charlie cuck

charlie cuck — CS2 Stats

76561198213878939[U:1:253613211]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

923Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 -3,552 18 May5 Jul · 20 days played
13,59618,552peak 18,55218 May5 Jul
18,898Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-05-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcharlie cuckFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning39
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38566Last 10038%Win rateLLLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.5
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time642ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 24 Jun
46%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · poseidon, 22 May
461msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 30 Jun
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 28 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 23% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2662023%-0.02
cacheC1771041%-0.00
dust2B147750%0.01
poseidonD113827%-0.05
anubisC94544%-0.00
ancientC94544%0.00
overpassA85363%-0.00
mirage41325%-0.03
shelter110100%-0.04
nuke1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
54%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
77.8ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%0.9614.3
Vertigo956%0.9416.1
Anubis757%0.9215.7
Ancient475%1.3415.3
Nuke367%1.0013.7
Overpass1100%0.539.0
Inferno10%1.4021.0
Dust210%0.7414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
636msReaction time
39.2%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.1806% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0514%3 Aug
dust25–130.0121%30 Jul
inferno7–130.0120%27 Jul
dust213–90.0317%27 Jul
dust213–60.0718%27 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0521%27 Jul
inferno2–7-0.1245%23 Jul
anubis7–130.0123%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0316%22 Jul
shelter13–5-0.0427%22 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0716%16 Jul
cache8–30.0022%16 Jul
dust213–90.0116%16 Jul
inferno13–100.0716%16 Jul
cache13–110.0118%16 Jul
cache13–16-0.0225%13 Jul
cache11–130.0017%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.0215%12 Jul
dust213–80.0324%12 Jul
cache12–12-0.0322%5 Jul
cache3–13-0.0517%5 Jul
ancient14–160.0420%5 Jul
overpass16–120.0320%5 Jul
dust213–50.0712%5 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0417%2 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0319%2 Jul
inferno13–100.0316%2 Jul
overpass13–100.0519%30 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0817%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0427%28 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0124%28 Jun
ancient13–20.0524%28 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0318%28 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0521%28 Jun
ancient13–60.0622%28 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0024%28 Jun
anubis13–40.0218%28 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0421%24 Jun
anubis13–30.0924%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0726%24 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2010%24 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0237%19 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0717%19 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0915%19 Jun
ancient10–130.0336%19 Jun
dust214–160.0126%19 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0429%19 Jun
cache12–12-0.0417%19 Jun
mirage11–130.0117%18 Jun
overpass12–160.0219%18 Jun
overpass15–15-0.0220%17 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0017%17 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0713%16 Jun
dust211–130.0419%16 Jun
dust24–13-0.0339%16 Jun
dust213–70.0324%14 Jun
dust25–13-0.0424%14 Jun
ancient9–130.0229%14 Jun
cache9–13-0.0021%14 Jun
poseidon3–9-0.1039%14 Jun
poseidon3–9-0.0332%14 Jun
cache5–13-0.0524%13 Jun
cache13–100.0130%13 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0417%11 Jun
anubis0–13-0.029%8 Jun
inferno10–130.0322%8 Jun
cache13–8-0.0413%7 Jun
cache13–11-0.0121%7 Jun
poseidon3–9-0.1225%7 Jun
poseidon8–8-0.0725%7 Jun
overpass12–120.0124%4 Jun
cache13–50.0833%4 Jun
cache7–130.0325%4 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0125%2 Jun
inferno14–160.0214%2 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0929%1 Jun
inferno9–130.0535%31 May
overpass16–13-0.0124%31 May
cache9–13-0.0130%29 May
cache13–110.0826%28 May
poseidon9–4-0.0621%28 May
anubis16–130.0223%27 May
ancient13–90.0223%27 May
inferno14–160.0426%27 May
inferno8–13-0.0715%26 May
inferno13–16-0.0314%26 May
anubis11–130.0328%26 May
poseidon9–70.0420%22 May
poseidon4–90.0325%22 May
poseidon8–8-0.0529%22 May
poseidon9–40.0311%22 May
poseidon4–9-0.1346%22 May
poseidon4–9-0.0526%22 May
overpass13–10-0.0523%21 May
inferno4–130.0125%21 May
dust24–13-0.0619%21 May
inferno9–13-0.0137%19 May
dust25–13-0.0712%19 May
mirage9–13-0.0411%18 May
inferno8–13-0.0220%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →