davezz — CS2 Stats

76561198143741463[U:1:183475735]✓ No bans

2,158Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#31522 of 35626 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,239 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,239Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,239
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 261 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdavezzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,239 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,239csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateLWLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression8.3
Utility6.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time525ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — vertigo 13–8
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
612In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 21dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2113862%0.00
mirageB21111052%-0.00
anubisA1811761%-0.00
infernoB157847%0.02
nukeC83538%-0.00
dust2D51420%0.01
overpassA53260%0.04
vertigo330100%0.08
cache2020%0.01
cache_b21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,610Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
79.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient39954%1.1116.2
Mirage36753%1.1016.1
Anubis27954%1.1016.5
Inferno17847%1.0515.8
Dust217643%1.0315.8
Nuke13240%1.0115.7
Overpass8156%1.0816.8
Train2857%0.9714.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
526msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
17.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.0233%24 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0018%21 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0234%21 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0128%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0614%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0233%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0220%17 Aug
mirage13–20.0622%10 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0615%10 Aug
inferno11–130.0422%7 Aug
anubis13–110.0820%1 Aug
nuke13–90.0325%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0437%31 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0429%29 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0129%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0140%23 Jul
anubis7–13-0.1018%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.059%18 Jul
dust27–13-0.0112%18 Jul
dust25–130.0121%17 Jul
dust23–13-0.0828%17 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0518%17 Jul
anubis7–130.0030%16 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0715%14 Jul
inferno13–60.0224%11 Jul
ancient8–130.0420%9 Jul
inferno13–10.1025%8 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0322%20 Jun
dust213–50.0342%18 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0421%8 Jun
ancient16–130.0623%6 Jun
inferno20–220.0322%18 May
mirage13–70.0420%17 May
mirage13–9-0.0318%15 May
mirage13–90.0116%10 May
mirage13–10-0.0126%6 May
mirage23–250.0226%6 May
mirage13–16-0.0131%5 May
mirage13–70.0211%5 May
mirage5–13-0.0526%5 May
ancient16–120.0213%5 May
vertigo13–9-0.0231%5 May
vertigo16–130.0626%3 May
ancient13–90.0819%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0135%29 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0116%28 Apr
inferno14–160.0136%27 Apr
cache11–13-0.0127%26 Apr
cache11–130.0247%26 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0119%19 Apr
nuke2–130.0134%14 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0123%13 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0326%13 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0022%12 Apr
inferno16–130.1226%9 Apr
inferno19–16-0.0614%8 Apr
mirage9–130.0016%8 Apr
anubis13–70.0122%8 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0024%7 Apr
anubis11–130.0119%4 Apr
mirage10–130.0117%2 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0019%2 Apr
ancient13–100.0425%1 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0511%1 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0022%20 Mar
overpass16–130.0012%16 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0717%12 Mar
inferno13–70.0032%11 Mar
overpass13–80.0619%8 Mar
ancient13–110.0920%26 Feb
inferno11–130.1328%25 Feb
cache_b4–13-0.0127%24 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0718%22 Feb
anubis13–20.0615%20 Feb
anubis13–90.0317%18 Feb
mirage6–13-0.1027%15 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0231%14 Feb
mirage13–90.0325%14 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0034%12 Feb
vertigo13–80.1926%12 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0228%8 Feb
mirage11–130.0519%7 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0420%5 Feb
ancient13–90.0333%4 Feb
overpass13–50.1619%2 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0020%1 Feb
nuke13–100.0819%1 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0113%1 Feb
mirage16–140.0129%31 Jan
mirage13–100.0525%31 Jan
ancient13–60.0220%31 Jan
anubis8–13-0.0214%30 Jan
cache_b19–170.0422%30 Jan
dust28–130.1027%30 Jan
inferno13–90.0420%30 Jan
anubis10–130.0317%26 Jan
ancient19–160.020%24 Jan
anubis13–40.0119%24 Jan
overpass11–130.0222%19 Jan
ancient13–3-0.0330%16 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →