mitro — CS2 Stats

76561198212068292[U:1:251802564]✓ No bans

2,527Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,364 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning58

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWLWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression7.4

Utility6.2

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.7

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.8

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time529ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 541ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms

Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 57% over 7anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	51	26–25	51%	0.03
anubis	C	13	5–8	38%	0.02
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
dust2	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
vertigo	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
nuke	—	4	0–4	0%	0.02
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,540Matches

54%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

79.2ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	415	51%	1.12	16.5
Dust2	277	53%	1.10	16.1
Ancient	238	52%	1.09	15.9
Anubis	113	55%	1.14	17.0
Inferno	94	50%	1.03	15.3
Nuke	67	60%	0.98	14.6
Overpass	22	50%	1.04	15.3
Train	20	50%	1.15	16.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy

42.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.9%Spray accuracy

84.6%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

530msReaction time

32.9%T opening success

57.1%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

10.63HE damage / grenade

15.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.9091% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.09	31%	27 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	15%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.02	26%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	11%	25 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.02	11%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.11	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.07	13%	22 Aug →
mirage	22–20	0.02	16%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	10%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	7%	21 Aug →
nuke	12–16	0.03	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	2–13	0.00	9%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	26%	15 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	26%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	31%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	10%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.00	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.03	24%	9 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.10	29%	8 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.03	15%	4 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	12%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	11%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	13%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	22%	31 Jul →
dust2	15–19	-0.03	22%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	16%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.06	11%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.02	25%	29 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	20%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	5%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.00	19%	29 Jul →
vertigo	19–17	0.10	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	20%	28 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.09	35%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	31%	28 Jul →
vertigo	1–13	-0.08	27%	27 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.08	33%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.08	20%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	19%	24 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	18%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	21%	23 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	20%	23 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.12	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	5%	21 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	3%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	34%	16 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	15%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	24%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.13	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	15%	15 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.06	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.10	24%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.15	16%	14 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	18%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.07	17%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	20%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	14%	12 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.04	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	15%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	25%	11 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	0.07	18%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.12	23%	10 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.00	13%	10 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.06	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	18%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	20%	10 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.08	12%	10 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	10 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	5%	10 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	24%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.04	11%	24 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.10	17%	24 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.08	20%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.09	14%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.24	27%	10 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.14	15%	8 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.08	13%	8 Jun →
overpass	15–15	-0.03	13%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.06	31%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.07	12%	5 Jun →