ryst1ć — CS2 Stats

76561198115217052[U:1:154951324]Steam profile ↗

5,324Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,391Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3499 of 18895 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,207 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning63

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression8.3

Utility6.1

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning6.3

Utility6.1

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time510ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy26.5%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–8

13–0Biggest win — ancient

4Longest win streak

3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 25dust2Weakest map · 19% over 26

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	D	26	5–21	19%	-0.00
ancient	S	25	18–7	72%	0.05
cache	A	22	13–9	59%	0.03
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	0.04
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
inferno	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
mirage	—	2	1–1	50%	0.11
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,791Matches

53%Win rate

1.30Avg K/D

81.3ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	145	54%	1.23	16.9
Dust2	75	39%	1.13	17.3
Overpass	59	47%	1.18	15.6
Anubis	54	54%	1.22	17.4
Cache	53	62%	1.51	18.6
Inferno	46	52%	1.46	17.4
Train	32	72%	1.16	14.5
Thera	17	65%	1.48	19.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.4%Spray accuracy

83.7%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

520msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

57.6%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

4.2%Flash assists

11.04HE damage / grenade

10.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4513 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.6616% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–10	0.08	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	15–19	0.04	14%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.16	30%	27 Aug →
cache	17–19	0.06	26%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	23%	26 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.06	33%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	27%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	23%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	25%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	21%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.09	23%	23 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	24%	23 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	23%	22 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	1–2	0.04	50%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	30%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	28%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	29%	22 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	21%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	29%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.07	31%	21 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	21%	21 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.02	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	22%	20 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.06	32%	19 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	44%	19 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	35%	19 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.04	30%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	21%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	33%	18 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.04	22%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	33%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.04	43%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	29%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	33%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	33%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	46%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–0	0.06	38%	15 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	23%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	12%	15 Aug →
ancient	16–19	0.02	27%	15 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	33%	15 Aug →
dust2	16–19	0.04	32%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.03	24%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.07	18%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.05	32%	14 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	26%	12 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.05	35%	12 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.09	31%	12 Aug →
dust2	20–22	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.01	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	46%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	25%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	34%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	35%	7 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.01	18%	7 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	25%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.05	24%	7 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	27%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	26%	6 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	25%	6 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	28%	5 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.07	48%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	9%	5 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	30%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	24%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.13	30%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	18%	4 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.04	12%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	30%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	25%	30 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	39%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.03	14%	30 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.01	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.09	18%	27 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.07	35%	27 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	26%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.21	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.02	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.14	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.09	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	25%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.05	26%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.12	30%	21 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.07	35%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.15	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–19	0.09	16%	20 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.07	22%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	27%	19 Jul →
fachwerk	13–3	0.16	24%	19 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	31%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	31%	19 Jul →