daunty

daunty — CS2 Stats

76561198002879375[U:1:42613647]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,566Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,338Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16631 of 223076 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,566 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 18 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,338 +1,781 18 May2 Sept · 17 days played
23,55727,902peak 27,90218 May2 Sept
27,902Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-05-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,564 below peak (27,902)
  • -2,155 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,662 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdauntyFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,338 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59392Last 10059%Win rateLLLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time572ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 16 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 18 May
398msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 2 Jun
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27151256%0.02
nukeS1511473%0.01
anubisA149564%0.03
ancientD124833%0.03
mirageB84450%0.03
infernoA74357%0.03
cacheS76186%0.04
overpass42250%0.04
vertigo42250%0.04
train220100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

187Matches
56%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
88.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4161%1.4421.0
Dust23447%1.2418.4
Mirage2941%1.4518.6
Nuke2080%1.7818.1
Ancient1553%1.4916.9
Inferno1560%1.4118.2
Overpass1443%1.7619.1
Vertigo1267%1.1216.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
573msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
7.64HE damage / grenade
6.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.0426%27 Jun
ancient6–130.0217%27 Jun
anubis9–130.0918%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.039%26 Jun
anubis13–70.0717%26 Jun
overpass13–160.0616%26 Jun
nuke13–60.1121%26 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0710%26 Jun
anubis13–20.0311%26 Jun
dust213–30.0922%25 Jun
mirage13–60.0616%25 Jun
dust213–60.0327%25 Jun
mirage13–60.039%25 Jun
ancient13–70.0715%25 Jun
mirage10–13-0.065%25 Jun
dust29–130.0518%23 Jun
mirage8–130.0614%23 Jun
anubis5–130.0021%21 Jun
cache13–30.0321%21 Jun
dust29–130.0824%21 Jun
cache13–70.0617%21 Jun
mirage13–40.0315%21 Jun
dust213–60.1017%21 Jun
dust213–6-0.0132%20 Jun
nuke13–40.0125%20 Jun
inferno13–30.0623%20 Jun
train13–50.0623%20 Jun
train13–110.0518%20 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0413%17 Jun
inferno13–30.1628%16 Jun
mirage11–130.0410%16 Jun
dust27–130.0027%16 Jun
dust213–30.0135%16 Jun
nuke13–70.0517%16 Jun
dust213–30.0720%16 Jun
inferno13–20.0425%15 Jun
cache13–90.0411%15 Jun
overpass13–20.0720%15 Jun
mirage11–130.0221%15 Jun
ancient15–150.1022%14 Jun
dust211–130.0016%13 Jun
dust23–130.0317%13 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0321%13 Jun
dust213–160.0718%12 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0215%11 Jun
dust213–40.0611%11 Jun
dust213–110.0115%10 Jun
dust26–130.039%10 Jun
nuke8–130.0012%10 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0313%10 Jun
mirage13–70.0913%10 Jun
cache13–60.0319%10 Jun
vertigo13–50.117%9 Jun
ancient10–130.0122%8 Jun
cache13–10-0.0120%8 Jun
anubis19–170.0715%5 Jun
vertigo13–90.0326%4 Jun
dust213–110.0315%4 Jun
vertigo11–130.0415%4 Jun
cache13–110.0916%4 Jun
dust27–130.0221%4 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0714%2 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0712%2 Jun
dust213–5-0.0318%2 Jun
anubis2–130.0417%2 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0715%2 Jun
ancient7–130.0911%2 Jun
nuke13–70.0524%28 May
anubis13–40.0717%25 May
ancient13–7-0.0314%25 May
dust22–13-0.0519%25 May
cache9–130.0315%25 May
dust213–8-0.0715%24 May
nuke13–10-0.0020%24 May
nuke13–80.0418%24 May
ancient13–80.0811%24 May
nuke13–50.0223%24 May
dust213–9-0.0221%24 May
ancient4–130.0311%24 May
ancient13–50.0712%23 May
inferno15–15-0.0414%23 May
dust213–110.0324%23 May
nuke13–00.0243%23 May
nuke13–00.0633%23 May
inferno13–80.0512%22 May
ancient11–130.0516%22 May
dust29–130.0126%22 May
dust213–50.0724%22 May
dust213–60.0719%22 May
ancient10–13-0.0817%20 May
anubis13–5-0.0124%20 May
overpass13–80.1012%20 May
nuke13–100.0214%20 May
anubis13–20.1220%20 May
anubis13–100.0218%18 May
dust27–130.0330%18 May
vertigo7–13-0.0130%18 May
nuke2–13-0.0550%18 May
anubis13–30.0320%18 May
anubis10–130.0627%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →