MaxCS2_ — CS2 Stats

76561198090288460[U:1:130022732]

2,554Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,962Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9768 of 27084 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,675 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaxCS2_FACEITLevel 7 · 1,675 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,962 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning48
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWLTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression5.9
Utility4.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time590ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — overpass 13–8
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA1911858%-0.00
dust2D1961332%-0.03
anubisA1710759%-0.02
cacheB147750%-0.04
nukeB126650%-0.02
infernoA85363%-0.02
mirageB63350%-0.01
overpass43175%0.03
vertigo110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

737Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12847%0.9314.6
Ancient10550%0.9814.9
Vertigo7561%0.9914.8
Inferno4441%0.8714.5
Nuke3551%0.9815.9
Dust23367%1.1114.6
Mirage2934%0.9414.0
Overpass2050%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
572msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
7.53HE damage / grenade
7.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4574 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7585% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–120.0217%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0320%28 Aug
anubis13–40.0119%28 Aug
cache11–130.0420%28 Aug
anubis13–8-0.050%28 Aug
dust21–12-0.0630%28 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0423%27 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0019%27 Aug
dust213–5-0.038%26 Aug
ancient13–90.0528%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.0621%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0831%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0633%24 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0244%24 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0114%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0216%23 Aug
cache16–13-0.0417%23 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0727%23 Aug
nuke15–150.0233%22 Aug
cache13–10.0317%22 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0430%22 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0418%22 Aug
ancient15–150.0844%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0128%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.0337%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.130%20 Aug
cache13–11-0.0339%18 Aug
anubis13–160.0135%18 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0616%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0438%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0125%15 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0220%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0715%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.1222%13 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0121%13 Aug
dust213–9-0.0726%13 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0417%10 Aug
ancient13–90.0022%10 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0433%8 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0835%4 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0324%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0627%3 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0615%3 Aug
nuke8–130.0627%31 Jul
ancient13–20.0721%31 Jul
nuke13–40.0031%31 Jul
cache13–7-0.0812%31 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0426%31 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0014%31 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0143%29 Jul
anubis9–20.0123%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0125%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0322%22 Jul
cache13–5-0.0517%22 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0622%21 Jul
cache1–13-0.1042%19 Jul
mirage13–40.0720%18 Jul
ancient11–20.0115%17 Jul
inferno13–20.0127%16 Jul
ancient8–130.0222%15 Jul
anubis8–130.0121%15 Jul
dust216–14-0.0126%15 Jul
dust29–13-0.0113%14 Jul
anubis16–140.0413%12 Jul
anubis13–110.0019%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0211%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.017%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0619%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0616%10 Jul
cache13–50.0933%10 Jul
cache15–15-0.0515%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.0711%9 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0219%9 Jul
dust213–2-0.0021%9 Jul
dust26–13-0.0236%8 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0519%8 Jul
vertigo13–60.0623%7 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0711%6 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0217%6 Jul
overpass13–80.1124%6 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0221%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0419%3 Jul
overpass6–130.0716%3 Jul
dust213–60.0126%1 Jul
dust29–13-0.0525%29 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0413%29 Jun
dust24–13-0.0816%29 Jun
dust28–130.0338%29 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0519%29 Jun
anubis13–80.0131%29 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0323%28 Jun
dust214–16-0.0413%28 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0327%28 Jun
dust213–00.0538%28 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0211%27 Jun
mirage16–120.0529%27 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0056%27 Jun
ancient10–1-0.060%26 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0713%26 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0329%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →