b90 — CS2 Stats

US76561198037826370[U:1:77560642]Steam profile ↗

1,858Tracked matches82%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,225Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning49

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY71–23–6Last 10071%Win rateWWWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.7

Aggression5.8

Utility6.9

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.9

Utility6.9

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time578ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–0

13–0Biggest win — anubis

13Longest win streak

W4Current streak

8–1In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 35infernoWeakest map · 62% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	35	29–6	83%	0.01
cache	S	20	13–7	65%	-0.01
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.02
mirage	S	10	8–2	80%	0.01
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.00
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (62% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

275,023Lifetime kills

1.64K/D · Top 5% of tracked players

15,258Matches

69.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players

51.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players

12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players

21,384MVPs

3,663Hours (in match)

8,080Bombs planted

2,648Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47105,344

M4A4 / M4A1-S45,981

AWP32,134

P2000 / USP-S12,782

Desert Eagle9,930

Glock-187,603

SSG 085,067

P2504,952

Negev4,388

Tec-94,229

Lifetime map wins

29,924dust2

6,734inferno

4,208nuke

3,227vertigo

1,597train

987cbble

427office

257lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

189Matches

59%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

67.2ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	9	67%	0.89	13.4
Dust2	3	67%	1.25	17.3
Vertigo	2	50%	1.04	15.0
Inferno	1	0%	1.19	19.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.36	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy

32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

587msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

45.8%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

10.5%Flash assists

8.45HE damage / grenade

12.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.9066% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–10	0.03	23%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.08	20%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–0	0.14	35%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	18%	12 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	9%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.04	19%	25 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	8%	9 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	10%	9 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.02	21%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–0	-0.03	17%	9 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.00	17%	9 Jun →
cache	3–0	0.00	0%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	8%	9 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.02	31%	9 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.03	18%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	15%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	14%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.04	15%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	26%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.08	29%	24 May →
inferno	8–13	0.02	15%	21 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	17%	21 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	20%	10 May →
cache	13–11	-0.01	19%	7 May →
dust2	13–1	0.07	25%	7 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	20%	7 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	13%	7 May →
cache	9–13	-0.01	11%	7 May →
dust2	13–6	0.02	23%	7 May →
cache	13–7	-0.01	26%	29 Apr →
cache	8–13	0.01	22%	29 Apr →
cache	13–11	0.06	14%	29 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.01	21%	29 Apr →
cache	13–8	-0.07	14%	29 Apr →
cache	8–13	-0.08	21%	29 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.06	14%	29 Apr →
cache	13–5	0.02	12%	29 Apr →
cache	13–10	-0.05	22%	29 Apr →
cache	10–13	-0.05	13%	29 Apr →
cache	2–13	-0.05	9%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.06	11%	28 Apr →
dust2	10–5	0.06	31%	28 Apr →
dust2	8–13	0.00	30%	29 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	10%	23 Mar →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	22%	21 Mar →
sanctum	6–9	0.02	18%	13 Mar →
poseidon	9–6	0.00	25%	13 Mar →
mirage	13–2	0.12	15%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.07	22%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–5	0.05	31%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	14%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.03	11%	13 Mar →
office	13–8	0.03	16%	9 Mar →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	11%	9 Mar →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	23%	9 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	16%	9 Mar →
mirage	7–0	0.03	25%	9 Mar →
nuke	15–15	-0.04	12%	5 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.02	14%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–2	0.09	18%	5 Mar →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	20%	5 Mar →
nuke	4–13	0.11	11%	5 Mar →
mirage	12–12	0.04	20%	3 Mar →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	15%	3 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	25%	29 Jan →
dust2	13–3	0.04	20%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	26%	29 Jan →
inferno	13–1	-0.04	0%	29 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.04	29%	23 Jan →
dust2	13–2	0.07	15%	23 Jan →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	18%	23 Jan →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	8%	23 Jan →
dust2	13–1	0.08	26%	23 Jan →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	24%	21 Jan →
dust2	13–3	-0.07	20%	21 Jan →
nuke	13–5	0.05	16%	21 Jan →
mirage	13–2	0.00	17%	21 Jan →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	20%	17 Jan →
inferno	8–13	-0.08	6%	17 Jan →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	14%	17 Jan →
dust2	13–3	0.01	21%	14 Jan →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	10%	1 Jan →
overpass	13–2	0.02	27%	1 Jan →
dust2	13–6	0.06	22%	1 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	20%	30 Dec →
dust2	12–12	0.02	21%	30 Dec →
dust2	13–2	0.10	16%	29 Dec →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	15%	29 Dec →
dust2	13–2	0.01	25%	29 Dec →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	31%	27 Dec →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	11%	27 Dec →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	14%	27 Dec →
dust2	13–2	0.03	15%	27 Dec →
ancient	4–13	0.02	13%	27 Dec →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	9%	25 Dec →
vertigo	13–4	0.07	19%	17 Dec →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	12%	16 Dec →
ancient	4–13	-0.09	17%	16 Dec →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	16%	15 Dec →