Emilson

Emilson — CS2 Stats

SD76561198255235008[U:1:294969280]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

198Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (36 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 198 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,537 +6,862 11 Aug – 4 Jan · 22 days played
12,99922,302peak 22,30211 Aug4 Jan
Faceit ELO: 1,246 +0 15 Sept – 9 Oct · 3 observations
1,2461,246peak 1,24615 Sept9 Oct
22,302Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,246Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2025-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,246
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmilson30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,246csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning59
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD60–36–4Last 10060%Win rateWLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.6
Utility6.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time623ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 29 Jun →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · mirage, 1 Jan →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · dust2, 12 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 74% over 34nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S3425–974%0.03
mirageB2411–1346%0.02
infernoA169–756%0.05
ancientA127–558%0.01
nukeC73–443%-0.01
overpass—42–250%0.03
cache—11–0100%-0.03
poseidon—11–0100%0.40
vertigo—11–0100%0.30

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

84Matches
61%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
87.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22462%1.5618.9
Inferno1675%1.5118.6
Mirage1464%1.1915.1
Ancient475%1.4821.0
Train20%1.2219.0
Nuke2100%1.8620.5
Overpass10%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
619msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
60.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0981% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0123%13 Sept →
dust212–160.0121%18 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0737%23 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0328%3 Jul →
nuke0–9-0.2220%29 Jun →
poseidon9–20.4014%29 Jun →
inferno6–90.0722%29 Jun →
inferno5–130.1427%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.0821%6 Jun →
overpass5–130.0521%6 Jun →
mirage13–90.0432%4 Apr →
mirage3–60.048%25 Mar →
mirage4–130.0733%19 Mar →
dust213–90.0222%5 Mar →
inferno13–50.0431%6 Feb →
dust213–50.0730%29 Jan →
dust213–30.0719%29 Jan →
ancient7–130.0625%27 Jan →
dust24–13-0.0125%27 Jan →
dust25–13-0.0723%25 Jan →
dust213–20.0728%25 Jan →
nuke15–150.0425%25 Jan →
dust213–90.0826%22 Jan →
mirage8–130.0419%22 Jan →
dust24–130.0328%4 Jan →
mirage10–130.0140%1 Jan →
ancient2–3-0.100%25 Dec →
mirage9–130.0621%4 Dec →
mirage13–40.0924%3 Dec →
dust213–60.1025%3 Dec →
mirage13–40.2322%3 Dec →
nuke13–90.0916%22 Nov →
ancient13–80.058%22 Nov →
nuke13–60.0116%21 Nov →
dust27–130.0120%21 Nov →
inferno13–40.0923%21 Nov →
ancient15–150.0117%19 Nov →
dust216–14-0.0225%14 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.0024%14 Nov →
dust213–100.0215%2 Nov →
dust213–40.0428%2 Nov →
inferno5–90.0112%2 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0336%30 Oct →
ancient13–1-0.0119%30 Oct →
dust213–100.0820%30 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0221%30 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0125%30 Oct →
dust213–90.1324%25 Oct →
vertigo13–40.3037%25 Oct →
dust216–140.0016%23 Oct →
dust213–50.0232%23 Oct →
dust213–80.0333%23 Oct →
mirage13–70.0015%12 Oct →
dust20–4-0.0229%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0123%5 Oct →
ancient13–30.0216%5 Oct →
mirage11–4-0.0427%2 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0536%28 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0518%28 Sept →
inferno13–20.1022%24 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0126%24 Sept →
ancient6–130.0218%10 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0121%10 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1022%8 Sept →
overpass13–10-0.0220%8 Sept →
dust213–80.0528%8 Sept →
ancient13–80.0621%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.039%30 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0434%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.015%27 Aug →
dust216–120.0127%25 Aug →
ancient13–90.0115%25 Aug →
mirage13–50.0633%25 Aug →
dust27–1-0.0240%25 Aug →
dust211–130.0425%25 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0121%25 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0112%25 Aug →
inferno13–100.0724%25 Aug →
dust216–130.0614%25 Aug →
mirage13–00.0633%25 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0223%25 Aug →
dust215–150.0430%24 Aug →
inferno6–130.0019%24 Aug →
inferno13–50.0728%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0321%24 Aug →
inferno13–90.0413%23 Aug →
ancient6–00.0021%23 Aug →
mirage11–130.0820%23 Aug →
dust213–50.0017%21 Aug →
inferno13–90.1226%21 Aug →
overpass13–30.0217%21 Aug →
inferno13–70.0925%19 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0119%19 Aug →
dust213–40.0533%19 Aug →
nuke13–50.0632%19 Aug →
inferno11–130.0418%18 Aug →
nuke11–130.0424%12 Aug →
dust213–110.0526%11 Aug →
dust213–30.1614%11 Aug →
overpass11–130.0720%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.