escottie

escottie — CS2 Stats

76561197988911399[U:1:28645671]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

884Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating29,333Top 1% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~0.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#908 of 225041 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 7 Nov 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 29,333 +7,505 31 May12 Sept · 15 days played
21,51529,333peak 29,33331 May12 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,850 +0 28 Aug29 Aug · 2 observations
2,8502,850peak 2,85028 Aug29 Aug
29,333Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,850Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2024-11-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 29,333
  • +1,713 over 30 days · improving
  • +7,505 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 667 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGescottiePREMIER29,333 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,850csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning61
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT73261Last 10073%Win rateWWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 164 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time510ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–1 · grail, 8 May
62%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 30 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 2 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W4Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 7trainWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2316770%0.05
ancientS1613381%0.01
cacheS1311285%0.09
dust2S107370%0.04
anubisA85363%0.09
nukeS76186%0.04
trainD62433%0.04
infernoA53260%0.02
office32167%0.09
vertigo330100%0.07
grail32167%0.13
overpass110100%0.05
warden110100%0.02
agency110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,104Matches
62%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
79.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10360%1.0716.0
Ancient5265%1.1215.9
Nuke2361%1.2617.5
Dust22167%1.1017.6
Inferno1963%1.2815.9
Anubis1457%1.1116.2
Vertigo1354%1.2118.0
Overpass771%1.1417.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
44.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.1%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
504msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
8.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1861% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Train

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Train callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0716%12 Sept
cache13–10.1218%12 Sept
nuke13–110.0417%6 Sept
nuke13–90.039%6 Sept
office11–130.1011%5 Sept
dust213–90.0718%4 Sept
dust213–30.0215%2 Sept
ancient13–110.038%2 Sept
mirage13–60.1112%2 Sept
cache7–130.0720%2 Sept
nuke13–80.0111%2 Sept
ancient13–60.1616%31 Aug
cache13–40.0317%31 Aug
mirage13–50.168%30 Aug
dust211–130.0516%28 Aug
cache11–20.0120%26 Aug
cache13–100.0913%26 Aug
inferno7–130.0117%26 Aug
cache13–70.0313%23 Aug
mirage13–110.129%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0318%12 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0222%12 Aug
dust216–140.0420%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0611%9 Aug
ancient13–40.009%9 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0330%8 Aug
mirage2–130.0318%8 Aug
mirage0–5-0.0329%8 Aug
nuke11–130.1018%7 Aug
mirage13–00.1712%2 Aug
vertigo13–40.039%29 Jul
vertigo13–80.075%29 Jul
anubis8–130.0113%25 Jul
mirage11–130.0113%25 Jul
cache13–80.0614%25 Jul
ancient13–90.0010%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0616%21 Jul
ancient13–30.0413%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0221%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0413%13 Jul
cache10–130.0314%11 Jul
mirage13–9-0.045%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0414%9 Jul
anubis13–10.0910%9 Jul
cache13–20.069%9 Jul
nuke13–40.0718%2 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0510%31 May
ancient13–2-0.008%31 May
dust213–70.0024%31 May
inferno10–20.0725%31 May
mirage11–130.0414%31 May
nuke13–40.098%30 May
mirage0–130.0062%30 May
mirage13–80.127%30 May
anubis5–130.1528%28 May
anubis13–60.1618%28 May
inferno13–80.0215%18 May
dust213–10.1319%17 May
mirage13–80.1722%17 May
overpass7–20.054%17 May
anubis9–130.015%17 May
mirage10–130.1615%16 May
inferno14–160.0614%16 May
cache13–20.1527%16 May
ancient13–40.0113%16 May
mirage13–50.0412%16 May
warden13–50.0217%16 May
cache13–30.1229%16 May
cache13–60.2513%12 May
cache13–110.0925%10 May
train1–80.0011%25 Apr
vertigo13–50.1210%11 Apr
anubis13–20.0815%6 Apr
anubis13–50.1122%6 Apr
office13–110.018%22 Mar
office13–20.1710%22 Mar
train5–13-0.015%10 Sept
train13–50.1219%10 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0415%3 Sept
grail13–90.0111%28 Aug
grail7–130.1026%27 Aug
anubis13–10.086%20 Aug
dust213–110.0425%9 Aug
agency13–60.1518%9 Aug
mirage13–30.0511%19 Jul
train13–110.1711%18 Jul
train8–13-0.110%1 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0021%26 May
train8–130.0517%26 May
dust217–19-0.0119%13 May
grail13–10.2917%8 May
mirage13–11-0.0411%7 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0218%7 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0413%26 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0214%14 Feb
inferno13–9-0.0315%12 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0112%13 Jan
mirage13–110.0612%3 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0012%4 Dec
ancient13–60.019%7 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →