McKN1GHT — CS2 Stats

76561198119611779[U:1:159346051]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,249Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since

2,755Hours in CS31Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

Premier CS Rating4,351Grey band · top ~81.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19970 of 25831 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Light Blue band median	vs Light Blue band
Headshot rate	29.2%	40.1%	10.9% short
Shot accuracy	16.9%	7.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.99	0.92	above
Match win rate	28.5%	42.2%	13.7% short

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37

Positioning45

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–59–1Last 10040%Win rateWLWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7

Aggression6.9

Utility5.8

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7

Positioning4.5

Utility5.8

Mechanics2.3

Opening Duels3.7

Win Impact3.9

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time615ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy13.0%+3.3%

first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — inferno 13–8

13–2Biggest win — mirage

3Longest win streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	26	11–15	42%	-0.03
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.03
dust2	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
cache	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.01
anubis	D	13	3–10	23%	-0.03
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,314Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

5,718Matches

28.5%Match win rate

29.2%Headshot %

16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players

5,686MVPs

1,447Hours (in match)

2,945Bombs planted

561Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,302

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,905

AWP8,523

P904,093

MAC-103,745

P2000 / USP-S3,228

SG 5533,213

Desert Eagle3,078

Galil AR3,046

Negev2,965

Lifetime map wins

8,759dust2

3,555inferno

1,543nuke

366train

353cbble

329lake

197ar_shoots

185safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy

35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.1%Spray accuracy

60.2%Counter-strafing

13.8°Preaim

618msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

55.6%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

8.24HE damage / grenade

18.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.808° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.3209% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–8	0.06	13%	29 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	12%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	5%	27 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	11%	27 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	19%	27 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.03	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.12	13%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	18%	26 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	17%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.05	14%	26 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.12	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.00	6%	25 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	8%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	19%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.07	12%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	13%	21 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	8%	21 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	17%	20 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	8%	20 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	17%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	6%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.09	9%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.01	9%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.09	10%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	15%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	19%	19 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	17%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	11%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	7%	17 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	12%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.09	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	18%	17 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.06	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.05	9%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	10%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	10%	16 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	7%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	4%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	11%	14 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.03	10%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	3%	13 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.13	8%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	11%	13 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.10	10%	13 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	9%	12 Aug →
cache	0–13	0.02	11%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.05	16%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	17%	12 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	4%	12 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.09	12%	12 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	3%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.00	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	8%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.00	10%	10 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	13%	10 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	23%	10 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.00	23%	10 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	11%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	10%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	13%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	14%	6 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	12%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	9%	6 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	6%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	10%	6 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.00	7%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.06	5%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	2%	6 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	16%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	3%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	10%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	6%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	10%	30 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	17%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	10%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	9%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.05	7%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.09	12%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	4%	25 Jul →
office	6–13	-0.01	7%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.08	7%	23 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	3%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.07	9%	22 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.01	5%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	11%	20 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.00	7%	20 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	17%	20 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	10%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.00	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	12%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.00	14%	19 Jul →