aakertti

aakertti — CS2 Stats

FI76561198011217654[U:1:50951926]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,464Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,224Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4528 of 220834 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,464 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 19 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,224 -909 19 Dec16 Sept · 23 days played
26,51029,033peak 29,03319 Dec16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,437 +0 28 Aug16 Sept · 5 observations
2,4372,437peak 2,43728 Aug16 Sept
29,033Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,437Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2025-12-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,437
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 63 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,809 below peak (29,033)
  • +675 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,776 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaakerttiPREMIER27,224 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,437csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning54
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time588ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 8–0 · mirage, 17 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 23 May
313msFastest reaction time · 2–5 · ancient, 17 May
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 70% over 27cacheWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2719870%0.00
mirageA23131057%0.01
ancientC1771041%0.02
nukeB137654%0.04
infernoS107370%0.01
cacheC52340%-0.02
anubis32167%0.03
train21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

945Matches
57%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8158%1.0415.4
Mirage5646%0.9614.3
Nuke5364%1.1014.5
Dust24939%0.8813.9
Anubis3549%1.0115.3
Inferno1567%1.0515.3
Overpass838%0.8814.1
Vertigo20%0.9418.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
579msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
10.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.0441% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0322%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0222%26 Jun
nuke13–100.0329%24 Jun
anubis13–10.0720%24 Jun
nuke8–130.0525%24 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0116%23 Jun
dust211–70.0427%23 Jun
cache11–130.0419%23 May
dust23–13-0.1350%23 May
nuke13–100.0725%23 May
dust27–13-0.0222%17 May
cache0–13-0.1021%17 May
cache2–10-0.0429%17 May
cache13–80.0241%17 May
dust213–11-0.0031%17 May
ancient2–50.0017%17 May
ancient11–130.0220%16 May
ancient13–100.0427%15 May
nuke2–70.0544%15 May
cache13–3-0.0445%15 May
dust213–6-0.0418%15 May
dust213–100.0423%17 Apr
ancient13–20.0232%17 Apr
dust213–40.0930%17 Apr
mirage8–00.1219%17 Apr
ancient13–100.0717%17 Apr
dust213–40.0842%17 Apr
mirage8–130.0211%17 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0313%17 Apr
ancient13–20.0313%17 Apr
dust213–8-0.0322%16 Apr
anubis13–30.0313%16 Apr
dust213–30.0321%16 Apr
ancient13–10.1028%16 Apr
nuke10–130.1125%16 Apr
dust213–80.0522%12 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0218%12 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0218%5 Apr
nuke13–20.0618%4 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0518%4 Apr
inferno13–100.0326%4 Apr
mirage13–60.0820%4 Apr
mirage13–40.0420%4 Apr
nuke13–80.0324%4 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0633%4 Apr
mirage13–1-0.026%13 Mar
dust213–90.0013%13 Mar
dust29–130.0023%7 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0118%7 Mar
inferno13–100.0331%7 Mar
mirage13–110.0826%7 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0319%14 Feb
dust213–7-0.0323%31 Jan
ancient11–130.0315%10 Jan
ancient9–130.0128%10 Jan
train13–80.0227%10 Jan
dust20–12-0.0417%10 Jan
dust23–00.0029%10 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0419%6 Jan
ancient13–70.036%6 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0427%6 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0122%5 Jan
inferno13–90.1027%5 Jan
dust213–5-0.0334%5 Jan
mirage13–90.0831%5 Jan
train12–12-0.0319%5 Jan
dust213–10.0640%5 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0117%5 Jan
dust210–130.0125%4 Jan
inferno13–7-0.0217%4 Jan
mirage14–16-0.0516%4 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0025%4 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0322%2 Jan
mirage13–100.1017%2 Jan
dust213–100.0233%31 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0116%30 Dec
dust29–13-0.0526%30 Dec
ancient13–80.0619%30 Dec
dust213–80.0214%29 Dec
inferno13–110.0725%29 Dec
ancient11–130.0511%29 Dec
mirage1–50.0021%29 Dec
dust212–120.0219%29 Dec
inferno8–130.0022%29 Dec
mirage5–60.0422%29 Dec
dust27–13-0.0521%27 Dec
nuke13–60.1026%23 Dec
mirage11–130.0223%22 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0510%22 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0518%22 Dec
mirage13–6-0.017%22 Dec
dust213–50.0214%22 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0220%22 Dec
inferno7–13-0.0123%21 Dec
dust213–8-0.0427%21 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0215%20 Dec
mirage16–130.0124%19 Dec
mirage0–13-0.0922%19 Dec
nuke13–40.0928%19 Dec
dust213–80.0434%19 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →