MWMWMWMWMWMVMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMVMWMW

MWMWMWMWMWMVMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMVMWMW — CS2 Stats

US76561198133189969[U:1:172924241]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,690Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,641Pink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7175 of 21402 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,641Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,641
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,359 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMWMWMWMWMWMVMWMWMWMWMWMWM…PREMIER21,641 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning50
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.9
Utility3.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.0
Utility3.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time616ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 28infernoWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28171161%-0.00
dust2B25131252%-0.03
nukeB179853%-0.03
infernoC156940%-0.03
cacheA116555%-0.01
ancient31233%-0.01
anubis1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
83%Win rate
1.50Avg K/D
100.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2100%1.4620.0
Nuke10%1.0019.0
Mirage1100%1.8322.0
Dust21100%1.7319.0
Ancient1100%1.5323.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
611msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
3.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3873 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0121%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0111%21 Aug
cache13–20.0531%18 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0814%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0130%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0718%18 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0517%18 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0013%12 Aug
dust26–13-0.0815%12 Aug
mirage13–30.1118%12 Aug
nuke13–90.0025%11 Aug
dust216–12-0.0215%11 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0940%11 Aug
cache13–30.0432%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0117%10 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0424%10 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0314%9 Aug
nuke11–130.0119%8 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0215%7 Aug
cache8–13-0.096%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.027%5 Aug
cache4–130.0018%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0924%5 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0116%5 Aug
inferno0–10-0.069%5 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0226%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0324%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0119%4 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0119%4 Aug
dust216–12-0.0419%4 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0213%4 Aug
dust213–7-0.0420%4 Aug
dust213–7-0.0312%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0615%3 Aug
cache15–15-0.0519%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0423%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0618%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0218%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0027%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0317%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0215%31 Jul
dust213–20.0131%31 Jul
cache13–70.018%31 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0520%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0628%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0316%30 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0120%30 Jul
dust215–15-0.0316%30 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0225%29 Jul
mirage1–7-0.060%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0720%29 Jul
cache3–13-0.0241%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0614%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0426%29 Jul
cache13–10-0.0518%18 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0720%18 Jul
dust213–5-0.0720%18 Jul
cache13–50.0217%18 Jul
nuke13–60.0414%18 Jul
nuke13–5-0.058%17 Jul
nuke13–60.0225%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0717%17 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0623%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.064%17 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0126%17 Jul
inferno0–13-0.0133%15 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0527%11 Jul
dust27–13-0.0112%11 Jul
dust215–15-0.0429%11 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0711%10 Jul
dust211–13-0.0325%10 Jul
dust213–7-0.0618%10 Jul
dust211–13-0.0516%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0411%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0135%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0211%9 Jul
mirage8–10.0657%9 Jul
dust213–100.0123%9 Jul
mirage13–100.0221%9 Jul
cache16–14-0.038%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0313%9 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0217%30 Jun
inferno5–12-0.075%30 Jun
nuke6–13-0.064%29 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0238%29 Jun
nuke13–80.0443%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0219%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0125%28 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0111%27 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0719%27 Jun
dust25–130.0224%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.0312%25 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0624%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0213%24 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0114%23 Jun
inferno13–90.0138%23 Jun
dust213–10-0.0032%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0521%23 Jun
mirage13–100.0226%16 Jun
dust213–9-0.0124%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →