hieudini-

hieudini- — CS2 Stats

US76561198058337010[U:1:98071282]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,151Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,285Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88630 of 239471 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+169Premier CS Rating · 19,116 → 19,285
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,285 +1,913 27 Jul23 Sept · 26 days played
17,37220,747peak 20,74727 Jul23 Sept
20,747Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,462 below peak (20,747)
  • -790 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 715 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhieudini-FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,285 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateWLWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time540ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−8.7%
first ⅓ avg 29.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 4 Aug
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · inferno, 20 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 20 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC23101343%-0.00
mirageC2191243%-0.02
infernoB20101050%-0.01
dust2B126650%-0.01
anubisS107370%0.03
cacheS75271%-0.02
nukeA74357%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

333Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
71.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6146%0.8513.7
Ancient5459%0.9714.4
Dust24137%1.0114.9
Inferno4149%0.9113.2
Anubis3951%1.0716.6
Nuke2658%0.9214.1
Cache1553%1.0315.1
Vertigo944%0.6711.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
541msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
7.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.9558% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0518%23 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0819%23 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0920%23 Sept
cache7–13-0.0617%22 Sept
inferno5–20.0818%22 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0210%16 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0224%16 Sept
anubis16–120.0616%16 Sept
cache11–13-0.0326%14 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0333%14 Sept
inferno9–130.0130%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0234%11 Sept
ancient10–130.0126%11 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0722%10 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0220%10 Sept
anubis9–130.0926%9 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0123%6 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0039%5 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0818%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0412%4 Sept
nuke16–140.0623%4 Sept
ancient13–110.0324%3 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0516%2 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0125%2 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0617%2 Sept
ancient13–60.0230%1 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0528%1 Sept
cache16–13-0.0223%1 Sept
ancient13–160.0126%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.076%31 Aug
dust29–130.048%30 Aug
cache13–5-0.0116%30 Aug
mirage7–13-0.076%30 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0338%30 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0326%29 Aug
inferno13–90.0118%29 Aug
anubis13–60.0331%29 Aug
inferno13–90.0519%28 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0520%28 Aug
cache13–10-0.0729%27 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0326%27 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0119%26 Aug
dust213–80.0721%26 Aug
inferno0–13-0.1121%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0432%25 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0531%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0726%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0226%23 Aug
cache13–90.0341%23 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0321%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0228%21 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0231%21 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0520%20 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0722%20 Aug
inferno13–00.0053%20 Aug
cache13–70.0452%20 Aug
mirage16–120.0133%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0422%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.0712%18 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0621%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0438%17 Aug
mirage13–50.0423%17 Aug
mirage16–130.0218%15 Aug
dust214–16-0.0325%13 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0226%12 Aug
inferno7–130.0112%12 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0134%12 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0329%11 Aug
inferno5–13-0.1118%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0241%11 Aug
anubis13–20.1134%9 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0735%9 Aug
dust27–130.0133%9 Aug
ancient16–140.0227%8 Aug
ancient8–130.0526%8 Aug
inferno13–40.0550%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0243%8 Aug
dust213–8-0.0644%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0233%7 Aug
nuke16–130.1023%6 Aug
dust213–110.0232%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0333%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0415%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0320%5 Aug
anubis13–80.1018%4 Aug
ancient13–60.1638%4 Aug
dust211–13-0.0138%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.079%2 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0529%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0123%1 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0122%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0139%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0124%30 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0323%30 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0930%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0720%28 Jul
ancient13–40.1030%28 Jul
inferno13–110.1031%28 Jul
dust213–00.0245%28 Jul
dust216–12-0.0234%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →