Bill Buttlicker — CS2 Stats

AU76561198058567764[U:1:98302036]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,081Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,902Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2407 of 24803 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,363 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning58

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression7.4

Utility5.7

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning5.8

Utility5.7

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time477ms−49ms

first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 6–13

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

W4Current streak

8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 50% over 32

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	32	16–16	50%	0.01
dust2	A	19	11–8	58%	0.02
cache	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.00
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
inferno	S	11	8–3	73%	0.02
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
nuke	A	5	3–2	60%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,494Matches

50%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

78.6ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	324	51%	1.15	15.8
Ancient	237	50%	1.06	16.1
Anubis	174	51%	1.06	16.1
Dust2	129	50%	1.11	15.9
Inferno	122	48%	1.18	16.3
Nuke	72	47%	1.10	15.8
Train	35	60%	1.22	17.9
Overpass	27	48%	1.30	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

42.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

50.0%Spray accuracy

86.2%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

475msReaction time

35.4%T opening success

51.9%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

8.6%Flash assists

7.37HE damage / grenade

9.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.3549% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	0.04	33%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.06	16%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	10%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	18%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.03	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.01	23%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.06	21%	24 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.03	24%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.06	36%	22 Aug →
ancient	22–18	-0.00	28%	22 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.00	21%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	18%	21 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.08	16%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	17%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.01	36%	21 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	13%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	24%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	32%	20 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.02	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	16%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	29%	19 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	10%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	24%	19 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.06	22%	19 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	15%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	26%	19 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	29%	18 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.07	9%	17 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.01	14%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	26%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.08	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.03	20%	14 Aug →
cache	12–1	0.04	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	22%	13 Aug →
nuke	19–22	0.06	16%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.11	22%	12 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	8%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	22%	12 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	23%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.05	20%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	17–19	-0.03	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.03	24%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.04	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.06	23%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	18%	8 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.00	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	14%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	32%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	11%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.06	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	17%	7 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.05	34%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	16%	6 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.03	21%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.02	17%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	26%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.04	27%	6 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	22%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	19%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.04	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	19–17	-0.03	15%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	29%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.03	25%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	19%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.04	12%	1 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	25%	1 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	16%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	20%	1 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.00	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	22%	29 Jul →
anubis	2–9	0.04	21%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	21%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	27%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	26%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	15–19	-0.06	23%	28 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	23%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.08	13%	27 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.02	26%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	22%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	20%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.18	26%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.02	26%	23 Jul →