bonkripper — CS2 Stats

76561198161279781[U:1:201014053]

5,494Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,116Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#808 of 16366 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,263 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

27,116Peak Premier on CSDB

3,263Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,263
Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 237 to go
Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 27,116
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,884 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning61

Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWLLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression8.4

Utility3.0

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning6.1

Utility3.0

Mechanics9.5

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time589ms+11ms

first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy32.6%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 34.6% → last ⅓ avg 32.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–0Biggest win — nuke

11Longest win streak

10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 26anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	29	13–16	45%	0.02
dust2	S	26	17–9	65%	0.03
cache	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.05
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	0.03
inferno	A	8	5–3	63%	0.03
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,915Matches

56%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

93.4ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	808	57%	1.23	19.3
Ancient	348	55%	1.18	18.5
Anubis	342	51%	1.17	18.4
Dust2	286	52%	1.12	18.5
Inferno	128	62%	1.19	18.1
Nuke	122	57%	1.14	18.6
Vertigo	88	58%	1.10	18.8
Overpass	52	67%	1.26	18.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.4%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.5%Spray accuracy

92.8%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

592msReaction time

40.4%T opening success

53.5%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

7.5%Flash assists

3.76HE damage / grenade

3.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.8704 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.02	30%	25 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	39%	25 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	30%	24 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	26%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.00	27%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.11	48%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	29%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.05	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.02	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	32%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.01	45%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.06	32%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	26%	31 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	24%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.00	100%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–1	-0.01	39%	29 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	28%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	25%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	0%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	42%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	33%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	31%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.00	34%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	43%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.18	32%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	24%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.05	31%	26 Jul →
anubis	4–11	0.02	38%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	41%	20 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.06	33%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	38%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.10	22%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.03	26%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	33%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.04	36%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.06	49%	19 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.01	43%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	25%	19 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.00	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	37%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	33%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	32%	17 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	43%	15 Jul →
cache	1–7	0.01	62%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	35%	14 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.04	29%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	33%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	31%	14 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	23%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	27%	13 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.11	35%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	29%	13 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	29%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	50%	13 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	14%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	22%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	38%	13 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.06	23%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	52%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.08	42%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.11	38%	13 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	38%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.08	26%	12 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.04	35%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	32%	12 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	20%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.07	27%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	30%	12 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.02	36%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.03	24%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	33%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	27%	11 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	70%	11 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.05	31%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.07	39%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.08	31%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	17%	10 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.06	28%	10 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.09	25%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.12	42%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	36%	10 Jul →
mirage	7–0	0.03	58%	8 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	31%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	14%	6 Jul →
mirage	0–4	-0.03	50%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	33%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	46%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	33%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.06	27%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.09	54%	3 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.08	40%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	52%	1 Jul →