Abstruse — CS2 Stats

76561198084806733[U:1:124541005]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,119Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,173 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning61

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–31–7Last 10062%Win rateWLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression9.8

Utility5.7

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.1

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time553ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy24.3%+4.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — inferno 9–2

13–1Biggest win — nuke

7Longest win streak

13–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 92% over 12nukeWeakest map · 50% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	36	19–17	53%	0.05
mirage	B	13	7–6	54%	0.08
anubis	S	12	11–1	92%	0.03
dust2	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
cache	S	10	9–1	90%	0.04
overpass	A	7	4–3	57%	0.06
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,594Matches

53%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

75.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	97	52%	0.97	15.0
Anubis	96	48%	1.09	15.2
Ancient	79	46%	0.99	14.4
Inferno	61	62%	1.05	14.6
Dust2	51	55%	1.04	14.9
Vertigo	48	58%	1.01	14.4
Nuke	39	64%	1.08	14.6
Cache	38	63%	1.27	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy

40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.7%Spray accuracy

82.2%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

547msReaction time

30.4%T opening success

60.3%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

3.5%Flash assists

9.41HE damage / grenade

15.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4095 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.3824% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–11	0.03	28%	29 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.01	10%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	17%	25 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	64%	22 Aug →
inferno	19–22	-0.03	20%	20 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.06	41%	19 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	20%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.12	25%	18 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	21%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.00	15%	18 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	19%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.10	41%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.03	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	15%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.17	16%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.02	24%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.31	21%	16 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.06	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	15%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.11	41%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	19%	14 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.19	38%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.12	23%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	25%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	20%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.05	26%	10 Aug →
inferno	3–13	0.04	18%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.08	30%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.02	22%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	27%	8 Aug →
overpass	13–11	0.09	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	24%	6 Aug →
overpass	13–10	0.06	25%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	39%	4 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.16	35%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	20%	1 Aug →
overpass	13–7	0.00	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	18%	1 Aug →
inferno	7–11	0.08	20%	1 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	32%	29 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.11	18%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.09	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.15	26%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.08	17%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.04	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.21	29%	25 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	24%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.09	30%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.11	31%	21 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.08	25%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.12	20%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	33%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	7 Jul →
cache	2–13	0.04	29%	6 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	23%	5 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	26%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.01	40%	3 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	23%	2 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	17%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.05	18%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.06	19%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.04	18%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	28%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.03	26%	26 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.03	12%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.02	16%	25 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	22%	25 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	22%	25 Jun →
overpass	4–13	0.02	18%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	19%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	17%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.02	19%	20 Jun →
nuke	16–14	0.01	19%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.16	23%	7 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	18%	6 Jun →
overpass	4–13	0.03	18%	29 May →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	15%	29 May →
inferno	12–12	0.01	19%	25 May →
nuke	13–10	0.01	18%	24 May →
mirage	13–4	0.16	20%	24 May →
mirage	13–8	0.01	13%	23 May →
mirage	2–13	0.05	23%	23 May →
inferno	13–4	0.09	28%	23 May →
inferno	13–1	0.27	11%	23 May →
overpass	13–3	0.07	24%	17 May →
mirage	13–4	0.17	27%	17 May →
nuke	6–13	0.01	15%	16 May →
vertigo	2–13	-0.03	20%	16 May →
overpass	12–12	0.12	23%	16 May →
cache	16–14	0.03	21%	14 May →
mirage	13–7	0.08	18%	10 May →
mirage	12–12	0.08	27%	3 May →