little femboy fella

little femboy fella — CS2 Stats

NL76561198092206448[U:1:131940720]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

317Tracked matches87%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.1 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating31,561Top 1% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86 of 261493 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (46 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 317 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 31,561 +10,847 13 Jul – 29 Sept · 31 days played
20,71431,836peak 31,83613 Jul29 Sept
31,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2023-05-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 275 below peak (31,836)
  • +868 over 30 days · improving
  • +10,847 over 90 days
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Gold band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlittle femboy fellaFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER31,561 · Gold bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim100
Positioning61
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY80–20Last 10080%Win rateWWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +27.1pp headshot accuracy · −219ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.19
  • Avg headshot accuracy 67%
  • Avg reaction 156ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 56%
  • Avg reaction 177ms

Last 20

  • 17–3 · 85% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 42%
  • Avg reaction 287ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim10.0
Utility5.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.7

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 100 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim10.0
Positioning6.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.09+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.09
Reaction time301ms−287ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 301ms
Headshot accuracy36.7%+9.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 36.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.45Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 14 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 10 Sept →
78msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · mirage, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

25Longest win streak
W5Current streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 7anubisWeakest map · 67% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS5042–884%0.08
dust2S2418–675%0.05
anubisS96–367%0.07
cacheS77–0100%0.06
ancientS54–180%0.08
nuke—22–0100%0.04
inferno—21–150%0.05
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (67% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

40.7%Headshot accuracy
69.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
56.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
2.7°Preaim
278msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
19.75HE damage / grenade
1.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.9656 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1744% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–00.1333%16 Sept →
mirage13–90.4588%14 Sept →
mirage13–100.3179%14 Sept →
dust213–40.0685%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0050%10 Sept →
mirage11–130.0240%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.01100%10 Sept →
anubis13–00.080%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.0229%9 Sept →
dust213–10.0457%9 Sept →
mirage1–40.0750%9 Sept →
mirage9–50.1634%8 Sept →
mirage9–00.0925%8 Sept →
mirage13–00.1013%8 Sept →
mirage13–20.0531%7 Sept →
ancient13–10.0424%6 Sept →
mirage13–00.2146%6 Sept →
mirage13–00.0643%6 Sept →
dust213–30.0214%6 Sept →
mirage4–20.059%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0913%5 Sept →
dust26–10.2443%5 Sept →
cache8–00.0624%30 Aug →
mirage2–130.0127%30 Aug →
mirage13–10.0914%29 Aug →
mirage13–00.0875%29 Aug →
ancient13–00.020%29 Aug →
mirage13–00.0821%29 Aug →
mirage13–00.029%29 Aug →
mirage13–80.1837%22 Aug →
mirage13–20.1433%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0333%22 Aug →
dust25–0-0.0033%22 Aug →
mirage13–20.0836%22 Aug →
mirage13–10.1256%22 Aug →
anubis13–10.2350%22 Aug →
mirage13–20.0623%21 Aug →
cache6–10.1856%21 Aug →
mirage1–8-0.0431%12 Aug →
dust213–60.1650%11 Aug →
dust213–70.0613%11 Aug →
anubis8–70.1130%30 Jul →
anubis13–00.1430%29 Jul →
mirage13–90.3021%29 Jul →
dust213–30.1941%27 Jul →
anubis13–00.0425%25 Jul →
dust213–00.0118%25 Jul →
mirage13–00.000%25 Jul →
dust213–00.0113%25 Jul →
anubis13–00.0080%25 Jul →
mirage3–00.1931%25 Jul →
mirage13–00.056%25 Jul →
mirage13–00.0631%25 Jul →
mirage13–10.0313%25 Jul →
mirage13–00.0118%25 Jul →
mirage2–00.03100%25 Jul →
mirage13–20.0322%25 Jul →
dust213–90.0224%24 Jul →
cache13–100.0630%23 Jul →
dust213–60.0320%23 Jul →
mirage13–0-0.0213%22 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0433%22 Jul →
dust213–1-0.0340%22 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0227%22 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0127%22 Jul →
cache13–10.0841%21 Jul →
nuke13–30.0545%21 Jul →
dust22–7-0.0129%20 Jul →
cache13–30.0056%20 Jul →
mirage13–60.0133%20 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.040%20 Jul →
cache13–50.0132%17 Jul →
ancient11–30.0728%17 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0129%17 Jul →
mirage13–30.0727%17 Jul →
dust213–110.1026%17 Jul →
cache13–00.0020%13 Jul →
mirage1–6-0.0022%13 Jul →
mirage7–20.0431%13 Jul →
mirage13–110.0322%13 Jul →
dust22–50.0831%13 Jul →
mirage13–30.0311%13 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.037%12 Jul →
anubis13–60.1222%12 Jul →
inferno2–60.0244%12 Jul →
dust20–40.01100%12 Jul →
dust20–13-0.0414%12 Jul →
dust213–40.0823%12 Jul →
mirage8–130.0315%12 Jul →
dust210–130.0730%12 Jul →
ancient10–130.1026%12 Jul →
mirage13–30.1426%12 Jul →
mirage13–100.0722%10 Jul →
mirage13–90.0928%10 Jul →
mirage13–100.1340%10 Jul →
ancient13–60.1829%27 Jun →
mirage13–80.1326%16 Jun →
inferno13–40.0819%16 Jun →
anubis17–19-0.019%3 May →
vertigo8–160.0117%3 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches25-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.