ZZZ — CS2 Stats

CF76561198214636735[U:1:254371007]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

978Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,925 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning57

Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64–35–1Last 10064%Win rateWLLWWWLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression9.3

Utility3.0

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.7

Utility3.0

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time532ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy16.6%−1.8%

first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

10Longest win streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 22ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	47	31–16	66%	0.02
inferno	S	22	16–6	73%	0.02
overpass	A	10	6–4	60%	0.02
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
anubis	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.00
cache_b	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

505Matches

52%Win rate

1.31Avg K/D

76.8ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	171	63%	1.47	17.6
Inferno	71	62%	1.38	16.6
Dust2	48	42%	1.12	15.3
Vertigo	44	52%	1.10	16.9
Ancient	40	35%	1.16	15.3
Overpass	28	39%	1.37	18.6
Anubis	14	7%	0.91	13.7
Nuke	10	20%	1.05	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.0%Spray accuracy

69.3%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

533msReaction time

36.8%T opening success

50.3%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

4.3%Flash assists

10.77HE damage / grenade

3.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3792 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.8013% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–3	-0.04	12%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.04	18%	23 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	31%	13 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	6%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	14%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	7%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	26%	9 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.01	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	25%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	4%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	13%	18 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	10%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.03	19%	24 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.04	23%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.08	35%	7 Feb →
overpass	16–14	-0.04	19%	1 Feb →
mirage	13–1	0.07	33%	29 Jan →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	22%	28 Jan →
mirage	13–4	0.04	30%	28 Jan →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	6%	27 Jan →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	4%	27 Jan →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	6 Jan →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	5%	6 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.02	6%	6 Jan →
mirage	11–0	0.12	0%	6 Jan →
mirage	13–16	0.01	19%	5 Jan →
vertigo	5–13	-0.04	12%	5 Jan →
overpass	13–7	0.03	24%	5 Jan →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	16%	4 Jan →
mirage	10–13	0.01	14%	4 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.02	23%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	26%	3 Jan →
mirage	9–13	0.03	32%	3 Jan →
anubis	13–11	0.01	14%	31 Dec →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	21%	31 Dec →
cache_b	13–11	0.01	16%	31 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.11	23%	30 Dec →
vertigo	10–13	0.08	15%	30 Dec →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	32%	30 Dec →
mirage	19–17	0.04	14%	30 Dec →
inferno	13–11	0.06	32%	29 Dec →
vertigo	13–10	-0.02	20%	29 Dec →
mirage	13–1	0.08	23%	29 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.05	29%	29 Dec →
inferno	13–3	0.05	18%	28 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.03	19%	28 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	7%	16 Nov →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	8%	26 Oct →
overpass	12–16	0.00	19%	26 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	19%	25 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.08	22%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.16	37%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.06	24%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.03	22%	17 Oct →
inferno	16–13	0.09	10%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.04	24%	17 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	13%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.05	27%	12 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.08	21%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.02	9%	12 Oct →
overpass	11–13	-0.05	30%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.15	20%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.04	18%	8 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	0%	7 Oct →
mirage	14–16	0.00	18%	6 Oct →
overpass	13–3	0.05	29%	5 Oct →
overpass	13–9	-0.00	15%	5 Oct →
mirage	11–13	0.01	8%	5 Oct →
inferno	11–13	0.02	16%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	12%	3 Oct →
mirage	16–13	0.01	32%	28 Sept →
overpass	13–16	0.06	17%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.05	21%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	11%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.07	15%	26 Sept →
dust2	14–16	0.03	18%	24 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.05	20%	24 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	17%	22 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.03	20%	22 Sept →
mirage	10–13	0.01	14%	21 Sept →
dust2	13–5	0.13	18%	21 Sept →
inferno	11–13	0.12	41%	21 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.05	28%	21 Sept →
overpass	8–13	0.02	18%	21 Sept →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	8%	18 Sept →
ancient	1–13	-0.04	3%	18 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.06	21%	18 Sept →
inferno	7–13	0.01	19%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.01	14%	17 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.00	20%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	19%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.03	10%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.09	35%	14 Sept →