No Alibis? — CS2 Stats

76561198056643631[U:1:96377903]✓ No bans

169Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,030Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	33.0%	41.2%	42.2%	9.1% short
Shot accuracy	16.9%	12.5%	11.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.04	0.96	0.98	above
Match win rate	44.9%	42.8%	43.6%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning46

Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–36–4Last 8855%Win rateLLLLLTWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression7.7

Utility1.3

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning4.6

Utility1.3

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time649ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms

Headshot accuracy20.3%+4.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 88 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — overpass 9–1

16–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L5Current streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.02
inferno	A	15	9–6	60%	-0.01
ancient	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
vertigo	A	8	5–3	63%	0.02
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
train	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
grail	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 88 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,305Lifetime kills

1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players

2,657Matches

44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players

33.0%Headshot %

16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players

6,654MVPs

1,030Hours (in match)

2,467Bombs planted

731Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,047

AWP6,322

M4A4 / M4A1-S5,223

Desert Eagle2,367

P2000 / USP-S2,242

Negev2,213

Glock-181,763

Galil AR1,200

P2501,134

Nova1,027

Lifetime map wins

3,859dust2

3,767inferno

1,443nuke

938train

916cbble

445vertigo

381office

136italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

80.2%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

641msReaction time

34.3%T opening success

49.5%CT opening success

0.22Enemies flashed / flash

0.8%Flash assists

10.15HE damage / grenade

0.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2225 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.2573% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	2–13	0.08	25%	5 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.02	10%	4 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	9%	19 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	13%	18 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	25%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.05	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	14%	15 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.03	12%	14 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	29%	14 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	12%	13 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	24%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.07	15%	12 Jul →
office	13–8	0.07	22%	11 Jul →
train	0–13	-0.04	14%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	7%	5 Jul →
vertigo	6–0	0.06	20%	5 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.01	13%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	13%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	13%	2 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.00	9%	1 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	16%	29 Jun →
anubis	4–2	-0.02	100%	29 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.03	27%	29 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.01	24%	28 Jun →
warden	13–7	-0.02	14%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	25%	28 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	28%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.00	17%	27 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.01	31%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	14%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	9%	20 Jun →
dust2	5–12	0.02	22%	20 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	24%	20 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.02	9%	20 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.03	15%	20 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	23%	18 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.06	24%	7 Jun →
anubis	13–2	0.02	26%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	21%	25 Dec →
overpass	13–6	-0.00	10%	25 Dec →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	15%	25 Dec →
grail	5–5	-0.05	33%	31 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	22%	31 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	6%	12 Mar →
ancient	13–2	0.04	26%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	9%	21 Feb →
train	5–13	0.03	7%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–10	0.05	17%	5 Sept →
vertigo	4–0	0.14	14%	5 Sept →
office	12–12	0.06	11%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	15%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–1	-0.03	15%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	4%	2 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	20%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	16%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	22%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	15%	25 Nov →
nuke	3–9	-0.06	40%	25 Nov →
overpass	9–1	0.14	9%	25 Nov →
dust2	13–4	-0.05	16%	12 Nov →
mirage	12–16	-0.10	15%	12 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.03	31%	11 Nov →
ancient	13–8	0.01	14%	11 Nov →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	27%	11 Nov →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	5%	11 Nov →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	17%	28 Sept →
vertigo	16–12	-0.04	16%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	6%	28 Sept →
overpass	9–4	0.00	18%	3 Apr →
inferno	9–5	0.00	13%	3 Apr →
mirage	5–9	-0.01	19%	10 Mar →
vertigo	7–9	-0.03	26%	19 Dec →
overpass	6–16	-0.10	8%	24 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.00	16%	18 Aug →
train	16–11	0.00	18%	12 Jul →
nuke	16–11	0.00	14%	29 May →
inferno	16–8	0.00	24%	8 Feb →
mirage	16–1	0.00	20%	4 Jan →
inferno	7–16	0.00	8%	2 Jan →
train	16–9	0.00	12%	2 Jan →
vertigo	22–20	0.00	11%	2 Jan →
mirage	9–16	0.00	9%	29 Dec →
inferno	16–7	0.00	14%	29 Dec →
mirage	20–22	0.00	8%	17 Dec →

Show all 88 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price