No Name — CS2 Stats

GB76561198165784606[U:1:205518878]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

408Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,735Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating24,014Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9099 of 54533 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 3 median	Level 4 median	vs Level 4
Headshot rate	41.7%	42.2%	42.7%	1.0% short
Shot accuracy	15.3%	11.9%	10.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.06	0.98	1.00	above
Match win rate	44.6%	43.6%	44.1%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96

Positioning72

Utility9

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLWLWWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.6

Aggression10.0

Utility0.9

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels8.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 72% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 72% on CT to 53% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6

Positioning7.2

Utility0.9

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels7.9

Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time456ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 493ms → last ⅓ avg 456ms

Headshot accuracy24.7%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — nuke 13–3

13–0Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	36	23–13	64%	0.06
nuke	B	19	10–9	53%	0.05
anubis	S	16	11–5	69%	0.06
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
inferno	D	7	2–5	29%	0.03
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,193Lifetime kills

1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players

4,513Matches

44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players

41.7%Headshot %

15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players

11,918MVPs

1,735Hours (in match)

2,286Bombs planted

796Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,618

AWP14,930

M4A4 / M4A1-S13,405

Desert Eagle5,307

P2000 / USP-S4,680

Negev2,810

Glock-182,647

FAMAS2,093

Galil AR1,994

Knife1,379

Lifetime map wins

6,287dust2

5,494office

4,202inferno

1,470nuke

581vertigo

449train

406cbble

164italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy

41.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

6.2°Preaim

458msReaction time

53.2%T opening success

72.1%CT opening success

0.07Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

6.14HE damage / grenade

0.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.0697 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	7–13	-0.02	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	41%	20 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.04	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.16	30%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.13	31%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.10	41%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.05	23%	19 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.08	27%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.10	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.06	48%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	8%	19 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.05	24%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	44%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.16	31%	19 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	35%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	10%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.18	18%	8 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.02	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	10%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.10	32%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.01	20%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.01	23%	1 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.02	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	26%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	19%	31 Jul →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	23%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.09	32%	22 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	31%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	23%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.04	12%	22 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	13%	22 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.04	14%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.08	27%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.07	46%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.02	16%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	0%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.08	43%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.01	35%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	30%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	16%	4 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.08	21%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	23%	3 Jul →
overpass	5–13	0.06	24%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.08	24%	30 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	27%	30 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	21%	30 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.15	26%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.03	13%	29 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.08	24%	29 Jun →
anubis	16–13	0.03	26%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	45%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.26	39%	28 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.00	28%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.11	19%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.10	21%	28 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.05	29%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.11	27%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.09	26%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.13	32%	26 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.03	18%	25 Jun →
ancient	16–14	-0.04	10%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.04	21%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.14	18%	25 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.07	24%	24 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.07	20%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–16	0.02	14%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–16	0.06	26%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	22%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.05	30%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.08	24%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.14	17%	23 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.05	31%	23 Jun →
anubis	3–13	0.00	21%	23 Jun →
inferno	8–8	-0.00	33%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.03	16%	23 Jun →
dust2	1–13	0.02	28%	23 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.00	14%	22 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.04	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.00	20%	20 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.03	24%	20 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	15%	20 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	12%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.06	30%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	48%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.07	28%	20 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	18%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.07	23%	20 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.01	19%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.26	28%	19 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	20%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.07	13%	19 Jun →