mother

mother — CS2 Stats

76561198118877058[U:1:158611330]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,468Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,638 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,638 → 2,638
+2Tracked matches · now 1,468
0.0ppWin rate · 65.5% → 65.5%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 18 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,677 -8,162 18 Dec28 May · 10 days played
22,27731,096peak 31,09618 Dec28 May
Faceit ELO: 2,638 +0 13 Sept19 Sept · 2 observations
2,6382,638peak 2,63813 Sept19 Sept
31,096Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,638Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2025-12-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,638
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 362 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmotherFACEITLevel 10 · 2,638 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,638csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning66
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54424Last 10054%Win rateLWWWTLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.2
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time552ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–6 · nuke, 5 Apr
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 19 Dec
383msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 31 May
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 8 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 12nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%0.02
infernoA1710759%0.00
ancientS1712571%0.01
nukeD123925%0.02
overpassS1210283%0.03
cache43175%0.03
train41325%-0.00
anubis31233%-0.01
stronghold32167%0.05
sanctum21150%-0.03
palacio2020%-0.05
debris1010%-0.04
mirage110100%0.07
warden1010%-0.03
golden110100%0.03
office1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,511Matches
60%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
73.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11351%1.0415.7
Dust29955%0.9814.6
Inferno7765%1.0514.1
Overpass5763%1.1714.7
Nuke5461%1.1515.4
Mirage3342%1.0314.1
Train3174%1.2116.2
Cache2955%1.1714.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
552msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
11.53HE damage / grenade
10.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.9833% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
debris6–9-0.0418%24 Aug
inferno13–110.0224%19 Aug
nuke16–130.0311%19 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0121%18 Aug
dust215–150.0214%18 Aug
nuke9–130.0326%29 Jul
dust28–130.0116%29 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0412%5 Jun
inferno1–13-0.098%4 Jun
cache13–9-0.0315%2 Jun
ancient13–50.0332%31 May
nuke13–110.0717%28 May
overpass13–11-0.0113%20 May
overpass13–20.1013%17 May
dust20–3-0.060%11 May
inferno13–80.1217%11 May
ancient6–130.0013%10 May
dust211–130.0322%10 May
ancient16–12-0.0110%9 May
ancient6–13-0.0514%9 May
inferno14–160.0316%8 May
overpass13–10.0218%8 May
ancient13–5-0.0213%4 May
dust213–80.0924%3 May
anubis8–130.0325%3 May
inferno13–7-0.0030%3 May
cache9–130.0231%3 May
overpass13–40.0835%3 May
cache13–30.0527%3 May
overpass13–2-0.0110%3 May
cache13–50.0721%3 May
inferno16–120.0218%26 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0313%26 Apr
overpass13–60.0120%12 Apr
nuke9–130.0117%12 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0228%12 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0120%11 Apr
ancient13–50.0128%11 Apr
nuke4–11-0.0627%11 Apr
dust213–90.0321%11 Apr
ancient13–20.0712%11 Apr
inferno13–80.0132%10 Apr
sanctum9–4-0.0025%5 Apr
nuke9–60.2127%5 Apr
inferno7–90.0015%5 Apr
ancient13–1-0.039%4 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0437%4 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0617%3 Apr
dust28–13-0.0223%3 Apr
stronghold13–100.0235%3 Apr
dust213–70.0319%3 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0115%31 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0119%29 Mar
inferno16–130.0018%29 Mar
ancient13–60.1121%29 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0115%28 Mar
ancient10–130.0817%28 Mar
dust213–110.0122%28 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0116%27 Mar
ancient13–90.0122%27 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0122%27 Mar
overpass13–80.0726%27 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0720%16 Mar
dust213–40.1015%16 Mar
overpass13–90.0320%15 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0626%15 Mar
sanctum8–8-0.0514%15 Mar
dust216–140.1114%22 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0312%22 Feb
dust213–11-0.059%19 Feb
overpass13–50.0221%19 Feb
mirage13–110.0720%1 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0422%30 Jan
stronghold5–13-0.0024%26 Jan
dust29–130.0730%24 Jan
warden7–13-0.0312%24 Jan
stronghold13–80.1326%24 Jan
dust28–130.0423%12 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0314%12 Jan
overpass13–20.0735%12 Jan
train3–13-0.0515%11 Jan
nuke6–130.0325%11 Jan
dust212–120.0128%11 Jan
train10–13-0.0115%10 Jan
palacio0–13-0.0833%10 Jan
palacio7–13-0.0313%2 Jan
golden13–10.039%2 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0218%2 Jan
train11–130.0420%2 Jan
inferno3–130.0229%2 Jan
office10–130.0214%21 Dec
dust213–90.0426%20 Dec
ancient16–140.0212%20 Dec
dust23–13-0.0325%20 Dec
train13–8-0.0024%19 Dec
inferno15–150.0818%19 Dec
ancient13–50.0326%19 Dec
dust29–13-0.0038%19 Dec
nuke14–160.0317%18 Dec
dust213–100.0521%18 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →