linn0

linn0 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198129539654[U:1:169273926]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,355Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,000Top 25% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41880 of 251852 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,185 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,000 +273 7 May – 12 Oct · 12 days played
21,51723,000peak 23,0007 May12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,185 +0 5 Sept – 27 Sept · 4 observations
2,1852,185peak 2,1855 Sept27 Sept
23,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,185Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-05-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,185
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 315 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,000
  • +531 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-27
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlinn0FACEITLevel 9 · 2,185 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,185csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning62
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.2
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time551ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 24 Jun →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 19 Aug →
398msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 10 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 7 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2012–860%-0.00
nukeA1810–856%-0.00
ancientB178–947%-0.01
infernoD164–1225%-0.04
dust2A106–460%-0.01
anubisA95–456%-0.00
mirageS86–275%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.06
overpass—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,983Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient40955%1.0515.7
Anubis29352%1.0515.3
Nuke28851%1.0615.7
Mirage22945%0.9514.6
Inferno18849%1.0315.1
Dust217241%0.9614.6
Overpass8652%1.0815.6
Train6047%0.9714.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.7%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
549msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
7.29HE damage / grenade
21.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6154% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–13-0.028%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0614%12 Oct →
dust213–30.0420%12 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0013%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0025%9 Oct →
dust213–10.0433%9 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0526%8 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0218%7 Oct →
cache10–130.0718%5 Oct →
ancient16–140.0513%28 Sept →
anubis7–130.0319%27 Sept →
inferno16–12-0.0110%25 Sept →
inferno0–10-0.0617%25 Sept →
cache13–110.0112%22 Sept →
anubis13–80.0723%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0125%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
nuke13–40.0426%21 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0230%19 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0633%13 Sept →
cache19–170.0423%12 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0531%7 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0419%6 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0220%6 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
ancient13–160.0220%29 Aug →
nuke13–50.0718%27 Aug →
cache16–140.0319%27 Aug →
anubis13–30.0014%27 Aug →
ancient13–100.0026%24 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.017%20 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0241%19 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0314%18 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0520%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0822%17 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0517%17 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0228%16 Aug →
mirage13–100.0719%15 Aug →
nuke11–130.0119%13 Aug →
ancient6–130.0115%13 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0523%12 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0220%12 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0218%12 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0131%9 Aug →
inferno0–13-0.0329%7 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0118%5 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0628%5 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0116%1 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0713%31 Jul →
ancient13–100.0315%31 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0427%28 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0120%25 Jul →
nuke10–130.0320%25 Jul →
dust213–80.0025%23 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0413%23 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0430%23 Jul →
ancient13–90.0515%23 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0618%23 Jul →
inferno15–19-0.0114%20 Jul →
cache15–19-0.0716%20 Jul →
cache13–8-0.1019%13 Jul →
nuke16–140.0330%13 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0419%13 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0415%13 Jul →
mirage13–100.0422%12 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0215%12 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0130%10 Jul →
ancient16–140.0121%9 Jul →
cache13–50.0227%9 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0228%9 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.089%30 Jun →
cache13–110.0318%27 Jun →
dust213–2-0.0415%27 Jun →
mirage13–40.0920%27 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0418%27 Jun →
vertigo13–11-0.0623%27 Jun →
mirage13–60.1026%24 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0221%23 Jun →
anubis13–50.0513%23 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0418%23 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0017%23 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0129%20 Jun →
ancient9–130.0124%10 Jun →
nuke13–100.0426%10 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.080%6 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0233%28 May →
nuke11–13-0.0122%17 May →
cache13–6-0.0319%17 May →
cache13–90.0623%14 May →
inferno11–130.0219%14 May →
dust213–8-0.019%14 May →
anubis10–13-0.0223%13 May →
nuke13–90.0239%13 May →
overpass13–30.0426%13 May →
cache12–12-0.0226%8 May →
inferno13–30.0219%7 May →
cache9–13-0.0416%7 May →
ancient8–13-0.0222%7 May →
cache13–00.0717%7 May →
cache12–12-0.0315%7 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.