LOLWaterchicken!

LOLWaterchicken! — CS2 Stats

76561198037617790[U:1:77352062]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,523Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,137 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,137 → 2,137
+15Tracked matches · now 2,523
+3.3ppWin rate · 56.7% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,137 +0 1 Sept4 Sept · 2 observations
2,1372,137peak 2,1371 Sept4 Sept
2,137Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-05-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,137
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 363 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLOLWaterchicken!FACEITLevel 10 · 2,137 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,137csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning66
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWWLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.3
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time507ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 507ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 15 Aug
38%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 6 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · anubis, 15 Aug
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1111In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 41% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27111641%0.00
infernoC2191243%-0.02
ancientA2012860%0.00
anubisB136746%0.02
cacheS139469%0.00
nuke32167%-0.03
overpass31233%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,220Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
81.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust227351%1.0415.8
Inferno25557%1.1316.3
Ancient18851%1.0316.0
Anubis10849%1.0616.7
Overpass10652%1.0415.0
Nuke4040%0.9315.0
Cache3560%1.1818.3
Train2548%1.0818.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
501msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
58.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
8.38HE damage / grenade
14.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8411% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–140.0119%20 Sept
anubis13–110.1123%10 Sept
dust26–130.0520%10 Sept
ancient13–110.0516%10 Sept
anubis13–60.0510%10 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0725%8 Sept
dust23–130.0138%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0013%4 Sept
cache13–11-0.0120%4 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0524%4 Sept
cache13–50.0513%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.0429%4 Sept
nuke16–130.0132%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0620%30 Aug
inferno6–13-0.069%30 Aug
dust213–60.0211%30 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0710%30 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0115%20 Aug
cache16–14-0.0011%16 Aug
dust213–60.0618%16 Aug
dust216–140.0222%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.045%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0712%15 Aug
ancient11–130.019%15 Aug
ancient13–70.1221%15 Aug
ancient16–130.0311%15 Aug
ancient13–30.027%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0411%15 Aug
inferno11–130.0431%15 Aug
anubis13–160.0115%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0225%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.073%14 Aug
inferno13–70.0324%14 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0116%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0310%14 Aug
dust213–70.0113%14 Aug
cache25–23-0.019%9 Aug
anubis9–13-0.027%9 Aug
anubis16–120.0220%7 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%1 Aug
cache14–160.0116%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0320%30 Jul
inferno19–160.0029%28 Jul
cache6–13-0.0333%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0212%28 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0211%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0329%28 Jul
ancient13–10-0.038%26 Jul
cache13–70.0819%26 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0033%26 Jul
dust210–130.0316%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0420%24 Jul
anubis5–130.0313%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.0233%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0124%20 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0324%19 Jul
dust28–13-0.0510%19 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0818%17 Jul
dust213–80.0620%16 Jul
dust214–16-0.0316%14 Jul
cache22–20-0.0018%5 Jul
dust211–130.0031%4 Jul
cache13–3-0.0123%4 Jul
dust215–190.0220%4 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0421%2 Jul
inferno4–130.0111%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.049%1 Jul
inferno0–9-0.2517%1 Jul
anubis13–160.0414%28 Jun
inferno13–60.1125%28 Jun
dust214–16-0.0412%28 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0132%28 Jun
dust213–6-0.0123%28 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0612%13 Jun
inferno13–100.0528%13 Jun
anubis19–170.0716%12 Jun
dust213–7-0.0014%12 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0111%7 Jun
anubis13–40.017%5 Jun
ancient16–130.0217%2 Jun
ancient2–130.0320%31 May
ancient13–5-0.0514%31 May
dust211–13-0.0137%31 May
cache16–14-0.0320%31 May
inferno11–13-0.059%19 May
overpass11–130.0116%19 May
ancient11–13-0.0727%17 May
dust27–130.0319%17 May
dust213–50.0521%17 May
cache13–60.0814%17 May
inferno10–13-0.1012%16 May
inferno19–150.0416%15 May
overpass13–10-0.0224%15 May
inferno13–100.0412%14 May
dust216–130.0013%14 May
inferno7–13-0.035%14 May
dust213–50.0620%14 May
ancient11–13-0.0016%14 May
ancient8–13-0.0222%14 May
cache9–13-0.0523%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →