CelleNdhyl

CelleNdhyl — CS2 Stats

IM76561198013087643[U:1:52821915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,702Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,676Top 10% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14161 of 229031 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,676 → 25,676
0Faceit ELO · 2,295 → 2,295
+2Tracked matches · now 2,702
−1.5ppWin rate · 58.6% → 57.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,676 +5,677 23 Jul18 Sept · 26 days played
19,99926,185peak 26,18523 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,295 +0 2 Sept18 Sept · 5 observations
2,2952,295peak 2,2952 Sept18 Sept
26,290Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,295Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,295
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 205 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 509 below peak (26,185)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,324 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCelleNdhylPREMIER25,676 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,295csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning58
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56377Last 10056%Win rateTLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.8
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time521ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 15–15 · inferno, 6 Sept
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA23131057%0.04
dust2B21111052%0.03
anubisC1661038%0.03
ancientA149564%0.05
cacheS129375%0.06
nukeB84450%0.02
mirageA53260%-0.00
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,305Matches
52%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
80.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust225448%1.1116.2
Inferno23158%1.2216.5
Anubis20750%1.1616.1
Nuke13850%1.1616.2
Mirage8050%1.1215.8
Ancient6357%1.1915.8
Vertigo5262%1.1615.8
Train4856%1.2317.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
519msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
53.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.75HE damage / grenade
15.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0557% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0418%18 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0135%18 Sept
ancient13–20.0925%17 Sept
anubis13–60.0715%17 Sept
dust213–40.0418%17 Sept
cache2–13-0.0127%17 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0417%17 Sept
dust22–130.0231%15 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0218%13 Sept
ancient0–13-0.0060%13 Sept
nuke13–100.0013%13 Sept
dust24–130.0738%13 Sept
anubis0–13-0.0220%9 Sept
inferno13–60.0419%9 Sept
dust213–30.015%9 Sept
dust213–110.0523%8 Sept
anubis13–10.1528%8 Sept
inferno13–60.1623%8 Sept
dust24–13-0.0123%8 Sept
dust23–13-0.0437%8 Sept
anubis16–130.0516%7 Sept
cache13–100.1224%7 Sept
inferno13–30.0820%7 Sept
dust213–8-0.026%6 Sept
ancient13–70.1321%6 Sept
inferno15–150.1620%6 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0227%5 Sept
dust26–130.0322%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0523%5 Sept
dust213–100.0624%5 Sept
vertigo13–8-0.0132%6 Aug
anubis11–130.0728%5 Aug
inferno13–60.0623%5 Aug
anubis13–40.1215%5 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0734%4 Aug
inferno13–40.0414%4 Aug
ancient13–90.1221%3 Aug
dust213–90.1117%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0415%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0125%3 Aug
cache13–40.0729%2 Aug
dust25–130.0531%2 Aug
nuke14–160.0312%2 Aug
cache11–130.0025%2 Aug
dust23–13-0.0117%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0614%1 Aug
ancient15–150.0217%31 Jul
inferno13–60.0332%31 Jul
anubis13–110.0418%31 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0013%30 Jul
cache13–9-0.0226%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0417%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0115%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0823%30 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0229%30 Jul
inferno13–110.0119%29 Jul
cache13–40.1319%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0221%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0329%28 Jul
inferno15–150.0315%28 Jul
cache13–100.0518%27 Jul
dust213–100.0342%27 Jul
ancient13–80.0215%27 Jul
inferno13–80.0513%27 Jul
cache16–140.0825%26 Jul
dust216–140.0721%26 Jul
anubis12–120.0719%26 Jul
inferno6–130.0518%26 Jul
cache2–13-0.0313%26 Jul
inferno13–40.0113%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0524%25 Jul
dust211–130.1129%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0626%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0128%25 Jul
mirage9–20.0023%25 Jul
cache13–80.0923%25 Jul
anubis12–160.0220%24 Jul
nuke13–30.0228%24 Jul
cache16–140.0415%24 Jul
anubis14–160.0414%24 Jul
inferno13–40.1024%24 Jul
dust25–13-0.0527%24 Jul
ancient13–20.1013%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0316%23 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0111%23 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0124%23 Jul
dust213–3-0.0137%23 Jul
inferno13–60.0819%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0217%23 Jul
dust213–40.0623%23 Jul
inferno13–90.1028%22 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0511%22 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0424%21 Jul
nuke15–150.0522%21 Jul
cache13–10.1228%21 Jul
ancient13–30.1223%21 Jul
anubis8–130.0216%20 Jul
nuke13–100.0121%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0520%20 Jul
dust213–60.0924%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →