Caderler — CS2 Stats
FI76561198048370058[U:1:88104330]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- 1,693 below peak (27,235)
- -1,693 over 30 days · declining
- Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,458 to go
- Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction
Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 20%
- Avg reaction 603ms
Last 10
- 4–6 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating 0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 19%
- Avg reaction 579ms
Last 20
- 8–12 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating -0.01
- Avg headshot accuracy 17%
- Avg reaction 575ms
Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).
Effective flashes
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.
Areas to improve
CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.
Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 cache | A | 31 | 17–14 | 55% | 0.00 |
 ancient | B | 21 | 11–10 | 52% | 0.00 |
 anubis | A | 16 | 9–7 | 56% | -0.01 |
 nuke | S | 15 | 10–5 | 67% | 0.02 |
 mirage | C | 11 | 4–7 | 36% | -0.02 |
 inferno | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | 0.01 |
 dust2 | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
 overpass | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.02 |
 vertigo | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 20 | 70% | 1.45 | 14.2 |
| Cache | 18 | 72% | 1.55 | 14.9 |
| Ancient | 17 | 71% | 1.24 | 17.1 |
| Nuke | 16 | 81% | 1.48 | 17.1 |
| Anubis | 14 | 64% | 1.16 | 15.1 |
| Inferno | 11 | 45% | 1.22 | 19.1 |
| Dust2 | 7 | 71% | 1.49 | 16.7 |
| Vertigo | 4 | 50% | 1.60 | 15.8 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 38.3837% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dust2 | 13–7 | 0.02 | 16% | 12 Oct → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.12 | 20% | 11 Oct → | |
| nuke | 10–13 | 0.11 | 22% | 11 Oct → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | 0.02 | 27% | 9 Oct → | |
| nuke | 7–10 | -0.07 | 16% | 9 Oct → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.01 | 12% | 9 Oct → | |
| nuke | 9–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 6 Oct → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.03 | 28% | 6 Oct → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.03 | 14% | 6 Oct → | |
| overpass | 13–6 | 0.02 | 11% | 5 Oct → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 3 Oct → | |
| ancient | 6–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 3 Oct → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | -0.06 | 13% | 2 Oct → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.09 | 17% | 2 Oct → | |
| mirage | 2–6 | -0.10 | 13% | 2 Oct → | |
| ancient | 13–11 | -0.04 | 12% | 2 Oct → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.01 | 27% | 2 Oct → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.00 | 10% | 2 Oct → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.02 | 18% | 2 Oct → | |
| cache | 8–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 1 Oct → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | 0.09 | 28% | 1 Oct → | |
| cache | 13–9 | 0.01 | 31% | 1 Oct → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | 0.12 | 13% | 30 Sept → | |
| cache | 11–13 | 0.07 | 16% | 30 Sept → | |
| anubis | 12–12 | 0.01 | 18% | 29 Sept → | |
| cache | 11–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 29 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.05 | 19% | 29 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.08 | 16% | 28 Sept → | |
| cache | 12–12 | 0.02 | 20% | 28 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.00 | 25% | 27 Sept → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.05 | 12% | 27 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.06 | 21% | 24 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–2 | 0.04 | 11% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–8 | 0.01 | 21% | 24 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | -0.00 | 20% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 5–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 24 Sept → | |
| cache | 1–7 | -0.11 | 67% | 23 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–1 | 0.01 | 21% | 20 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.07 | 8% | 20 Sept → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.03 | 19% | 19 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | 0.04 | 19% | 19 Sept → | |
| cache | 9–13 | -0.02 | 14% | 19 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.03 | 23% | 18 Sept → | |
| cache | 8–7 | 0.07 | 23% | 17 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–5 | 0.04 | 19% | 16 Sept → | |
| anubis | 8–1 | 0.01 | 50% | 16 Sept → | |
| ancient | 10–13 | 0.02 | 19% | 16 Sept → | |
| mirage | 16–14 | -0.02 | 25% | 16 Sept → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.03 | 36% | 13 Sept → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | 0.05 | 25% | 13 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–0 | 0.04 | 17% | 13 Sept → | |
| ancient | 0–13 | -0.12 | 29% | 11 Sept → | |
| anubis | 12–1 | 0.11 | 11% | 11 Sept → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 11 Sept → | |
| cache | 10–13 | 0.02 | 17% | 9 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | -0.01 | 11% | 6 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–4 | 0.02 | 27% | 5 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–6 | -0.01 | 18% | 5 Sept → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | 0.00 | 13% | 5 Sept → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.06 | 7% | 5 Sept → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.03 | 15% | 5 Sept → | |
| cache | 8–0 | 0.06 | 17% | 5 Sept → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | -0.02 | 13% | 30 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.03 | 16% | 30 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | -0.05 | 15% | 30 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.05 | 11% | 29 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.02 | 13% | 29 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | -0.00 | 18% | 28 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.02 | 13% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.04 | 6% | 25 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | 0.04 | 14% | 23 Aug → | |
| inferno | 1–5 | -0.03 | 38% | 23 Aug → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 22 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–11 | -0.01 | 11% | 22 Aug → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 22 Aug → | |
| ancient | 16–14 | 0.05 | 13% | 21 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–10 | -0.00 | 9% | 20 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–5 | 0.02 | 20% | 20 Aug → | |
| ancient | 4–3 | 0.02 | 50% | 20 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–2 | -0.05 | 9% | 20 Aug → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | 0.06 | 14% | 20 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–11 | -0.02 | 21% | 18 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–9 | 0.05 | 13% | 18 Aug → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | -0.03 | 7% | 18 Aug → | |
| cache | 9–13 | 0.09 | 17% | 17 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | 0.07 | 17% | 16 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | -0.06 | 9% | 15 Aug → | |
| inferno | 13–8 | 0.07 | 17% | 14 Aug → | |
| anubis | 0–2 | -0.09 | 100% | 14 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–3 | -0.01 | 23% | 12 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | 0.05 | 14% | 12 Aug → | |
| anubis | 0–2 | -0.12 | 0% | 12 Aug → | |
| anubis | 8–13 | -0.04 | 9% | 11 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.05 | 14% | 9 Aug → | |
| anubis | 4–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 9 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.01 | 9% | 8 Aug → | |
| cache | 13–7 | 0.06 | 13% | 8 Aug → | |
| vertigo | 13–2 | 0.04 | 10% | 7 Aug → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.07 | 0% | 6 Aug → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.00 | 12% | 6 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.
Recent teammates
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.