Litmus — CS2 Stats

76561198133443507[U:1:173177779]

4,446Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,690Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#506 of 6947 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,104 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLitmusFACEITLevel 10 · 3,104 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,690 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression5.3
Utility6.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time524ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy29.6%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 29.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 16–12
130Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26131350%0.01
ancientB22111150%-0.00
mirageC2081240%0.01
infernoA159660%0.01
anubisC52340%0.01
cacheD51420%0.01
nuke41325%0.03
overpass3030%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,731Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.0ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient56051%1.0715.6
Anubis47247%1.0715.6
Dust237549%1.0815.6
Mirage33950%1.1016.4
Inferno18651%1.1016.1
Nuke15558%1.1717.0
Overpass9247%1.0817.4
Vertigo8455%1.0717.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.2%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
538msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
11.73HE damage / grenade
12.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3525% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.0034%25 Aug
nuke13–60.1028%25 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0133%25 Aug
ancient3–7-0.0222%23 Aug
ancient13–110.1032%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0030%23 Aug
mirage13–80.0537%21 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0228%21 Aug
dust213–50.0836%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0447%20 Aug
nuke6–130.0440%19 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0121%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0638%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0314%9 Aug
dust211–130.0231%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0036%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0022%7 Aug
dust213–20.0220%7 Aug
ancient10–130.0735%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0428%5 Aug
cache12–16-0.0326%5 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0429%21 Jul
ancient13–100.0327%19 Jul
dust213–20.0046%19 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0743%19 Jul
inferno13–0-0.020%19 Jul
dust213–40.0326%19 Jul
cache1–13-0.0147%19 Jul
dust213–110.0633%13 Jul
anubis13–30.0238%11 Jul
dust213–7-0.0112%9 Jul
mirage6–130.0233%9 Jul
ancient13–2-0.016%9 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0021%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0130%3 Jul
dust213–90.1136%3 Jul
dust213–100.0028%3 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0216%27 Jun
dust213–100.0738%24 Jun
mirage2–130.0538%24 Jun
ancient13–90.0128%23 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0133%21 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0338%21 Jun
inferno13–50.0621%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0629%21 Jun
overpass15–150.0332%21 Jun
dust213–40.0234%21 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0620%21 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0241%20 Jun
ancient8–130.0129%20 Jun
dust25–13-0.0432%20 Jun
dust213–50.0643%20 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0054%19 Jun
inferno13–60.0633%16 Jun
cache13–70.1129%16 Jun
inferno9–130.0155%14 Jun
mirage13–70.0336%14 Jun
ancient13–0-0.0140%14 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0227%14 Jun
dust211–130.0342%11 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0026%10 Jun
inferno13–40.0526%10 Jun
ancient0–6-0.030%6 Jun
dust23–13-0.0339%6 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0633%31 May
inferno13–100.0126%31 May
dust215–15-0.0123%31 May
ancient13–6-0.0017%31 May
mirage13–110.0533%30 May
mirage13–70.0245%30 May
cache2–13-0.0025%30 May
mirage8–13-0.0118%30 May
anubis15–150.0324%30 May
mirage11–130.0330%27 May
ancient13–60.0219%27 May
ancient13–20.0126%27 May
dust21–13-0.0463%27 May
inferno13–50.0750%27 May
dust212–16-0.0131%27 May
mirage13–60.0730%25 May
inferno6–13-0.0125%25 May
anubis6–13-0.040%25 May
ancient7–13-0.0126%23 May
mirage9–130.0011%23 May
ancient13–8-0.0025%23 May
dust21–13-0.0126%23 May
dust215–150.0519%22 May
dust213–9-0.0128%22 May
cache8–13-0.0230%22 May
dust20–10-0.0833%21 May
dust20–13-0.0133%21 May
ancient3–13-0.0319%21 May
anubis1–130.0240%21 May
mirage16–120.1432%21 May
inferno13–5-0.0131%21 May
mirage0–13-0.020%21 May
dust213–90.0233%21 May
mirage10–13-0.0726%19 May
ancient13–4-0.0633%19 May
inferno13–90.0630%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →