Abstruse

Abstruse — CS2 Stats

GB76561198084806733[U:1:124541005]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,268Tracked matches80%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+138Tracked matches · now 2,268
+13.3ppWin rate · 66.7% → 80.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,173 +0 31 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
2,1732,173peak 2,17331 Aug3 Sept
2,173Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-07-18

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAbstruseFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,173csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning65
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT68–29–3Last 10068%Win rateWWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 10–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 17–3 · 85% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time527ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 16 Aug →
64%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 22 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 21 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W11Current streak
15–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 22mirageWeakest map · 50% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3217–1553%0.05
cacheS2219–386%0.03
anubisS1612–475%0.02
nukeS107–370%0.02
mirageB84–450%0.07
dust2S65–183%0.03
ancient—31–233%0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,735Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
75.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12546%1.1115.2
Mirage9752%0.9715.0
Inferno9259%1.0815.1
Ancient8645%1.0114.5
Dust27054%1.0714.9
Cache6962%1.2316.2
Nuke6363%1.1215.8
Vertigo4858%1.0114.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.6%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
530msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
11.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.681% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0126%12 Oct →
dust213–110.0324%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0433%7 Oct →
anubis13–50.0018%5 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0032%5 Oct →
cache13–100.0214%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0724%3 Oct →
nuke13–110.0330%3 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0217%3 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0324%2 Oct →
cache13–50.0317%2 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0422%1 Oct →
cache1–13-0.1114%1 Oct →
inferno19–150.0729%28 Sept →
anubis13–70.0413%27 Sept →
cache10–130.0224%27 Sept →
cache13–40.0420%23 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0120%23 Sept →
nuke13–40.0821%23 Sept →
mirage13–20.0616%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0632%22 Sept →
nuke13–70.0121%22 Sept →
inferno13–40.0822%22 Sept →
dust213–10.0633%21 Sept →
nuke17–190.0321%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0524%20 Sept →
cache13–9-0.035%20 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0112%20 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0329%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0122%18 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0433%18 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0310%17 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0217%16 Sept →
cache13–100.0218%16 Sept →
nuke13–80.0540%15 Sept →
cache12–160.0228%15 Sept →
anubis11–130.0131%14 Sept →
cache13–50.0735%14 Sept →
inferno9–70.1123%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0622%13 Sept →
anubis19–170.0221%4 Sept →
cache13–80.0727%1 Sept →
inferno13–110.0328%29 Aug →
nuke7–9-0.0110%27 Aug →
cache13–100.0017%25 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0464%22 Aug →
inferno19–22-0.0320%20 Aug →
inferno6–130.0641%19 Aug →
ancient9–130.0520%19 Aug →
inferno13–20.1225%18 Aug →
cache13–80.0621%18 Aug →
inferno13–40.0015%18 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0519%17 Aug →
nuke13–10.1041%17 Aug →
anubis13–30.0317%17 Aug →
inferno13–90.0915%16 Aug →
anubis13–20.1716%16 Aug →
anubis13–40.0224%16 Aug →
inferno9–20.3121%16 Aug →
inferno10–130.0620%16 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0221%16 Aug →
dust213–50.0215%15 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0116%15 Aug →
inferno10–130.1141%15 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0519%14 Aug →
cache13–50.1938%14 Aug →
inferno13–110.1223%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0625%11 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0120%10 Aug →
anubis13–30.0526%10 Aug →
inferno3–130.0418%9 Aug →
inferno13–20.0830%9 Aug →
mirage4–130.0222%8 Aug →
dust213–110.0627%8 Aug →
overpass13–110.0924%7 Aug →
mirage11–130.0224%6 Aug →
overpass13–100.0625%6 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0039%4 Aug →
inferno12–120.1635%2 Aug →
dust213–90.0620%1 Aug →
overpass13–70.0029%1 Aug →
mirage4–130.0318%1 Aug →
inferno7–110.0820%1 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0432%29 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.1118%27 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0916%26 Jul →
anubis13–30.1526%26 Jul →
mirage13–90.0918%26 Jul →
mirage12–120.0817%26 Jul →
cache13–110.0118%26 Jul →
cache13–50.0422%25 Jul →
mirage13–40.2129%25 Jul →
cache13–90.0324%25 Jul →
anubis13–70.0930%24 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0317%22 Jul →
inferno13–30.1131%21 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0121%21 Jul →
inferno12–120.0825%19 Jul →
inferno13–40.1220%19 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0133%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.