bub☂☁ — CS2 Stats

US76561198128131234[U:1:167865506]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,871Tracked matches69%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.9 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating22,158Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim99

Positioning72

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.9

Aggression10.0

Utility3.1

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels7.1

Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 99 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.9

Positioning7.2

Utility3.1

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels7.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time446ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 446ms

Headshot accuracy34.5%+3.3%

first ⅓ avg 31.2% → last ⅓ avg 34.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 8–13

13–2Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	66	36–30	55%	0.03
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.03
mirage	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

184Matches

45%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

84.4ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	64	55%	1.35	18.9
Mirage	42	33%	1.12	17.6
Inferno	26	50%	1.21	18.3
Ancient	23	52%	1.11	16.5
Nuke	9	33%	1.23	17.0
Overpass	6	17%	1.02	18.3
Anubis	5	0%	0.77	12.4
Train	4	50%	1.21	21.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

34.4%Headshot accuracy

45.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

85.8%Counter-strafing

5.5°Preaim

450msReaction time

56.0%T opening success

61.0%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

10.5%Flash assists

6.08HE damage / grenade

1.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 1.2431 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–7	0.06	6%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	55%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	25%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.11	38%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	38%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.12	41%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	50%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	26%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	30%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–4	0.02	0%	27 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.05	37%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.02	50%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	21%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	30%	27 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	44%	26 Aug →
dust2	5–3	0.03	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	47%	26 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.02	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	26%	25 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	31%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.12	62%	25 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	31%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	50%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	42%	25 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.04	31%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	28%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	25%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	32%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–10	0.04	31%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.03	44%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	50%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	46%	23 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.01	22%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	21%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	19%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	36%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	31%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.01	14%	22 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	57%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	32%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	3–12	-0.04	38%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	44%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	26%	22 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.01	35%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.12	23%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	21%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	25%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	57%	21 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.00	38%	21 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.05	44%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.08	60%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	19%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	28%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.08	43%	20 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	45%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	27%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	38%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	36%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	25%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	27%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.04	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	32%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.06	32%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	28%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	39%	17 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.05	13%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	38%	17 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.06	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	35%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	29%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	31%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.11	38%	17 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	28%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	26%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	30%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.05	31%	15 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.09	48%	15 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	42%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.03	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.09	35%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.01	50%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	0%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	60%	14 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	17%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.06	42%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.07	30%	14 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	50%	14 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.05	25%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	20%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.08	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.03	23%	11 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	38%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	36%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	41%	10 Aug →