Wheezy

Wheezy — CS2 Stats

DE76561197994161719[U:1:33895991]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,434Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,706Purple band · top ~17.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,021 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,706 +349 4 Sept – 29 Oct · 24 days played
16,61518,382peak 18,3824 Sept29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,021 +0 4 Sept – 24 Sept · 3 observations
1,0211,021peak 1,0214 Sept24 Sept
18,635Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,021Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-09-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,021
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 676 below peak (18,382)
  • +138 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,294 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWheezyFACEITLevel 6 · 1,021 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,706 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,021csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning59
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time583ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 10 Oct →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 8–4 · rush_001, 2 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 25 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2916–1355%-0.01
ancientA2212–1055%0.00
dust2D123–925%-0.01
cacheB115–645%0.01
mirageS75–271%0.02
rush_001D62–433%0.01
nukeA53–260%-0.03
anubisD51–420%0.00
train—11–0100%-0.02
overpass—10–10%0.06
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

370Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
73.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8952%0.9114.0
Ancient7240%0.8414.0
Dust26552%0.9715.2
Nuke4945%0.9214.2
Cache3959%0.9914.0
Mirage2462%0.8812.8
Anubis2060%0.8613.3
Overpass757%0.8917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
581msReaction time
55.2%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
10.82HE damage / grenade
8.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0515%30 Oct →
mirage13–110.0117%29 Oct →
dust213–100.0126%29 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0015%29 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0221%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0714%25 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0216%25 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.049%25 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.019%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.0417%25 Oct →
inferno8–130.018%25 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0311%24 Oct →
ancient13–30.0317%24 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0227%24 Oct →
dust213–90.0417%24 Oct →
ancient9–130.078%21 Oct →
cache13–90.0715%21 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0021%17 Oct →
nuke13–50.0113%17 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0112%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.059%16 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0812%16 Oct →
ancient13–70.0421%16 Oct →
dust23–130.029%14 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0013%14 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0424%14 Oct →
ancient9–130.0122%12 Oct →
inferno13–100.0010%12 Oct →
ancient16–120.0515%11 Oct →
cache12–160.0212%11 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
mirage13–70.1822%10 Oct →
anubis9–130.0215%10 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0013%10 Oct →
inferno14–160.0112%9 Oct →
ancient13–90.0911%9 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0513%8 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0221%8 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0415%5 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0313%4 Oct →
inferno13–80.0114%4 Oct →
train13–4-0.0214%4 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0318%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0317%4 Oct →
inferno13–60.0416%4 Oct →
cache12–120.0015%4 Oct →
inferno10–130.0215%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0512%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0021%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0015%2 Oct →
rush_0013–70.0510%2 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.029%2 Oct →
rush_0018–4-0.0675%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0517%1 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0422%1 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0219%1 Oct →
mirage13–50.0632%30 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0013%30 Sept →
dust28–130.0421%30 Sept →
rush_0014–80.1033%30 Sept →
rush_0017–80.0220%30 Sept →
rush_0014–8-0.0931%30 Sept →
rush_0016–20.0527%30 Sept →
cache16–130.0421%29 Sept →
inferno13–10.0914%29 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.055%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0516%29 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.039%27 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0424%27 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0317%26 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0111%26 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0410%26 Sept →
cache7–130.0010%25 Sept →
ancient16–130.0522%22 Sept →
cache12–120.0621%22 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0523%22 Sept →
cache13–50.0216%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0842%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.058%18 Sept →
inferno13–100.0627%17 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0224%16 Sept →
ancient13–110.0117%16 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0213%16 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0812%15 Sept →
anubis14–160.0114%15 Sept →
overpass6–130.0618%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0612%14 Sept →
inferno12–120.0017%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0120%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0226%13 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0816%13 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0414%13 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0010%12 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0823%11 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.019%7 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0016%7 Sept →
dust211–130.0313%6 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0118%6 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0220%6 Sept →
dust211–130.0122%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.