Pilote FORESKINS

Pilote FORESKINS — CS2 Stats

RS76561198145505970[U:1:185240242]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

198Tracked matches46%Win rate2025Tracked since
266Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,872Light Blue band · top ~65.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40090 of 53883 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.9%42.7%44.0%5.1% short
Shot accuracy4.0%10.8%11.6%7.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.001.030.07 short
Match win rate43.5%44.1%45.1%1.6% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPilote FORESKINSFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER7,872 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning51
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55396Last 10055%Win rateLWWTWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.6
Utility2.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.1
Utility2.4
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time534ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — nuke 9–2
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA23131057%0.01
nukeS2114767%0.05
mirageD124833%0.03
anubisD113827%0.02
cacheS65183%-0.01
dust2B63350%0.03
ancientB63350%0.01
office42250%0.02
vertigo440100%0.01
poseidon32167%0.07
overpass32167%0.00
sanctum1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,282Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
1,225Matches
43.5%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
4.0%Shot accuracy
4,483MVPs
266Hours (in match)
469Bombs planted
422Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,150dust2
1,019nuke
868inferno
304vertigo
100office
79lake
72train
58safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.49Avg K/D
52.5ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke10%0.479.0
Mirage10%0.578.0
Ancient10%0.448.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.0%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.9%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
533msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
2.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0403% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3874 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.7355% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.058%10 Aug
cache13–80.0125%10 Aug
nuke13–70.017%7 Aug
dust215–15-0.0218%7 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0111%7 Aug
ancient10–130.006%6 Aug
mirage8–130.067%5 Aug
anubis7–130.115%5 Aug
mirage4–90.0314%5 Aug
mirage3–13-0.018%5 Aug
cache13–30.005%4 Aug
nuke11–130.024%4 Aug
inferno10–130.0115%4 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0417%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0614%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.056%2 Aug
anubis10–13-0.109%2 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0210%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0118%2 Aug
anubis10–130.0513%2 Aug
dust215–150.0722%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0413%1 Aug
inferno14–160.006%1 Aug
mirage13–80.059%1 Aug
anubis7–130.040%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0232%31 Jul
nuke13–50.0419%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0436%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0521%28 Jul
anubis10–130.0333%27 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0419%27 Jul
anubis7–10.096%27 Jul
mirage0–13-0.045%27 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0421%27 Jul
anubis11–13-0.035%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.059%26 Jul
nuke13–5-0.039%26 Jul
dust213–50.0821%25 Jul
cache13–80.0216%24 Jul
inferno10–130.0124%24 Jul
nuke4–13-0.017%23 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0213%23 Jul
mirage11–130.0216%23 Jul
nuke15–150.0423%23 Jul
anubis5–80.0720%22 Jul
inferno13–10.1018%22 Jul
ancient13–110.058%22 Jul
nuke13–20.1917%22 Jul
mirage13–00.0729%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.046%17 Jul
cache9–13-0.0115%17 Jul
mirage4–130.0719%17 Jul
nuke9–60.0720%16 Jul
inferno6–130.0324%15 Jul
anubis9–130.0315%15 Jul
office6–130.0111%15 Jul
nuke9–40.1514%13 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0024%5 Jul
nuke9–50.0713%5 Jul
poseidon9–70.0815%5 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0717%5 Jul
inferno9–50.2221%5 Jul
cache13–11-0.049%3 Jul
inferno13–40.0810%16 Jun
office13–10-0.0312%16 Jun
dust213–90.0612%11 Jun
nuke5–90.0113%10 Jun
dust213–40.0311%10 Jun
inferno9–7-0.029%9 Jun
inferno9–60.035%7 Jun
vertigo9–3-0.1140%7 Jun
nuke8–80.0521%6 Jun
nuke9–20.2320%6 Jun
poseidon9–60.028%6 Jun
overpass9–10.069%6 Jun
poseidon8–80.096%6 Jun
vertigo9–70.019%6 Jun
inferno9–40.033%6 Jun
inferno4–9-0.056%6 Jun
overpass4–9-0.1318%5 Jun
sanctum8–80.0519%5 Jun
nuke9–40.0522%5 Jun
nuke9–40.0733%5 Jun
nuke5–9-0.119%4 Jun
nuke9–30.080%4 Jun
vertigo9–30.0626%4 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0110%4 Jun
inferno9–60.0116%4 Jun
office11–130.0416%3 Jun
office13–40.0529%3 Jun
nuke4–9-0.030%3 Jun
overpass9–60.089%3 Jun
inferno9–70.065%3 Jun
vertigo9–40.095%3 Jun
inferno9–50.0213%3 Jun
inferno9–6-0.0613%3 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0717%2 Jun
nuke9–40.180%2 Jun
inferno9–30.128%2 Jun
nuke9–40.0721%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →