REMiw0W~

REMiw0W~ — CS2 Stats

LT76561198001666487[U:1:41400759]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,379Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,372Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68874 of 223534 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 1 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,372 -1,454 1 Mar5 Sept · 15 days played
20,37224,142peak 24,1421 Mar5 Sept
24,638Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-03-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,770 below peak (24,142)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,628 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGREMiw0W~FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,372 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning46
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility6.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time565ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 8 Mar
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 6 Apr
359msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA31171455%-0.02
mirageB24111346%-0.03
nukeS119282%-0.02
cacheA95456%-0.03
overpassC94544%-0.03
ancientD72529%-0.05
dust2B63350%0.02
anubis3030%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,509Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
70.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
27.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.1%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
572msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
11.91HE damage / grenade
8.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.9416% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0319%5 Sept
cache13–8-0.0611%5 Sept
inferno13–60.0224%5 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0622%5 Sept
cache13–90.0218%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.096%29 Aug
cache13–10-0.0324%29 Aug
inferno13–80.0116%29 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0422%29 Aug
cache3–13-0.079%29 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0419%29 Aug
inferno13–50.0320%29 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0813%16 Aug
cache13–10-0.0017%16 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0117%16 Aug
inferno4–130.0216%16 Aug
nuke13–4-0.084%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0221%2 Aug
cache13–16-0.0236%2 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0119%2 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0525%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0125%21 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1113%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0314%21 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0330%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.125%19 Jul
cache13–10-0.0114%19 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0125%19 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0130%19 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0224%19 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0121%12 Jul
cache15–15-0.0722%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.058%12 Jul
ancient16–140.0220%6 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0414%6 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0523%6 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0518%19 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0318%19 Apr
inferno13–60.0120%19 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0221%19 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0424%6 Apr
nuke13–80.0040%6 Apr
mirage13–110.0519%6 Apr
mirage2–13-0.116%6 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0413%1 Apr
inferno13–30.0135%1 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0322%1 Apr
overpass15–15-0.0430%29 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0728%29 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0320%29 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0420%29 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0523%29 Mar
nuke13–50.0123%29 Mar
mirage13–00.0923%29 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0223%28 Mar
inferno13–110.0025%28 Mar
inferno5–13-0.088%28 Mar
overpass13–50.0420%28 Mar
overpass13–160.0220%26 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0415%26 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0129%26 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0710%26 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0216%26 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0227%21 Mar
dust211–130.0121%21 Mar
ancient12–16-0.1018%21 Mar
inferno13–70.0120%21 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0920%14 Mar
nuke8–13-0.034%14 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0718%14 Mar
dust213–11-0.0417%14 Mar
dust213–70.0625%8 Mar
mirage13–100.0315%8 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0121%8 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0717%8 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0233%8 Mar
mirage13–100.0223%8 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0221%8 Mar
overpass4–13-0.096%8 Mar
dust210–13-0.0427%8 Mar
dust213–30.1331%8 Mar
inferno9–130.0226%7 Mar
mirage15–15-0.057%7 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0317%7 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0711%7 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0419%7 Mar
nuke13–1-0.0417%7 Mar
mirage13–110.0015%7 Mar
inferno13–100.0117%6 Mar
dust26–130.0018%6 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0327%6 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0215%6 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0317%1 Mar
inferno16–12-0.0510%1 Mar
mirage10–13-0.059%1 Mar
overpass13–80.0035%1 Mar
nuke13–90.0223%1 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0317%1 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0340%1 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0111%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →