zaknaak — CS2 Stats

76561198006952531[U:1:46686803]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,159Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning77

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–43–10Last 10047%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.07
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

10–9–1 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9

Utility6.0

Positioning7.7

Opening Duels6.9

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like m0NESY 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning7.7

Utility6.0

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels5.9

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time506ms−25ms

first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms

Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 4 Jun →

35%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · cache, 16 Aug →

344msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 29 Aug →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

Strongest and weakest map need 5+ matches on two different maps — 1 of 8 maps qualify so far.

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	89	45–44	51%	0.04
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	0.04
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.12
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.06
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
mirage	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.12
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

708Matches

56%Win rate

1.43Avg K/D

103.0ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Cache	70	74%	1.58	18.8
Anubis	49	57%	1.73	18.6
Inferno	41	59%	1.64	20.4
Overpass	28	64%	1.52	21.1
Nuke	27	70%	1.53	19.3
Ancient	24	38%	1.22	20.3
Mirage	10	30%	1.30	19.6
Dust2	7	43%	1.07	18.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy

33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

77.8%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

507msReaction time

49.9%T opening success

57.2%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

10.14HE damage / grenade

13.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.4806% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	11–13	-0.01	14%	17 Sept →
cache	13–5	0.03	19%	16 Sept →
cache	13–0	0.16	15%	16 Sept →
cache	13–8	0.09	15%	11 Sept →
cache	13–6	0.08	22%	11 Sept →
cache	13–11	0.02	13%	11 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.01	15%	9 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.01	19%	3 Sept →
cache	10–13	0.08	18%	3 Sept →
anubis	7–13	0.03	10%	29 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	8%	28 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	10%	25 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.08	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.05	23%	23 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	0.12	7%	23 Aug →
cache	6–0	0.15	35%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	21%	16 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	24%	16 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	11%	14 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.12	13%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.02	15%	9 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	10%	9 Aug →
cache	10–0	0.08	10%	9 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.06	10%	9 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	7%	9 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.13	11%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.10	11%	8 Aug →
cache	3–0	0.06	8%	8 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.01	24%	8 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.04	8%	7 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.15	13%	7 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	8%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	15%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.10	12%	6 Aug →
cache	6–1	0.10	9%	4 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	10%	4 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	18%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.05	22%	31 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.10	20%	31 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.15	26%	24 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.07	16%	24 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	11%	23 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.04	18%	22 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.09	10%	22 Jul →
cache	9–8	0.02	16%	21 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.01	14%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	14%	18 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	24%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.11	15%	17 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	13%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.07	13%	16 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	32%	16 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	10%	16 Jul →
cache	11–4	0.08	11%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.04	12%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	16%	8 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	12%	8 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.15	16%	8 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.12	12%	7 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.04	18%	5 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	9%	5 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	11%	1 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.00	9%	1 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	11%	29 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.06	15%	29 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.02	11%	28 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.06	15%	28 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.10	19%	25 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.03	3%	23 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.01	20%	23 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.07	14%	23 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.02	11%	21 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.08	17%	21 Jun →
anubis	4–13	0.05	11%	21 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.08	21%	21 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.05	17%	21 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.07	7%	21 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.02	15%	21 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.04	16%	20 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.13	29%	16 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.02	10%	16 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.01	14%	16 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.10	11%	16 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.06	18%	16 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.01	16%	16 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.03	7%	16 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.01	22%	11 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.03	17%	10 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.07	12%	9 Jun →
cache	3–13	0.01	13%	9 Jun →
inferno	12–12	0.05	6%	8 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.08	13%	8 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.03	13%	8 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.06	12%	8 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.02	15%	8 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.07	16%	8 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.20	16%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.06	17%	3 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.02	15%	2 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.03	13%	1 Jun →