ImpulsXE

ImpulsXE — CS2 Stats

DE76561198253722019[U:1:293456291]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

2,879Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,153 → 2,153
+2Tracked matches · now 2,879
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 46 days played since 9 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,455 +578 15 Mar24 Jun · 16 days played
24,87726,611peak 26,61115 Mar24 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,153 +0 2 Sept6 Sept · 3 observations
2,1532,153peak 2,1532 Sept6 Sept
26,611Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,153Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-03-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,153
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 347 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGImpulsXEPEAK ELO2,153csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning37
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53416Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning3.7
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time562ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–2 · sanctum, 16 Apr
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · vertigo, 21 May
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · overpass, 2 Apr
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB26131350%-0.01
anubisB147750%-0.00
overpassD1441029%0.01
infernoS119282%0.01
nukeS96367%0.03
mirageD82625%-0.03
cacheA74357%0.03
dust2A53260%0.04
alpine21150%0.02
vertigo220100%0.03
stronghold110100%0.01
sanctum110100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,708Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
74.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient22047%1.0315.1
Inferno17153%1.0914.3
Anubis12059%1.0914.7
Nuke8347%1.0815.1
Mirage5242%1.0013.6
Vertigo5149%1.0815.8
Overpass4547%1.0614.1
Train2959%1.0714.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
568msReaction time
11.7%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
8.10HE damage / grenade
9.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.6716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.0315%11 Sept
nuke13–20.0516%23 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0310%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.1011%14 Aug
nuke5–130.0232%12 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0029%12 Aug
inferno13–20.019%5 Aug
nuke13–70.0621%31 Jul
inferno13–50.0118%31 Jul
anubis2–130.0227%31 Jul
anubis13–70.0935%31 Jul
ancient13–90.0213%18 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0011%17 Jul
ancient10–130.0018%13 Jul
cache13–9-0.0226%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0419%11 Jul
dust213–30.1233%11 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0321%9 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0610%5 Jul
anubis13–20.0732%3 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0016%30 Jun
ancient3–13-0.086%30 Jun
inferno13–40.0118%30 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0226%30 Jun
anubis13–160.0117%24 Jun
dust213–110.0232%24 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0221%24 Jun
inferno13–70.0911%22 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0222%22 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0021%13 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0215%10 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0313%8 Jun
ancient15–150.0215%8 Jun
inferno13–30.0614%7 Jun
ancient7–130.0218%6 Jun
anubis13–110.0225%3 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0144%3 Jun
nuke13–30.0924%31 May
overpass13–50.0628%29 May
alpine8–13-0.0115%27 May
overpass6–13-0.0324%27 May
mirage13–60.0325%27 May
overpass9–130.0118%24 May
anubis8–13-0.1113%24 May
overpass8–13-0.0312%22 May
overpass1–60.1211%22 May
anubis8–13-0.018%22 May
ancient13–70.0528%22 May
cache8–10.1223%22 May
stronghold13–20.0123%21 May
alpine13–70.0519%21 May
vertigo13–9-0.0245%21 May
ancient12–120.0519%17 May
ancient13–100.0120%17 May
dust211–130.0130%13 May
ancient11–13-0.006%13 May
overpass13–80.0317%13 May
overpass9–13-0.0624%12 May
inferno13–90.0412%12 May
ancient7–13-0.0518%10 May
anubis9–130.0217%10 May
dust28–130.0121%10 May
overpass6–13-0.0613%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0312%2 May
ancient13–40.0419%2 May
ancient13–6-0.0321%2 May
cache12–12-0.0213%30 Apr
cache13–60.0415%30 Apr
cache13–80.0211%30 Apr
cache10–130.0520%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0229%30 Apr
overpass13–70.0215%27 Apr
ancient15–150.0012%27 Apr
nuke12–160.0217%27 Apr
mirage8–130.0316%27 Apr
inferno13–40.0221%27 Apr
overpass15–150.0622%27 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0112%20 Apr
overpass13–110.0513%20 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0212%17 Apr
sanctum9–20.1824%16 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0417%14 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0217%11 Apr
mirage3–13-0.089%11 Apr
inferno7–13-0.096%11 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0220%7 Apr
mirage7–13-0.1112%7 Apr
overpass10–13-0.076%2 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0111%2 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0616%2 Apr
dust213–80.0216%2 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0231%2 Apr
nuke13–110.1017%2 Apr
inferno13–110.0115%15 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0622%15 Mar
anubis4–7-0.0128%15 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0517%15 Mar
overpass5–130.0212%9 Mar
vertigo13–110.0730%9 Mar
nuke13–40.0040%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →