LONER BADBOY DEMON DRAGON

LONER BADBOY DEMON DRAGON — CS2 Stats

76561198150440055[U:1:190174327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

681Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,316Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10257 of 238997 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 681 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,316 +2,719 25 May20 Sept · 19 days played
23,59727,586peak 27,58625 May20 Sept
27,586Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,270 below peak (27,586)
  • -240 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,537 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,684 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLONER BADBOY DEMON DRAGONFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,316 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning40
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54442Last 10054%Win rateWLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.4
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time559ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 18 Jun
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 28 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 25 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 28 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25121348%-0.00
dust2A169756%-0.00
cacheS139469%0.03
infernoS129375%0.03
nukeC104640%-0.00
ancientD62433%-0.02
anubisB63350%0.05
train31233%0.01
stronghold21150%0.12
overpass220100%0.07
italy1010%0.09
alpine110100%0.11
warden110100%0.03
office1010%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,138Matches
54%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2361%1.0016.6
Dust22259%1.2217.6
Inferno2268%1.1318.4
Ancient1861%1.2115.4
Mirage1369%1.3017.1
Nuke1145%0.8913.6
Cache743%0.9116.6
Vertigo729%1.0620.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
536msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
4.63HE damage / grenade
6.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.5549% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0114%30 Aug
mirage10–130.1010%25 Aug
cache8–130.0218%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.047%20 Aug
nuke0–130.0120%20 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0922%20 Aug
ancient13–10.0317%20 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0517%20 Aug
nuke8–130.0320%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0712%18 Aug
inferno3–10.0819%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0518%17 Aug
dust213–1-0.0714%17 Aug
ancient13–50.0413%16 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0620%16 Aug
train9–130.0017%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0724%16 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0316%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0119%16 Aug
mirage0–4-0.080%15 Aug
inferno13–70.1018%15 Aug
cache11–130.0516%13 Aug
dust20–13-0.0426%13 Aug
mirage13–6-0.1516%12 Aug
dust213–1-0.0523%12 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0712%11 Aug
inferno13–10.0320%11 Aug
dust213–50.0112%11 Aug
inferno13–10.0040%11 Aug
ancient1–11-0.140%9 Aug
cache11–13-0.067%9 Aug
cache13–1-0.069%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0529%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0330%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0217%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0219%8 Aug
dust216–12-0.0622%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%8 Aug
cache13–30.0615%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0420%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0211%6 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0320%6 Aug
cache13–110.0720%4 Aug
mirage13–90.089%29 Jul
inferno8–130.0617%28 Jul
mirage7–130.0719%28 Jul
anubis8–130.0118%25 Jul
inferno13–40.0415%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0210%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0220%21 Jul
dust213–40.1425%30 Jun
nuke13–70.0931%28 Jun
cache13–00.1818%28 Jun
mirage0–13-0.03100%28 Jun
cache13–100.0821%25 Jun
mirage7–130.0035%25 Jun
stronghold12–120.1217%22 Jun
italy7–130.0916%20 Jun
train13–60.0328%20 Jun
ancient2–130.0711%20 Jun
mirage13–40.2130%18 Jun
dust210–13-0.0411%16 Jun
stronghold13–40.1122%14 Jun
dust213–00.1020%14 Jun
train9–130.000%13 Jun
mirage13–60.0123%13 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0224%13 Jun
inferno13–50.0117%13 Jun
dust213–10-0.0113%11 Jun
cache13–80.1120%10 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0126%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0224%5 Jun
alpine13–50.1119%5 Jun
warden13–70.0311%5 Jun
anubis3–130.0111%5 Jun
mirage13–90.0124%5 Jun
office10–130.0120%31 May
dust210–130.0220%31 May
anubis13–50.1118%31 May
mirage7–130.0625%31 May
cache13–110.0220%31 May
cache13–10-0.079%30 May
mirage5–13-0.0623%30 May
nuke13–11-0.0716%25 May
anubis13–50.0522%25 May
dust210–13-0.076%25 May
nuke13–7-0.0112%25 May
dust213–10-0.0415%25 May
mirage13–60.0111%25 May
dust210–130.1118%24 May
overpass13–30.1520%24 May
inferno13–70.0615%24 May
nuke9–130.048%24 May
dust29–130.0318%24 May
anubis9–130.0410%23 May
cache2–13-0.0517%17 May
inferno3–13-0.0216%17 May
mirage10–130.0118%17 May
overpass13–9-0.0018%17 May
vertigo4–13-0.0529%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →