rektchu

rektchu — CS2 Stats

76561198010563835[U:1:50298107]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,878Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,087Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42581 of 259677 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,264 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,087 -638 29 Aug – 27 Oct · 20 days played
22,70824,900peak 24,90029 Aug27 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,264 +0 29 Aug – 22 Sept · 4 observations
2,2642,264peak 2,26429 Aug22 Sept
24,900Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,264Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,264
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 236 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,813 below peak (24,900)
  • -1,015 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,913 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrektchuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,264 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,087 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,264csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning62
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLLWTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time509ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 475ms → last ⅓ avg 509ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 24 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · nuke, 10 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · nuke, 2 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 79% over 14ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3623–1364%0.03
mirageB2010–1050%-0.00
dust2S1411–379%-0.01
cacheC114–736%-0.01
ancientD51–420%0.02
nukeC52–340%0.01
anubis—42–250%0.00
poseidon—20–20%-0.14
debris—10–10%-0.01
eldorado—10–10%-0.06
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,030Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
73.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage52351%0.9614.7
Dust236248%1.0315.0
Ancient29252%0.9815.0
Anubis24643%1.0115.5
Inferno23260%1.0615.6
Overpass3253%0.9715.3
Cache2454%0.9214.1
Train2045%1.4518.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
517msReaction time
61.5%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
9.84HE damage / grenade
8.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0435%1 Nov →
inferno13–10.0721%1 Nov →
inferno9–60.1526%30 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0232%27 Oct →
ancient14–160.0823%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0717%27 Oct →
inferno9–60.0728%26 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0325%26 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0028%26 Oct →
inferno9–30.1023%26 Oct →
inferno9–70.0626%26 Oct →
inferno9–70.0010%26 Oct →
inferno9–40.0222%26 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0423%25 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0215%24 Oct →
anubis13–40.0529%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.0722%24 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0414%24 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1125%24 Oct →
inferno9–20.3231%24 Oct →
inferno9–70.1440%24 Oct →
cache13–60.0321%23 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0112%23 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0921%22 Oct →
mirage16–140.0620%22 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1320%19 Oct →
inferno9–50.0429%19 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0135%19 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0431%19 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0112%17 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0020%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0331%17 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0117%17 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0417%16 Oct →
nuke6–9-0.0927%14 Oct →
nuke4–9-0.0425%14 Oct →
inferno9–70.1124%14 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0221%14 Oct →
cache8–130.0329%14 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0313%14 Oct →
dust213–110.0123%13 Oct →
nuke9–00.1042%10 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.028%10 Oct →
inferno9–70.0710%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0927%8 Oct →
inferno9–60.1221%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0220%8 Oct →
ancient6–130.0122%8 Oct →
inferno9–40.0933%7 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.205%7 Oct →
poseidon0–9-0.2514%7 Oct →
debris7–9-0.0129%7 Oct →
cache16–19-0.0917%6 Oct →
inferno7–90.0223%6 Oct →
inferno9–30.2532%6 Oct →
mirage13–70.0023%6 Oct →
mirage15–19-0.0316%5 Oct →
mirage13–80.0625%4 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0415%4 Oct →
inferno6–90.0316%4 Oct →
eldorado6–9-0.0618%4 Oct →
inferno7–90.0723%4 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.0329%4 Oct →
inferno9–20.1311%4 Oct →
mirage0–2-0.000%3 Oct →
cache13–90.1032%2 Oct →
nuke13–20.1126%2 Oct →
inferno19–170.0236%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.0126%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0017%30 Sept →
inferno22–18-0.0327%30 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0022%30 Sept →
dust213–100.0513%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0110%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0419%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.0333%30 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0018%28 Sept →
dust216–140.0518%27 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.017%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0041%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0118%27 Sept →
dust214–160.0022%27 Sept →
cache13–100.0111%26 Sept →
mirage13–10.0416%25 Sept →
dust213–10.0127%25 Sept →
inferno9–70.0124%25 Sept →
inferno20–22-0.0034%24 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0615%24 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0521%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0421%24 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0414%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0130%24 Sept →
dust213–80.0534%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0028%23 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0424%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0436%23 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0428%23 Sept →
inferno1–9-0.0725%23 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0419%23 Sept →
dust20–13-0.090%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.