myhre — CS2 Stats

76561198150440055[U:1:190174327]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

675Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,316Top 10% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3734 of 57521 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78

Positioning42

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8

Aggression6.0

Utility4.3

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels2.0

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8

Positioning4.2

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time543ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12nukeWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.00
dust2	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.00
cache	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
inferno	S	12	9–3	75%	0.03
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.00
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	0.05
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
stronghold	—	2	1–1	50%	0.12
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,138Matches

54%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

81.9ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	23	61%	1.00	16.6
Inferno	22	68%	1.13	18.4
Dust2	22	59%	1.22	17.6
Ancient	18	61%	1.21	15.4
Mirage	13	69%	1.30	17.1
Nuke	11	45%	0.89	13.6
Vertigo	7	29%	1.06	20.3
Cache	7	43%	0.91	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy

34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

77.2%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

527msReaction time

26.4%T opening success

49.7%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

4.33HE damage / grenade

6.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.3535% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	0.10	10%	25 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	7%	20 Aug →
nuke	0–13	0.01	20%	20 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	22%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.03	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	17%	20 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	12%	18 Aug →
inferno	3–1	0.08	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	18%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.07	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	20%	16 Aug →
train	9–13	0.00	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	24%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	16%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	0–4	-0.08	0%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.10	18%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.05	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	26%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.15	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.05	23%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.07	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.03	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.00	40%	11 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.06	7%	9 Aug →
cache	13–1	-0.06	9%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	30%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.06	22%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	14%	8 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.04	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	11%	6 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	20%	6 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	20%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	9%	29 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.07	19%	28 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.01	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.04	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	20%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	25%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.09	31%	28 Jun →
cache	13–0	0.18	18%	28 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.03	100%	28 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.08	21%	25 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.00	35%	25 Jun →
stronghold	12–12	0.12	17%	22 Jun →
italy	7–13	0.09	16%	20 Jun →
train	13–6	0.03	28%	20 Jun →
ancient	2–13	0.07	11%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.21	30%	18 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	11%	16 Jun →
stronghold	13–4	0.11	22%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.10	20%	14 Jun →
train	9–13	0.00	0%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.01	23%	13 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	24%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.01	17%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	13%	11 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.11	20%	10 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	26%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	24%	5 Jun →
alpine	13–5	0.11	19%	5 Jun →
warden	13–7	0.03	11%	5 Jun →
anubis	3–13	0.01	11%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.01	24%	5 Jun →
office	10–13	0.01	20%	31 May →
dust2	10–13	0.02	20%	31 May →
anubis	13–5	0.11	18%	31 May →
mirage	7–13	0.06	25%	31 May →
cache	13–11	0.02	20%	31 May →
cache	13–10	-0.07	9%	30 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	23%	30 May →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	16%	25 May →
anubis	13–5	0.05	22%	25 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	6%	25 May →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	12%	25 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	15%	25 May →
mirage	13–6	0.01	11%	25 May →
dust2	10–13	0.11	18%	24 May →
overpass	13–3	0.15	20%	24 May →
inferno	13–7	0.06	15%	24 May →
nuke	9–13	0.04	8%	24 May →
dust2	9–13	0.03	18%	24 May →
anubis	9–13	0.04	10%	23 May →
cache	2–13	-0.05	17%	17 May →
inferno	3–13	-0.02	16%	17 May →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	17 May →
overpass	13–9	-0.00	18%	17 May →
vertigo	4–13	-0.05	29%	9 May →
cache	12–12	0.06	27%	9 May →
nuke	4–13	0.00	24%	3 May →