NoClient

NoClient — CS2 Stats

76561198188635517[U:1:228369789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,341Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,318Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate49.2%46.2%47.2%above
Shot accuracy12.8%12.5%12.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.321.061.07above
Match win rate44.3%45.9%46.3%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNoClientFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning41
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY395110Last 10039%Win rateWWWLTWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression5.1
Utility3.6
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 673ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.1
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time664ms+62ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 664ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%+9.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
W3Current streak
511In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 53% over 15nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD1961332%0.00
infernoC167944%-0.03
ancientB158753%0.01
officeC135838%0.01
dust2B115645%-0.00
vertigoC94544%0.02
nukeD61517%-0.05
overpass41325%-0.02
cache32167%0.02
anubis2020%0.03
warden1010%-0.01
basalt1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,679Lifetime kills
1.32K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3,177Matches
44.3%Match win rate
49.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
12.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,371MVPs
1,318Hours (in match)
2,425Bombs planted
704Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,203
AWP10,326
P902,689
MAC-101,743
MP91,264
Tec-91,135

Lifetime map wins

4,797dust2
3,198inferno
1,593nuke
1,274vertigo
1,064cbble
560office
320train
185italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

244Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4245%1.0915.6
Overpass2361%1.1014.3
Inferno2152%1.1816.0
Ancient1958%0.8515.8
Dust21362%1.0814.7
Anubis956%0.9314.3
Nuke944%0.8914.9
Vertigo743%0.9617.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
673msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.0%Flash assists
7.67HE damage / grenade
2.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.0685 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8489% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10-0.0645%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0327%11 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0411%7 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0912%7 Jul
office12–120.0619%7 Jul
mirage13–20.0220%7 Jul
cache13–8-0.0524%7 Jul
cache11–130.0224%6 Jul
dust213–10-0.0315%6 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0723%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0217%6 Jul
mirage10–130.0118%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.087%6 Jul
dust211–130.1224%6 Jul
dust213–9-0.0611%6 Jul
mirage2–130.0036%6 Jul
mirage13–100.0529%5 Jul
nuke3–10-0.0750%2 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2467%2 Jul
inferno8–130.0139%2 Jul
mirage0–30.0150%2 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0427%2 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0123%2 Jul
dust211–13-0.0724%2 Jul
cache13–110.0857%2 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0220%1 Jul
ancient9–130.0024%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0219%1 Jul
dust24–3-0.0150%1 Jul
mirage13–40.0917%30 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0334%30 Jun
office13–10-0.0310%30 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0612%30 Jun
vertigo13–4-0.0933%7 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0430%3 Jun
office13–5-0.0219%3 Jun
office11–13-0.0825%2 Jun
dust213–50.0726%2 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0610%6 Mar
inferno11–130.0122%6 Mar
mirage8–130.0722%6 Mar
nuke6–130.0022%6 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0315%5 Mar
mirage3–13-0.1016%5 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0214%5 Mar
overpass13–60.0123%5 Mar
office6–13-0.0128%1 Mar
inferno13–16-0.099%1 Mar
dust212–12-0.0426%1 Mar
inferno12–120.0321%1 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0425%19 Feb
inferno10–130.0627%19 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0810%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0130%19 Feb
office8–130.0218%19 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0019%19 Feb
office13–40.0716%19 Feb
dust24–13-0.0422%19 Feb
vertigo12–12-0.0013%19 Feb
vertigo13–20.0739%19 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0612%18 Feb
ancient13–20.0715%18 Feb
ancient13–20.1514%18 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0411%18 Feb
inferno13–70.0510%18 Feb
mirage9–130.0410%13 Feb
ancient13–20.0815%13 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0413%12 Feb
warden11–13-0.0124%12 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0611%12 Feb
vertigo13–80.0719%11 Feb
office7–130.0619%11 Feb
office11–130.0418%11 Feb
overpass12–120.028%11 Feb
mirage12–120.0517%11 Feb
vertigo6–130.0319%11 Feb
office12–120.0214%11 Feb
ancient13–90.1513%11 Feb
vertigo12–120.0510%11 Feb
mirage11–130.0122%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.0712%11 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0315%11 Feb
mirage2–00.000%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0316%11 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0219%11 Feb
office13–80.0416%11 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0213%11 Feb
vertigo13–80.0816%11 Feb
office13–30.0121%11 Feb
dust213–50.0617%11 Feb
anubis11–130.0522%11 Feb
anubis7–130.0011%10 Feb
dust210–130.0315%2 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0127%1 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0727%1 Jan
basalt11–130.0521%1 Jan
office4–13-0.0419%1 Jan
ancient10–130.0123%1 Jan
vertigo12–120.0415%1 Jan
inferno13–110.0532%1 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →