snafu

snafu — CS2 Stats

76561198129951074[U:1:169685346]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,315Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating30,833Top 1% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#175 of 251228 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,095 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,833 +296 20 Aug – 29 Sept · 14 days played
30,33930,833peak 30,83320 Aug29 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,095 +0 28 Aug – 20 Sept · 8 observations
2,0952,095peak 2,09528 Aug20 Sept
30,887Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,095Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,095
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 405 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 30,833
  • +330 over 30 days · steady
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Gold band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnafuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,095 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER30,833 · Gold band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,095csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning67
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT65–31–4Last 10065%Win rateWLWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.7
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time488ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 488ms → last ⅓ avg 488ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 5 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 26 Aug →
313msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · dust2, 18 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 11mirageWeakest map · 50% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2918–1162%0.00
infernoA149–564%0.03
mirageB147–750%0.03
nukeS119–282%0.04
ancientA106–460%0.07
cacheS108–280%0.03
anubisS97–278%0.05
train—21–150%0.05
office—10–10%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,176Matches
53%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36757%1.0415.0
Ancient20952%1.0515.8
Dust214050%1.0015.4
Anubis7253%1.0115.0
Nuke7254%0.9714.1
Inferno5834%0.9714.9
Overpass4650%1.0916.0
Cache4154%1.0416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
499msReaction time
63.8%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
8.79HE damage / grenade
7.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4738 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0011%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0637%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.0823%9 Oct →
dust213–90.0220%9 Oct →
nuke2–10.0014%9 Oct →
anubis13–10.0524%9 Oct →
inferno13–60.0125%8 Oct →
inferno4–130.0020%8 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0319%8 Oct →
dust213–50.0616%8 Oct →
train13–40.0624%8 Oct →
inferno9–130.0824%7 Oct →
ancient7–130.0518%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0712%7 Oct →
anubis11–130.0617%5 Oct →
mirage13–90.2614%5 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.030%29 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0236%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0420%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0019%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.067%23 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0210%21 Sept →
dust213–10.0121%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.1228%20 Sept →
dust29–1-0.0220%18 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0628%17 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0323%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0113%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0019%16 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0428%15 Sept →
nuke4–130.0311%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0116%15 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0112%15 Sept →
dust213–90.0519%15 Sept →
dust213–30.0611%14 Sept →
ancient13–50.0710%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.0125%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0223%12 Sept →
ancient13–30.1119%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.1131%12 Sept →
anubis13–90.0522%12 Sept →
ancient11–130.0417%12 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0320%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0429%12 Sept →
nuke5–130.1629%12 Sept →
cache7–130.1121%12 Sept →
mirage4–130.0811%12 Sept →
dust213–70.0923%11 Sept →
nuke13–80.0017%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0725%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0416%9 Sept →
cache13–100.0223%7 Sept →
inferno13–80.0720%7 Sept →
train12–120.0517%7 Sept →
nuke9–30.0110%7 Sept →
cache13–90.1624%7 Sept →
cache13–100.0510%6 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0118%6 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0632%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0822%5 Sept →
cache10–130.0219%4 Sept →
mirage12–120.0218%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0616%4 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0316%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0427%3 Sept →
inferno13–50.0830%2 Sept →
office10–130.1230%2 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0819%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.0711%2 Sept →
anubis13–90.0218%31 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0324%31 Aug →
anubis13–100.0332%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0321%30 Aug →
dust213–70.0521%30 Aug →
anubis13–90.0624%30 Aug →
dust213–40.0124%30 Aug →
cache13–60.0318%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0618%29 Aug →
ancient13–10.0932%29 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0126%29 Aug →
dust212–120.0329%29 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0520%29 Aug →
anubis9–130.0330%28 Aug →
cache13–11-0.048%28 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0143%26 Aug →
inferno13–40.0717%26 Aug →
anubis13–10.0517%22 Aug →
dust26–130.0124%22 Aug →
inferno13–70.059%22 Aug →
dust213–110.0926%22 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0320%22 Aug →
inferno13–60.0032%21 Aug →
mirage13–50.1320%21 Aug →
nuke13–50.0616%21 Aug →
ancient13–80.1220%21 Aug →
ancient6–130.0027%21 Aug →
dust213–80.0124%20 Aug →
dust21–13-0.090%20 Aug →
dust213–70.0327%20 Aug →
ancient13–90.0918%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.