Garƒield

Garƒield — CS2 Stats

CI76561198046897756[U:1:86632028]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,069Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,806Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,069 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,806 +887 26 Apr – 12 Nov · 33 days played
15,00018,139peak 18,13926 Apr12 Nov
18,139Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-04-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 333 below peak (18,139)
  • -100 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,194 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGarƒieldPREMIER17,806 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning55
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.7

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.5
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time558ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 24 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · cache, 7 May →
313msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · cache, 7 May →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 24 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 19mirageWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2212–1055%-0.00
cacheB2110–1148%0.02
infernoA1911–858%0.00
anubisB126–650%0.01
mirageD122–1017%0.00
overpassC52–340%-0.01
nuke—43–175%0.03
dust2—41–325%-0.01
rush_001—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
566msReaction time
30.1%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.78HE damage / grenade
14.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–130.0316%31 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0618%29 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0312%14 Oct →
nuke13–110.1412%6 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0821%30 Sept →
rush_0018–60.0423%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.0116%23 Sept →
anubis13–100.0613%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0610%29 Aug →
ancient13–110.019%15 Aug →
cache13–90.0514%9 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.1013%8 Aug →
ancient13–110.0510%8 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.075%8 Aug →
cache16–130.0119%7 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0133%7 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0114%1 Aug →
ancient13–80.0412%27 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0419%26 Jul →
cache13–160.0117%26 Jul →
inferno13–110.0613%24 Jul →
mirage8–130.0128%24 Jul →
cache13–10.1416%24 Jul →
cache10–130.0022%21 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0020%20 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0613%15 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.0310%15 Jun →
inferno13–60.0424%13 Jun →
overpass5–13-0.0021%6 Jun →
ancient13–80.007%1 Jun →
mirage9–130.0219%1 Jun →
mirage10–130.0416%31 May →
anubis6–13-0.018%31 May →
ancient13–50.0313%31 May →
ancient2–13-0.0711%31 May →
overpass13–9-0.008%30 May →
mirage9–130.0311%30 May →
anubis13–9-0.049%30 May →
nuke9–13-0.0218%30 May →
mirage14–160.0115%25 May →
overpass10–130.0213%25 May →
anubis5–130.035%24 May →
anubis11–130.0214%24 May →
nuke13–50.0310%24 May →
dust29–13-0.0413%24 May →
ancient13–30.0714%23 May →
mirage11–130.049%23 May →
nuke13–4-0.0319%23 May →
anubis11–130.0510%23 May →
inferno2–13-0.0217%23 May →
inferno8–13-0.0410%23 May →
ancient12–120.0312%23 May →
inferno13–100.0916%17 May →
ancient9–13-0.0211%17 May →
inferno13–110.0120%17 May →
anubis13–100.0330%17 May →
ancient13–7-0.0211%17 May →
mirage13–70.0214%16 May →
overpass11–13-0.0310%14 May →
anubis10–130.0614%14 May →
anubis13–30.0313%14 May →
anubis13–100.009%14 May →
ancient8–13-0.0425%12 May →
inferno13–80.0428%12 May →
ancient14–16-0.048%11 May →
ancient9–130.0111%11 May →
mirage2–13-0.0314%11 May →
ancient13–10-0.0422%11 May →
inferno13–50.0715%11 May →
dust211–130.0210%10 May →
cache13–30.0316%10 May →
cache12–120.0215%10 May →
mirage13–90.036%9 May →
inferno13–11-0.0412%9 May →
cache13–50.0215%9 May →
inferno9–13-0.0420%8 May →
mirage7–13-0.0311%7 May →
cache3–130.0227%7 May →
mirage12–12-0.0318%7 May →
inferno13–110.0012%7 May →
cache2–00.0750%7 May →
ancient13–80.0113%7 May →
cache7–130.0312%7 May →
cache13–20.0517%5 May →
dust210–13-0.0311%4 May →
cache13–70.0931%4 May →
cache4–13-0.0312%3 May →
cache11–13-0.0215%3 May →
inferno13–5-0.0715%3 May →
cache13–20.1019%3 May →
cache11–13-0.0221%30 Apr →
cache13–30.005%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0417%29 Apr →
ancient8–130.0520%27 Apr →
inferno14–160.0511%26 Apr →
ancient3–130.046%26 Apr →
dust213–70.0335%26 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0318%25 Apr →
anubis3–4-0.0125%25 Apr →
inferno8–80.0022%23 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.