Chinosaurus — CS2 Stats

76561198062025677[U:1:101759949]

576Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,280Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning46
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41563Last 10041%Win rateWLLTWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression3.7
Utility3.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.6
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time588ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — inferno 13–9
131Biggest win — overpass
5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 54% over 24dust2Weakest map · 28% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D2571828%-0.04
infernoB24131154%-0.01
mirageC1871139%-0.01
ancientB126650%-0.03
nukeB105550%-0.03
cacheC52340%-0.04
anubis4040%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,349Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,873Matches
43.2%Match win rate
37.6%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
3,170MVPs
785Hours (in match)
2,617Bombs planted
373Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-477,426
AWP2,211
P901,878
SG 5531,445
MAG-71,125
P250844

Lifetime map wins

6,850inferno
2,642dust2
1,857nuke
259vertigo
252train
121cbble
60office
19italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
584msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.85HE damage / grenade
3.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.025 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.07% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–14-0.0815%23 Aug
anubis7–13-0.039%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0419%23 Aug
ancient15–150.0115%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0122%17 Aug
inferno3–130.0215%14 Aug
mirage13–30.055%14 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0613%14 Aug
anubis11–130.0222%8 Aug
dust25–13-0.0412%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0123%8 Aug
mirage10–130.006%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0126%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0716%2 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0324%2 Aug
inferno8–130.0222%25 Jul
ancient13–110.0312%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0520%25 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0911%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0516%18 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0214%28 Jun
dust213–8-0.0221%28 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0414%28 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0111%28 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0011%27 Jun
dust22–13-0.0415%27 Jun
inferno13–5-0.047%27 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0721%27 Jun
nuke6–13-0.038%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0111%6 Jun
inferno10–130.0222%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0411%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.069%31 May
dust23–13-0.0917%31 May
nuke13–11-0.028%31 May
inferno13–11-0.0312%31 May
nuke13–11-0.076%26 May
mirage10–13-0.0522%26 May
dust213–30.0226%26 May
ancient3–13-0.0610%26 May
nuke9–13-0.059%25 May
dust29–13-0.0316%25 May
mirage13–160.0515%25 May
mirage4–13-0.087%25 May
dust25–13-0.0711%25 May
mirage13–100.0020%17 May
dust213–6-0.0214%17 May
inferno11–13-0.0617%17 May
inferno8–13-0.0221%29 Apr
mirage8–130.0010%29 Apr
cache8–13-0.0612%29 Apr
cache5–13-0.0510%29 Apr
cache13–70.0417%29 Apr
cache6–13-0.080%29 Apr
cache13–5-0.0627%28 Apr
nuke5–13-0.068%23 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0310%23 Apr
inferno13–90.0721%23 Apr
inferno3–13-0.090%23 Apr
mirage13–30.0515%23 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0311%22 Apr
ancient13–60.005%20 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0119%20 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0411%20 Apr
mirage1–13-0.1110%20 Apr
inferno12–16-0.0313%19 Apr
dust24–13-0.0711%19 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0024%19 Apr
ancient13–110.0219%18 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0315%18 Apr
dust26–13-0.068%18 Apr
nuke12–16-0.0216%18 Apr
dust24–13-0.0217%18 Apr
ancient13–10-0.067%18 Apr
dust22–13-0.0447%12 Apr
inferno5–130.0025%12 Apr
dust26–130.0215%12 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0312%12 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0217%11 Apr
nuke13–60.0517%11 Apr
anubis6–13-0.054%11 Apr
dust23–13-0.0225%11 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0513%11 Apr
inferno13–40.0219%8 Apr
dust26–2-0.0242%8 Apr
mirage13–40.0019%8 Apr
dust28–13-0.0813%8 Apr
inferno12–120.0314%7 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0320%6 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0517%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0320%6 Apr
inferno13–60.0513%5 Apr
dust25–13-0.0418%5 Apr
dust213–60.0126%5 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0116%5 Apr
overpass13–1-0.119%5 Apr
nuke13–100.016%5 Apr
dust213–9-0.0321%5 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0119%4 Apr
dust27–13-0.0021%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →