Trlz-

Trlz- — CS2 Stats

HR76561198221708268[U:1:261442540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,942Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,420Top 5% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2238 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,333 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,420 +3,154 3 Sept – 4 Nov · 21 days played
24,40128,420peak 28,4203 Sept4 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,333 +0 3 Sept – 1 Nov · 6 observations
2,3332,333peak 2,3333 Sept1 Nov
28,524Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,333Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,333
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 167 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,420
  • +3,759 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,580 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrlz-FACEITLevel 10 · 2,333 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,420 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,333csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning64
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–40–1Last 10059%Win rateWLWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 471ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time495ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 512ms → last ⅓ avg 495ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · ancient, 30 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · ancient, 3 Nov →
328msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 15 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 12dust2Weakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3018–1260%0.01
dust2C219–1243%-0.01
nukeS1210–283%0.03
infernoA106–460%0.02
cacheS97–278%0.03
ancientA85–363%0.03
anubisB84–450%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,982Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
78.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage61854%1.1615.8
Dust235353%1.0915.8
Ancient25246%1.0515.4
Nuke18251%1.1716.0
Inferno17649%1.1515.6
Anubis15744%1.0715.0
Cache5751%1.2216.0
Overpass3642%1.1215.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
490msReaction time
57.0%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
12.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–2-0.050%4 Nov →
ancient11–13-0.0133%3 Nov →
mirage16–120.0319%1 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0524%30 Oct →
dust22–13-0.078%30 Oct →
mirage13–70.0119%30 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0618%30 Oct →
ancient13–110.1326%30 Oct →
inferno11–130.0518%30 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0325%30 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0319%29 Oct →
anubis13–50.0315%29 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0212%29 Oct →
dust26–130.0210%29 Oct →
nuke13–20.0624%29 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.057%29 Oct →
dust213–7-0.026%29 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.039%28 Oct →
mirage16–120.0723%28 Oct →
nuke13–10.1218%28 Oct →
ancient13–100.068%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.1113%28 Oct →
nuke13–110.0923%28 Oct →
mirage13–80.0216%27 Oct →
anubis13–110.0424%27 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.067%26 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0625%26 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0112%26 Oct →
nuke13–40.0016%26 Oct →
nuke13–20.0015%25 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0114%25 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0111%25 Oct →
cache13–80.0121%25 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0431%25 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0217%25 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0519%25 Oct →
cache13–80.0918%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0010%25 Oct →
nuke13–90.0917%25 Oct →
dust213–90.0219%25 Oct →
inferno13–10.1133%25 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0532%24 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0212%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0224%23 Oct →
inferno4–130.0419%23 Oct →
cache13–70.0124%22 Oct →
inferno13–90.0419%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0210%19 Oct →
ancient13–80.0911%19 Oct →
dust212–16-0.069%18 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0223%18 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0515%17 Oct →
ancient13–70.0014%17 Oct →
dust211–130.0926%17 Oct →
nuke13–60.0223%17 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0021%17 Oct →
mirage16–120.0212%17 Oct →
inferno10–130.0123%17 Oct →
cache13–90.0922%16 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0610%16 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0212%16 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0312%15 Oct →
mirage13–60.0113%15 Oct →
mirage13–80.0114%15 Oct →
dust216–130.0414%15 Oct →
ancient12–160.039%15 Oct →
mirage13–80.028%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.067%14 Oct →
mirage13–110.0122%14 Oct →
inferno13–50.0923%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0219%14 Oct →
mirage13–90.0610%13 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0416%13 Oct →
mirage11–130.0219%13 Oct →
mirage10–130.019%12 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0220%9 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0026%8 Oct →
mirage10–130.0229%7 Oct →
dust212–120.0628%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0121%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0520%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.048%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0723%2 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0211%2 Oct →
dust29–130.0726%2 Oct →
anubis4–130.0210%30 Sept →
mirage13–90.0311%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0526%28 Sept →
mirage9–30.0526%28 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0215%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0416%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0416%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0325%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0630%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.098%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0313%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.067%23 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0417%23 Sept →
train7–13-0.0319%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0128%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.