twfisher

twfisher — CS2 Stats

US76561198017710596[U:1:57444868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,144Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating30,232Top 1% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#485 of 260035 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,312 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 30,232 +2,185 28 Aug – 3 Nov · 17 days played
28,04730,238peak 30,23828 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,312 +0 28 Aug – 26 Oct · 6 observations
2,3122,312peak 2,31228 Aug26 Oct
30,335Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,312Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,312
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 188 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 6 below peak (30,238)
  • +798 over 30 days · improving
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Gold band first seen 2026-10-26
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtwfisherFACEITLevel 10 · 2,312 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER30,232 · Gold bandPEAK ELO2,312csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning62
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateLWTWWTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.7
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.2
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time512ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 8 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 14 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 4 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 15mirageWeakest map · 39% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%0.01
infernoC219–1243%0.03
dust2S1512–380%0.02
cacheS1512–380%0.02
ancientB137–654%0.01
anubisB84–450%0.03
nuke—42–250%0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,029Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
76.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30952%1.1614.9
Anubis13258%1.1515.8
Ancient10852%1.1215.6
Inferno10458%1.1715.7
Dust29353%1.0214.6
Vertigo6256%1.2315.4
Overpass5349%1.1215.6
Nuke4858%1.1014.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
510msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
12.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1567% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–130.0111%4 Nov →
vertigo13–110.0126%4 Nov →
anubis12–120.0519%4 Nov →
ancient13–100.0113%3 Nov →
dust213–70.0135%3 Nov →
anubis12–120.1026%1 Nov →
mirage3–130.0121%1 Nov →
anubis4–130.0315%1 Nov →
mirage13–70.0417%1 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0117%1 Nov →
mirage2–4-0.0125%28 Oct →
ancient13–90.0327%28 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0714%27 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0217%27 Oct →
inferno12–120.0211%27 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.054%26 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0133%26 Oct →
mirage13–60.0613%25 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0120%25 Oct →
dust213–30.1027%25 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0127%25 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0020%25 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0022%25 Oct →
dust213–60.1231%25 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0126%25 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0529%22 Oct →
dust213–30.0423%22 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0520%22 Oct →
inferno7–130.0219%22 Oct →
cache13–30.1119%22 Oct →
cache13–40.0720%22 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%21 Oct →
cache13–110.0219%21 Oct →
mirage13–90.0326%21 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0124%21 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0139%20 Oct →
ancient13–100.0322%20 Oct →
nuke13–60.0339%20 Oct →
anubis7–3-0.0332%20 Oct →
ancient13–50.0918%19 Oct →
dust213–80.0027%19 Oct →
cache13–70.0315%19 Oct →
dust213–10.0218%19 Oct →
ancient10–130.0125%19 Oct →
cache13–70.0118%18 Oct →
ancient16–130.0223%17 Oct →
mirage13–100.0112%16 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0225%16 Oct →
cache13–30.0538%16 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0014%16 Oct →
anubis13–100.0418%16 Oct →
cache13–110.0027%16 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0119%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0719%15 Oct →
dust213–90.0532%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0025%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0522%15 Oct →
ancient8–130.0240%14 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0529%14 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0020%14 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0624%13 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0323%13 Oct →
mirage8–130.0120%13 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0528%12 Oct →
cache13–60.0314%11 Oct →
dust213–100.0020%11 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0338%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.1040%10 Oct →
inferno8–130.0215%10 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0415%10 Oct →
nuke4–130.0315%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0322%10 Oct →
mirage10–130.0619%10 Oct →
inferno13–110.0316%10 Oct →
inferno13–20.0519%10 Oct →
inferno11–130.0823%10 Oct →
ancient16–19-0.0220%9 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0229%9 Oct →
mirage10–130.0122%9 Oct →
mirage6–130.0838%9 Oct →
inferno13–50.1218%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.0519%8 Oct →
dust213–70.0216%7 Oct →
cache13–60.0528%7 Oct →
inferno5–130.0019%7 Oct →
cache13–40.0222%6 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0121%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0125%5 Oct →
inferno13–50.0818%5 Oct →
inferno11–130.0429%5 Oct →
anubis13–70.0328%5 Oct →
mirage7–130.0320%5 Oct →
mirage13–100.0617%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0617%5 Oct →
mirage12–120.0120%5 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0324%5 Oct →
mirage7–3-0.0224%5 Oct →
inferno13–70.0833%4 Oct →
inferno11–130.0638%4 Oct →
inferno6–130.0425%4 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.