holzt

holzt — CS2 Stats

76561197980923031[U:1:20657303]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

3,614Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,085 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,085 → 3,085
+9Tracked matches · now 3,614
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 28 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,329 +0 29 Aug1 Sept · 3 observations
20,32920,329peak 20,32929 Aug1 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,085 +0 29 Aug19 Sept · 5 observations
3,0853,085peak 3,08529 Aug19 Sept
20,329Peak Premier on CSDB
3,085Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2025-09-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,085
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 415 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGholztFACEITLevel 10 · 3,085 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,085csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning47
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6238Last 10062%Win rateLLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility7.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.7
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time538ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 8 Aug
48%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · inferno, 8 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 7 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1310In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2012860%0.01
mirageS1914574%0.02
ancientB168850%-0.01
infernoA159660%-0.02
anubisS96367%0.01
dust2C73443%-0.01
trainB63350%-0.01
overpassS550100%-0.01
cache32167%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,713Matches
68%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
83.2ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
61Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient42562%1.1216.5
Nuke41572%1.1916.7
Mirage34656%1.0816.3
Dust228858%1.1016.0
Anubis26455%1.1516.3
Inferno18265%1.1415.6
Train15469%1.1816.4
Overpass5465%1.1815.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
530msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
14.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0552% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0317%9 Sept
mirage10–130.0129%8 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0217%6 Sept
mirage13–70.0324%6 Sept
ancient13–70.0718%3 Sept
nuke13–50.0728%30 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0125%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0418%20 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0737%19 Aug
anubis13–50.1330%8 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0231%7 Aug
cache16–140.0122%15 Jul
cache13–70.0211%15 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0614%1 Jul
inferno16–140.0329%16 Jun
dust213–6-0.0232%8 Jun
overpass13–2-0.084%7 Jun
nuke6–130.0126%7 Jun
anubis16–140.0727%5 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0417%26 May
inferno5–13-0.0426%8 May
anubis6–13-0.0519%6 May
cache8–13-0.0323%3 May
inferno13–11-0.0117%1 May
nuke9–130.0320%1 May
ancient13–6-0.0238%1 May
dust23–130.0426%26 Apr
overpass13–90.0130%24 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0122%20 Apr
nuke13–60.0131%20 Apr
mirage11–130.0021%19 Apr
overpass13–50.0125%8 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0319%4 Apr
nuke13–100.0627%3 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0527%2 Apr
dust213–80.0425%30 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0318%29 Mar
mirage13–90.0629%8 Mar
inferno2–130.0048%8 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0523%5 Mar
dust211–13-0.0620%5 Mar
anubis13–30.0221%9 Feb
mirage16–130.0323%9 Feb
nuke13–80.0332%9 Feb
inferno2–13-0.1224%6 Feb
ancient13–20.0227%6 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0216%6 Feb
inferno13–50.0021%6 Feb
dust27–13-0.0239%6 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0417%5 Feb
dust210–13-0.0727%5 Feb
nuke9–130.0120%31 Dec
nuke9–130.0120%31 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0226%30 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0132%26 Dec
ancient13–5-0.0127%26 Dec
inferno16–12-0.0223%26 Dec
overpass13–60.0219%25 Dec
train8–13-0.0416%20 Dec
inferno13–30.0117%29 Nov
ancient7–13-0.0417%23 Nov
mirage11–130.0423%21 Nov
inferno4–13-0.0246%16 Nov
ancient13–70.0420%9 Nov
nuke16–130.0325%8 Nov
ancient4–130.0742%31 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0832%24 Oct
ancient12–16-0.1024%22 Oct
mirage13–8-0.0224%22 Oct
mirage16–140.0330%21 Oct
mirage13–100.0623%20 Oct
inferno13–9-0.0320%20 Oct
nuke13–4-0.0033%20 Oct
mirage13–80.1122%19 Oct
ancient14–160.0523%19 Oct
mirage13–110.0522%19 Oct
train13–6-0.0435%19 Oct
inferno11–13-0.0617%19 Oct
nuke13–7-0.0235%19 Oct
mirage14–16-0.0713%18 Oct
train11–13-0.0333%18 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0334%18 Oct
ancient13–11-0.0219%18 Oct
train13–5-0.0625%18 Oct
inferno13–90.0127%18 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0835%18 Oct
train13–50.1219%17 Oct
nuke16–140.0130%17 Oct
mirage13–50.0644%17 Oct
mirage14–16-0.0529%13 Oct
ancient13–7-0.0125%13 Oct
nuke13–10-0.0122%13 Oct
nuke13–40.0232%13 Oct
mirage13–110.0629%29 Sept
dust213–80.0728%29 Sept
train10–13-0.0328%29 Sept
inferno13–70.0927%29 Sept
mirage13–100.0224%28 Sept
nuke13–50.0631%28 Sept
nuke16–130.0327%28 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →