Crimson — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198224635508[U:1:264369780]Steam profile ↗

4,949Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since

7,272Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.6 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,875Blue band · top ~29.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5429 of 8158 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55

Positioning48

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLWLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5

Aggression6.2

Utility3.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels2.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5

Positioning4.8

Utility3.1

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time579ms−72ms

first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms

Headshot accuracy18.7%−3.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–5

13–1Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 37% over 30

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	30	11–19	37%	-0.02
cache	B	24	11–13	46%	-0.00
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.00
mirage	S	11	8–3	73%	-0.01
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.04
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

200,558Lifetime kills

0.88K/D

10,574Matches

41.2%Match win rate

39.2%Headshot %

16.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players

19,925MVPs

4,233Hours (in match)

5,341Bombs planted

1,718Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP36,419

AK-4733,471

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,980

AUG11,539

P2000 / USP-S11,490

Glock-1811,118

Five-SeveN8,238

Tec-97,542

MAC-107,140

SG 5536,910

Lifetime map wins

27,430dust2

12,049inferno

10,958nuke

9,101vertigo

1,790train

95cbble

59office

59lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy

27.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.0%Spray accuracy

83.6%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

586msReaction time

29.4%T opening success

52.5%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

2.63HE damage / grenade

3.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.074 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.4031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	-0.01	22%	27 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.05	10%	27 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	27%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	20%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	23%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.06	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.00	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	22%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	18%	16 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	20%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	22%	16 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.05	15%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	25%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.05	22%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	22%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	20%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	10%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	2%	15 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	13%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	23%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	34%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	28%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	20%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.10	13%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.07	15%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	24%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	17%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	23%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.08	17%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	21%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.03	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	0–4	-0.03	33%	10 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.03	18%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	14%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	38%	9 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.01	24%	9 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.02	20%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	33%	8 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	23%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	32%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	7%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	18%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.06	16%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	12%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	17%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.04	18%	26 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	8%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	31%	25 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	28%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	23%	19 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	26%	19 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	26%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	19%	17 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.01	20%	17 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	17%	15 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.10	10%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	28%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	15%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	22%	12 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	25%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	10%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.09	37%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	26%	11 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	6%	11 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	23%	11 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	22%	11 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	13%	11 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.06	20%	10 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	11%	10 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	28%	10 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.06	33%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	10%	10 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.00	31%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	25%	10 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.02	28%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	25%	9 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	15%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	27%	9 Jul →