Hatz — CS2 Stats

PROFree AgentAustraliaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198024927786[U:1:64662058]

1,672Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating29,331Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#144 of 17764 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,649 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHatzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,649 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER29,331 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning69
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57394Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.2
Aggression10.0
Utility5.9
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning6.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time578ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — cache 13–7
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 41% over 32
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32131941%0.03
ancientA2011955%0.03
dust2S1510567%0.05
infernoA95456%0.03
anubisA74357%0.10
cacheS76186%0.13
nukeS65183%0.09
overpass43175%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,856Matches
63%Win rate
1.57Avg K/D
89.8ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15255%1.4618.9
Anubis6962%1.4618.4
Dust26645%1.4019.0
Ancient4959%1.6020.9
Nuke2378%2.0717.8
Inferno2070%1.4718.4
Vertigo1953%1.4917.1
Overpass1070%1.2618.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$544Inventory value249ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Survival Knife | Marble Fade (Factory New)$174MP9 | Sand Scale (Factory New)$14MP9 | Sand Scale (Factory New)$14MP9 | Sand Scale (Factory New)$14MP9 | Sand Scale (Factory New)$14CZ75-Auto | Polymer (Factory New)$11

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
577msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
64.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
7.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.984% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0140%6 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0120%6 Jul
nuke13–60.2027%3 Jul
mirage13–30.1524%3 Jul
anubis13–50.0427%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0421%23 Jun
dust213–20.0524%9 Jun
mirage13–20.0150%13 May
ancient11–130.0316%13 May
cache13–50.1134%12 May
mirage13–30.1215%12 May
dust29–13-0.0140%7 May
mirage13–60.0422%7 May
cache13–90.1125%4 May
cache12–120.1025%1 May
cache13–40.1040%1 May
cache13–20.1235%1 May
cache13–70.2329%1 May
cache13–40.1531%1 May
ancient1–13-0.0813%16 Apr
dust213–40.1625%13 Apr
mirage17–19-0.0429%11 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0222%11 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0326%11 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0629%10 Apr
anubis9–130.0731%10 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0022%10 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0231%8 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0317%2 Apr
mirage9–130.0429%2 Apr
mirage11–130.0116%2 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0423%31 Mar
overpass8–130.0523%31 Mar
overpass13–110.0519%31 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0339%29 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0224%29 Mar
anubis8–130.0424%29 Mar
mirage9–130.0227%29 Mar
ancient13–60.0933%29 Mar
dust213–90.1032%28 Mar
mirage9–130.0419%27 Mar
mirage13–3-0.0019%27 Mar
ancient19–160.0524%26 Mar
dust213–90.0337%26 Mar
ancient10–130.0319%25 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0113%25 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0132%23 Mar
dust213–20.0228%22 Mar
inferno16–120.0534%29 Jan
anubis13–50.1437%29 Jan
mirage6–130.0533%28 Jan
ancient13–40.0836%28 Jan
anubis13–60.1526%28 Jan
dust210–130.0529%28 Jan
inferno13–100.0216%28 Jan
ancient13–10.1828%28 Jan
inferno13–110.0624%28 Jan
nuke13–70.0631%27 Jan
dust23–13-0.0233%24 Jan
ancient13–100.0320%24 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0129%24 Jan
mirage4–130.0632%24 Jan
inferno15–150.0520%24 Jan
mirage13–60.1529%24 Jan
nuke13–50.1029%24 Jan
dust213–40.0626%24 Jan
mirage9–130.0031%22 Jan
dust213–70.1232%22 Jan
anubis15–150.1027%22 Jan
anubis13–70.1627%22 Jan
mirage13–50.0429%22 Jan
ancient13–80.0223%22 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0532%21 Jan
mirage13–100.1129%19 Jan
dust213–20.0348%19 Jan
ancient13–90.0226%19 Jan
dust213–50.0931%19 Jan
nuke7–130.0535%17 Jan
mirage6–130.1025%17 Jan
inferno13–60.0832%17 Jan
dust216–140.0528%17 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0127%17 Jan
overpass13–70.0524%17 Jan
mirage13–10.0711%17 Jan
ancient13–80.0427%17 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0132%17 Jan
inferno13–60.0229%17 Jan
nuke13–80.0528%14 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0233%14 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0128%14 Jan
ancient6–130.0328%14 Jan
ancient16–140.0224%14 Jan
mirage13–90.0735%13 Jan
ancient15–150.0424%13 Jan
ancient11–130.0126%13 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0124%13 Jan
overpass13–50.0121%13 Jan
nuke13–20.0931%12 Jan
dust26–130.0330%12 Jan
inferno9–130.0425%9 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →