ZJ-

ZJ- — CS2 Stats

76561198152435684[U:1:192169956]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

905Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#49532 of 232117 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 1 Mar 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,144 +1,595 26 Apr1 Mar · 8 days played
20,50322,144peak 22,14426 Apr1 Mar
22,144Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,452Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2024-03-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,452
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 48 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZJ-PEAK ELO2,452csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time600ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy29.9%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 3 Nov
63%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · inferno, 26 Apr
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 21 May
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 6 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2617965%0.00
infernoD1551033%-0.03
cacheS1210283%0.01
dust2A127558%0.01
nukeS96367%0.02
ancientB84450%-0.02
anubisD71614%-0.00
vertigoC52340%0.00
overpass4040%-0.01
rooftop1010%-0.09
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,486Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
69.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25549%1.0014.9
Mirage4747%0.8413.8
Ancient4650%0.9013.2
Inferno4252%0.8813.2
Nuke2966%0.9714.3
Overpass2152%0.7912.7
Cache2176%1.0414.9
Anubis2065%1.0117.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
603msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
47.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
11.72HE damage / grenade
2.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.459 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.4702% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–3-0.0131%19 Aug
inferno10–130.0016%8 Aug
cache13–70.0225%8 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0423%5 Aug
cache13–80.0544%5 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0323%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0326%21 May
dust29–13-0.0812%21 May
cache13–8-0.0125%21 May
nuke13–90.0131%18 May
vertigo9–00.1231%17 May
dust211–130.0338%14 May
overpass6–130.0119%14 May
cache13–7-0.0125%13 May
dust213–50.0429%13 May
nuke6–13-0.0512%13 May
cache13–6-0.0227%13 May
ancient8–13-0.0037%13 May
cache6–13-0.0330%9 May
cache7–13-0.0327%9 May
inferno7–13-0.0320%9 May
cache13–20.0953%9 May
cache13–9-0.0136%9 May
cache13–90.0343%9 May
dust29–130.0349%9 May
cache13–11-0.0520%9 May
inferno10–13-0.0537%8 May
mirage11–13-0.0517%8 May
cache13–70.0742%8 May
mirage16–120.0039%4 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0133%1 Apr
mirage19–160.0029%24 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0340%20 Mar
overpass9–130.0337%7 Mar
ancient13–100.0337%22 Dec
inferno13–60.1731%22 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0050%22 Dec
nuke9–70.0433%17 Dec
vertigo6–9-0.1013%16 Dec
vertigo1–9-0.1338%16 Dec
nuke9–30.1528%15 Dec
inferno1–9-0.1743%15 Dec
overpass8–8-0.0142%28 Nov
rooftop5–9-0.0933%16 Nov
inferno4–9-0.0517%16 Nov
mirage16–14-0.0236%7 Nov
inferno9–70.0634%3 Nov
vertigo9–20.1832%3 Nov
dust213–60.0523%3 Nov
dust213–40.1432%17 Oct
mirage13–11-0.0314%8 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0525%8 Mar
dust213–60.0217%2 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0022%1 Mar
mirage13–90.0720%26 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0341%26 Feb
dust24–130.0135%25 Feb
mirage7–130.0335%25 Feb
mirage22–19-0.0428%22 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0421%22 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0320%22 Feb
nuke6–130.0327%20 Feb
mirage2–90.0150%20 Feb
mirage13–60.0535%13 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0223%12 Feb
ancient7–130.0119%12 Feb
mirage13–60.0220%11 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0135%11 Feb
mirage7–130.0437%11 Feb
ancient13–100.0237%11 Feb
mirage13–100.1039%9 Feb
mirage13–50.0623%9 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0212%9 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0213%8 Feb
train11–130.0340%8 Feb
anubis11–130.0323%8 Feb
dust213–7-0.0128%8 Feb
anubis13–80.0629%8 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0312%8 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0328%8 Feb
mirage13–80.0125%4 Feb
mirage13–100.0325%1 Feb
dust213–60.0325%1 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0261%1 Feb
inferno4–9-0.1912%1 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0123%27 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0420%27 Jan
inferno10–130.0027%27 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0027%27 Jan
inferno9–6-0.0563%26 Apr
dust213–9-0.0541%26 Apr
dust215–15-0.0527%26 Apr
nuke13–70.0533%11 Apr
nuke13–00.0517%6 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0520%2 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0920%2 Mar
mirage8–130.0428%2 Mar
mirage4–13-0.1733%1 Mar
vertigo1–13-0.0632%1 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0924%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →