Liazz

Liazz — CS2 Stats

PROjohn_nobodyTHUNDER dOWNUNDERAustraliaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

AU76561198072321716[U:1:112055988]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,212Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,212 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

36Days played since 2026-02-07

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLiazzFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning55
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT7228Last 10072%Win rateWWWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 433ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility7.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.5
Utility7.7
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time486ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 486ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–9 · train, 20 Apr
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 12 Mar
297msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 16 Mar
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 17 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
W3Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 23ancientWeakest map · 60% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2719870%0.02
nukeS2319483%0.04
anubisS2116576%0.04
dust2S128467%0.02
ancientA106460%0.02
overpass42250%-0.03
mirage21150%0.19
train110100%0.24

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

714Matches
77%Win rate
1.68Avg K/D
84.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
40Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3190%1.5814.2
Nuke2993%1.7315.2
Ancient2588%1.8814.0
Anubis2488%1.7316.3
Mirage2383%1.6514.1
Dust21883%1.7514.4
Vertigo1283%1.6115.6
Overpass667%1.2614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$7,504Inventory value74ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ StatTrak™ Butterfly Knife$1,723★ Karambit | Black Laminate (Well-Worn)$1,138★ Specialist Gloves | Emerald Web (Well-Worn)$884Five-SeveN | Hyper Beast (Minimal Wear)$591SSG 08 | Dragonfire (Factory New)$565M4A1-S | Printstream (Field-Tested)$290

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
483msReaction time
23.6%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
10.60HE damage / grenade
13.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5578% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10.0632%1 Sept
dust213–80.0411%1 Sept
nuke13–50.0717%30 Aug
inferno11–130.0122%30 Aug
anubis13–30.0624%30 Aug
inferno13–80.0027%28 Aug
anubis13–50.1020%28 Aug
anubis13–40.0927%17 Jul
nuke13–0-0.0320%17 Jul
inferno13–50.0022%17 Jul
inferno3–130.0018%4 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0520%4 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0521%3 Jun
dust211–130.0024%2 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0020%2 Jun
nuke10–130.0135%27 May
inferno5–130.0412%16 May
nuke10–13-0.029%16 May
dust213–90.0218%16 May
anubis13–50.0522%14 May
inferno16–120.0417%14 May
ancient13–160.0817%14 May
nuke13–60.1415%13 May
anubis13–50.0114%13 May
dust217–19-0.0218%13 May
inferno13–40.0416%13 May
nuke16–13-0.0318%13 May
dust213–80.0011%12 May
anubis13–7-0.0135%12 May
anubis10–130.0026%11 May
dust210–130.0616%11 May
anubis13–50.0416%3 May
dust213–70.0221%3 May
nuke13–20.0920%1 May
anubis13–5-0.0216%1 May
anubis13–70.0125%29 Apr
inferno13–100.0112%29 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0314%29 Apr
inferno13–80.1428%27 Apr
mirage13–50.2327%27 Apr
anubis10–130.2320%27 Apr
ancient13–50.0416%27 Apr
anubis13–30.1325%27 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0217%21 Apr
train13–90.2424%20 Apr
dust27–130.1317%20 Apr
mirage14–160.1524%20 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0033%17 Mar
ancient13–100.0211%17 Mar
anubis13–90.0515%17 Mar
ancient13–60.0322%17 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0419%17 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0216%17 Mar
inferno7–130.0216%16 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0226%16 Mar
nuke13–110.0322%16 Mar
inferno13–20.0413%16 Mar
ancient16–19-0.0222%15 Mar
anubis13–60.1515%15 Mar
inferno13–7-0.0410%15 Mar
nuke7–60.0617%15 Mar
nuke15–140.0420%15 Mar
anubis16–19-0.0221%15 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0215%15 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0118%14 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0413%14 Mar
anubis13–100.0010%14 Mar
inferno13–50.0220%14 Mar
nuke13–40.0921%12 Mar
dust213–80.0128%12 Mar
inferno8–130.0136%12 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0210%12 Mar
inferno13–30.0221%12 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0513%1 Mar
inferno13–20.0524%1 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0119%28 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0216%28 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0112%27 Feb
dust213–3-0.0119%27 Feb
anubis13–10-0.037%27 Feb
inferno13–90.1313%27 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0114%27 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0414%26 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0124%26 Feb
nuke13–10.0727%26 Feb
anubis13–80.0424%26 Feb
ancient13–5-0.0215%25 Feb
nuke16–120.0621%25 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0218%24 Feb
dust213–8-0.0118%24 Feb
nuke9–130.0314%24 Feb
inferno13–50.0717%22 Feb
nuke13–40.0528%22 Feb
inferno13–40.0333%20 Feb
dust213–10.0317%20 Feb
nuke13–20.1734%18 Feb
ancient13–00.1313%18 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0115%8 Feb
nuke13–100.0612%8 Feb
nuke13–80.0731%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →