Zeilou

Zeilou — CS2 Stats

US76561198206504209[U:1:246238481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

750Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating4,946Grey band · top ~79% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 750 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 2 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,946 +1,346 27 May4 Sept · 17 days played
3,6006,621peak 6,62127 May4 Sept
6,621Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-05-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,675 below peak (6,621)
  • -1,054 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,346 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 54 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeilouPREMIER4,946 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning40
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40582Last 10040%Win rateWLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 705ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility4.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning4.0
Utility4.5
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time663ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 25 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · cache, 18 Jun
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · office, 10 Jun
13–1Biggest win · fachwerk, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13ancientWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2281436%-0.05
dust2A138562%-0.00
mirageA106460%-0.00
fachwerkB84450%-0.04
infernoC73443%-0.03
boulderC73443%-0.04
nukeD62433%0.00
ancientD6060%-0.03
officeD62433%-0.05
anubis42250%-0.04
vertigo2020%-0.10
train21150%-0.01
overpass21150%-0.05
shelter2020%-0.07
italy1010%-0.08
debris1010%-0.25
alpine1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
65.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
657msReaction time
22.8%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
6.94HE damage / grenade
5.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.8693% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.8405% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–90.1211%25 Aug
dust21–13-0.050%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0619%11 Aug
nuke7–130.0522%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.068%8 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0729%31 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0613%31 Jul
fachwerk11–13-0.083%29 Jul
boulder13–9-0.030%29 Jul
italy5–13-0.086%29 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0415%28 Jul
dust24–13-0.0214%26 Jul
cache1–13-0.094%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.052%26 Jul
cache13–10-0.0213%26 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0314%23 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0718%23 Jul
boulder13–7-0.049%21 Jul
fachwerk13–11-0.096%21 Jul
office6–13-0.0217%20 Jul
fachwerk13–1-0.0327%20 Jul
boulder9–13-0.037%20 Jul
train5–13-0.0413%19 Jul
overpass12–12-0.0511%19 Jul
vertigo2–9-0.158%19 Jul
debris0–9-0.250%19 Jul
dust213–5-0.0315%19 Jul
cache13–4-0.0312%19 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0113%19 Jul
dust213–100.0213%19 Jul
dust213–30.0128%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0210%18 Jul
dust213–110.0120%18 Jul
boulder5–130.0014%16 Jul
fachwerk13–6-0.002%16 Jul
boulder13–8-0.0011%15 Jul
fachwerk3–13-0.095%15 Jul
inferno13–10-0.019%15 Jul
train13–40.029%13 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0411%13 Jul
office3–13-0.076%13 Jul
shelter9–13-0.0610%13 Jul
mirage13–90.097%12 Jul
fachwerk13–80.0511%11 Jul
office4–13-0.0713%11 Jul
office3–0-0.040%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0314%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0617%11 Jul
inferno9–130.0417%10 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0418%10 Jul
mirage13–10-0.056%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0130%10 Jul
boulder9–13-0.078%9 Jul
shelter10–13-0.077%9 Jul
dust213–40.0812%9 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0220%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0514%8 Jul
cache5–13-0.0526%8 Jul
cache13–6-0.062%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0612%6 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0610%5 Jul
ancient15–150.058%5 Jul
dust21–13-0.0720%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0311%3 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0511%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.064%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.067%3 Jul
cache1–13-0.0412%3 Jul
cache2–130.0026%3 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0610%3 Jul
mirage13–3-0.049%3 Jul
dust213–110.0215%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0010%2 Jul
inferno13–8-0.078%1 Jul
mirage12–160.008%30 Jun
dust213–50.0721%30 Jun
nuke13–30.0116%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.046%28 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0611%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0313%28 Jun
mirage11–10.0333%28 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0711%21 Jun
cache2–13-0.113%18 Jun
cache0–3-0.05100%18 Jun
alpine1–13-0.059%18 Jun
office13–8-0.0611%18 Jun
office3–13-0.0218%10 Jun
cache10–13-0.039%10 Jun
cache13–10-0.015%10 Jun
dust213–70.019%27 May
cache8–13-0.1018%27 May
cache7–13-0.0410%27 May
anubis6–13-0.019%26 May
cache8–13-0.0710%14 May
cache11–13-0.028%14 May
cache1–8-0.127%13 May
cache13–110.0010%13 May
cache11–13-0.0919%13 May
cache13–5-0.0521%2 May
cache13–110.0110%2 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →