Horrorshow Flux

Horrorshow Flux — CS2 Stats

76561198000068960[U:1:39803232]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

2,248Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (60 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,248 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,532 +3,168 29 Jan – 6 Jul · 25 days played
17,36421,889peak 21,88929 Jan6 Jul
22,321Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-01-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHorrorshow FluxFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning40
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +31ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time648ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy30.2%+7.4%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 30.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 26 Jan →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · anubis, 2 Jul →
414msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 15 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 14 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 43% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3722–1559%-0.02
mirageC2310–1343%-0.02
ancientS1511–473%-0.01
anubisB115–645%-0.01
cacheA85–363%-0.02
warden—11–0100%0.07
vertigo—10–10%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.07
office—10–10%0.04
inferno—11–0100%-0.00
train—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 23). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

435Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
70.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2667%1.1816.8
Anubis520%0.9314.0
Vertigo367%0.9121.7
Mirage20%0.7614.5
Ancient10%0.365.0
Inferno10%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy
28.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
655msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
15.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.4299% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–16-0.0525%15 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.1013%15 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0620%6 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0433%6 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0330%6 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0623%2 Jul →
mirage12–160.0125%2 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0620%2 Jul →
anubis5–00.0067%2 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0337%2 Jul →
dust216–140.0324%23 Jun →
mirage13–2-0.0124%23 Jun →
warden13–70.0732%23 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0628%13 Jun →
dust213–40.0023%6 Jun →
ancient13–60.0438%6 Jun →
vertigo12–120.0135%6 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.0233%6 Jun →
cache13–20.0718%14 May →
cache13–7-0.0223%14 May →
cache0–3-0.050%14 May →
cache9–2-0.0140%14 May →
cache11–13-0.0535%14 May →
cache13–8-0.0528%14 May →
cache13–10.0450%14 May →
cache12–12-0.0747%14 May →
dust216–140.0326%10 May →
mirage9–13-0.0135%10 May →
anubis8–13-0.0323%10 May →
dust213–40.0144%25 Apr →
mirage13–100.0231%25 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0536%25 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0030%25 Apr →
anubis7–130.0320%23 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0729%23 Apr →
anubis13–100.0017%23 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0226%23 Apr →
ancient9–130.0032%23 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0324%23 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0428%17 Apr →
dust213–80.047%17 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0126%11 Apr →
mirage13–80.0029%11 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0831%11 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0918%5 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0617%5 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.0719%5 Apr →
dust213–60.0242%4 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0335%4 Apr →
mirage2–13-0.0719%4 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0522%30 Mar →
dust21–13-0.139%30 Mar →
dust213–80.0222%30 Mar →
anubis13–60.0115%22 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0720%22 Mar →
dust210–130.0333%22 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0311%22 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0138%22 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0315%21 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0820%21 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0829%21 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0131%21 Mar →
office11–130.0419%16 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0038%16 Mar →
dust213–70.0027%15 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0240%15 Mar →
dust213–3-0.0119%15 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0221%15 Mar →
mirage7–130.0222%12 Mar →
ancient13–100.0118%12 Mar →
dust213–70.0229%12 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0322%26 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0321%26 Feb →
mirage13–110.0229%26 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0320%24 Feb →
train13–40.0646%24 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0424%22 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0417%15 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0121%15 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0113%13 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0221%13 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0822%8 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0419%8 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0025%8 Feb →
dust28–130.0127%4 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0318%4 Feb →
ancient13–110.0021%3 Feb →
mirage13–110.0422%3 Feb →
anubis13–16-0.0117%3 Feb →
ancient13–110.0225%29 Jan →
dust213–50.0825%29 Jan →
dust210–130.0532%29 Jan →
dust213–7-0.0325%29 Jan →
dust213–100.0020%28 Jan →
ancient10–130.0115%28 Jan →
ancient13–30.0226%27 Jan →
ancient11–130.0622%27 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0310%26 Jan →
dust213–5-0.0038%26 Jan →
anubis13–50.0918%26 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.