316%23 Apr →
overpass4–00.0360%23 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0215%23 Apr →
ancient10–130.0028%22 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0126%22 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0028%22 Apr →
cache13–11-0.0311%22 Apr →
inferno13–80.0519%22 Apr →
overpass13–70.0718%22 Apr →
ancient10–130.0526%21 Apr →
mirage13–100.0224%21 Apr →
ancient12–16-0.0610%12 Apr →
mirage16–14-0.0116%12 Apr →
overpass13–6-0.0330%10 Apr →
dust25–13-0.007%10 Apr →
mirage13–100.0117%6 Apr →
ancient13–80.0722%6 Apr →
mirage12–12-0.0133%5 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0132%5 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0522%5 Apr →
mirage13–110.0328%4 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0622%4 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0015%4 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0321%4 Apr →
inferno13–100.0126%4 Apr →
dust213–60.0217%4 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0117%4 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0026%3 Apr →
dust220–220.0115%2 Apr →
mirage13–60.0625%2 Apr →
dust24–130.0029%2 Apr →
mirage5–130.0225%2 Apr →
ancient13–100.0420%2 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0514%30 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0615%29 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0411%29 Mar →
dust213–110.0036%29 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0513%29 Mar →
anubis9–130.0218%29 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0019%29 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0316%29 Mar →
mirage11–130.0423%29 Mar →
mirage13–110.0113%27 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0313%27 Mar →
dust213–60.0333%27 Mar →
overpass13–110.0120%26 Mar →
overpass13–10-0.0222%26 Mar →
dust213–80.0119%26 Mar →
office13–40.0618%26 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0117%26 Mar →
dust213–60.0126%25 Mar →
anubis4–13-0.0322%25 Mar →
overpass9–20.078%23 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0322%22 Mar →
mirage19–17-0.0220%22 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0522%21 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.1021%21 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0139%21 Mar →
overpass9–50.3324%21 Mar →
inferno9–50.1216%21 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.